The Obama re-election campaign has attacked Mitt Romney’s oft-touted business record, thereby adding to the growing chorus of seemingly anti-business rhetoric aimed at the former Massachusetts governor. President Obama’s re-election campaign sent out a memo on Friday accusing Mitt Romney of “destroying companies and good-paying jobs in order to reap huge profits,” according to Jamie Dupree of  The Atlanta Journal-Constitution . These are some excerpts from the memo: … Romney’s objective in business was never job creation. …Romney closed over a thousand plants, stores and offices, and cut employee wages, benefits and pensions. He laid off American workers and outsourced their jobs to other countries. And he and his partners made hundreds of millions of dollars while taking companies to bankruptcy. Although some of the businesses in which he took a stake undoubtedly added jobs, neither Romney’s campaign nor any independent fact checker has supported his claim of producing a net increase of 100,000 American jobs – or even anything close to it. … Armed with the facts, the American people will determine whether Mitt Romney’s track record shows he believes our prosperity will come from an economy where the wealthy and powerful can rig the game at the expense of working Americans, or every American who works hard and acts responsibly will have a fair shot at success. Voters can judge for themselves whether his vision for the future is based on outsourcing and bubble economies that enrich speculators and corporate raiders, or an economy built to last in which the productivity of our workers is rewarded. … Our economic crisis and endemic income inequality were caused in large part by a few who put profits over people. Taking advantage of an uneven playing field, where there was one rulebook for those at the top and another for everyone else, Mitt Romney and his friends made money hand over fist while working families lost their grip on the middle-class lifestyle they earned. The memo’s authors quickly switch from condemning Romney to praising President Barack Obama for creating jobs and growing the economy: “ … [he] has taken formidable, decisive steps to protect free enterprise , investors and consumers – and why he’s fighting for an economy that’s built to last… ” “ …the President championed Wall Street reform that requires more rigorous disclosure and tightens oversight of the kind of speculation that caused the market meltdown… ” The memo also claims the president rescued the U.S. auto industry, revived manufacturing, and freed businesses from “burdensome regulations.” However, it’s not the boasts about President Obama’s economic “successes” that have some critics scratching their heads. It’s the decision to attack Mitt Romney via private equity. Considering the fact that President Obama has “both taken donations from the industry and appointed a number of private equity veterans to his administration,” as Alexander Burns of  Politico writes, this line of attack seems very odd. Here is a sampling of some of the “private equity veterans” President Obama has surrounded himself with (via Politico ): Jack Lew :  The new White House chief of staff was previously a managing director at Citi Alternative Investments Nancy-Ann DeParle : A deputy chief of staff who helped lead the president’s health care reform effort was also a managing director at CCMP Capital Jeffrey Goldstein : The recently-departed undersecretary of the Treasury for Domestic Finance was also a managing director at Hellman & Friedman before he joined the administration. He’s returning to the private equity firm now that he has resigned Steve Rattner : A former auto czar who came out of the world of private equity before briefly working with the administration Mark Gallogly : Works for Centerbridge Partners, and is formerly of the Blackstone Group. He was on the President’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board Richard Parsons : Former Time Warner executive on the President’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness. He is also linked to Providence Equity Partners Inc Walter Jones : Currently the U.S. executive director of the African Development Bank, he was also a senior private equity executive with Gravitas Capital Advisors And these are just a few examples. This list doesn’t even mention the other “private equity veterans” currently employed by the President’s Management Advisory Board, the Board for International Food and Agriculture Development, the National Infrastructure Advisory Council and the Advisory Committee of the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. “If President Obama plans to campaign against Mitt Romney and the alleged evils of private equity, then he will need to start by purging the ranks of his own administration,” a private equity insider told Politico . Final Thought : Seeing as how they’ve decided to target him specifically, as opposed to any of the other GOP candidates, it seems the Obama re-election campaign is confident Mitt Romney will win the GOP nomination. Read the full memo here.

Read this article:
Obama Re-Election Campaign Accuses Romney of Being a ‘Corporate Raider’ and Exploiting the Middle Class

Tagged with:
 

Unraveling Autism

On December 12, 2011, in Health Care, Uncategorized, by KavinHildring485

At Los Angeles Times : Amber Dias couldn’t be sure what was wrong with her little boy. Chase was a bright, loving 2 1/2-year-old. But he didn’t talk much and rarely responded to his own name. He hated crowds and had a strange fascination with the underside of the family tractor. Searching the Internet, Amber found stories about other children like Chase — on websites devoted to autism. “He wasn’t the kid rocking in the corner, but it was just enough to scare me,” recalled Dias, who lives with her husband and three children on a dairy farm in the Central Valley town of Kingsburg. She took Chase to a psychologist in Los Angeles, who said the boy indeed had autism and urged the family to seek immediate treatment. But a team at the Fresno agency that arranges state-funded services for autism said Chase didn’t have the disorder. His problems, staff members said, were nothing more than common developmental delays that he would eventually outgrow. Unconvinced, Dias imagined the worst — that Chase would never have a girlfriend, a job, a place of his own. She pressed the agency to reconsider and hinted at a lawsuit. Finally, officials relented, and her son began receiving 40 hours a week of one-on-one behaviorial therapy. She had to hint about a lawsuit? God, that is awful. My wife’s grandparents lived in Kingsburg. For a while, we went down there from Fresno every week or two for dinner with the whole family. It’s total heartland territory. It feels like the Midwest, with all the agriculture and Scandinavian culture. Anyway, continue reading at the link .

Link:
Unraveling Autism

Tagged with:
 

VDH on Immigration, Multiculturalism and Amnesty

On December 2, 2011, in Uncategorized, by prsnlinjurys

Victor Davis Hanson is the very best commentator on the illegal immigration crisis in California. Hanson’s don’t-miss book is Mexifornia: A State of Becoming .

Read the original:
VDH on Immigration, Multiculturalism and Amnesty

ContributorNetwork – The decision by President Barack Obama to halt planned shale drilling in Wayne National Forest could cost Ohio up to 200,000 jobs. The delay ordered through the Department of Agriculture is expected to last six months while a study on hydraulic fracturing is completed. The process, commonly referred to a fracking, infuses a solution of primarily water and saline to open cracks in underground shale to release natural gas.

Read the original post:
Ohioans Share Thoughts on Shale Drilling in Wayne National Forest
(ContributorNetwork)

**Written by Doug Powers The proposed “industry funded fee” on fresh Christmas trees is being back-burnered. Nothing like some public backlash heading into an election season to put an administration in the holiday spirit. Actually, the delay appears to be in order to buy the Department of Agriculture some time to figure out a better way to explain to us why making things more expensive is always the best way to get a segment of the economy moving again. From The Hill : The Department of Agriculture on Thursday officially delayed a proposed 15 cent per tree fee paid by Christmas tree producers in order to fund a marketing and promotion effort to help boost tree sales. “Due to recent events, the regulations are stayed in order to provide all interested persons, including the Christmas tree industry and the general public, an opportunity to become more familiar with the program,” it said. Great tree industry promotion on the part of the Agriculture Department. Just as Christmas tree season approaches, they announced an initiative that gave consumers the impression that the cost of fresh Christmas trees would be rising. Traditionally that’s not the kind of news that gets businesses turnstyles moving faster, buy hey, who am I to argue with administration economists? **Written by Doug Powers Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

See the original post here:
‘Christmas Tree Tax’ Officially Chopped Down… For Now

With much fanfare in the midst of their campaign to take back control of the House of Representatives, House Republicans unveiled their Pledge to America . Many conservatives thought it was an enormous missed opportunity to lock a new Republican majority into a bold reform agenda. But House Republicans said that they wanted to under promise and over deliver. Who knew their conservative critics would end up being the keeper of their low expectations? Unfortunately, Leadership’s commitment to their Pledge deteriorated quickly upon taking control. The Pledge called for a $100 billion cut in nondefense spending, but since this was going to be too hard in an abbreviated fiscal year, they decided to “prorate” that amount. Conservatives at the Republican Study Committee fought their Leadership and got them closer to $100 billion, but not all the way. However, the Pledge also promised to transform the way the House of Representatives as an institution would be run. They promised to end the practice of packaging spending bills and other related legislation into so-called “omnibus” bills. Specifically, House Republicans pledged to “end the practice of packaging unpopular bills with ‘must pass’ legislation to circumvent the will of the American people. Instead, we will advance major legislation one issue at a time.” Since it doesn’t actually say the word omnibus, did they mean something else? No, the passage was widely known to mean an end to omnibus bills. In fact, according to an October 2010 post on Speaker Boehner’s own blog, “House Republicans have also called for an end to the practice of passing massive ‘omnibus’ spending bills, arguing such bills make it too difficult to cut spending and too easy to shield spending projects from public scrutiny and debate.” Now, House Republicans are about to violate this pledge too. They are packaging three spending bills together in a so-called “minibus,” combining the Agriculture, Transportation-HUD, and Commerce-Justice-Science appropriations bills, but this simply amounts to playing games with names to save face. The bill would violate the House-passed, Ryan budget by at least $13 billion. Here is one example of why the bill costs so much that illustrates the logic of Congressional appropriators. According to CQ, “[the Women, Infants, and Children nutrition program] would receive $6.6 billion. That is $570 million more than the House-passed Agriculture bill and $36 million more than Senate appropriators had recommended .” What sort of degenerate negotiating is this? It would also include a very troubling provision to expand Federal Housing Administration (FHA) subsidies up to $729,750 mortgages. Never mind that FHA is going broke, and this provision could prove to be an accelerator on a future taxpayer bailout . According to a Reuters article this morning , an FHA audit recently revealed that its cash reserves are so low, “that there is close to a 50% chance it could run out of funds and may require a taxpayer bailout next year.” FHA is leveraged 300-to-1, with roughly only $3 billion in reserves to cover its $1 trillion portfolio . Given that the minimum downpayment for FHA loans is only 3.5%, most of these FHA borrowers have little equity in their homes . Did we not learn the colossal stupidity of this sort of economic policy as a nation during the financial crisis in 2008? For instance, the GOP Pledge itself says that Fannie and Freddie, “triggered the financial meltdown by giving too many high risk loans to people who couldn’t afford them.” Why does the same logic not apply to FHA loans? Conservatives in the House would do well to vote no and force their Leadership to ”unpackage” these bills, at levels consistent with their own budget resolution and without provisions that will likely lead to future taxpayer bailouts. After all, they made a pledge to the American people to do just that.

Read more here:
House Republicans Set to Again Violate Their Pledge to America

Tagged with:
 

AP – The U.S. Department of Agriculture says it will drop some sweeping reforms proposed for the meat industry if Congress cuts money for enforcing the changes.

Go here to see the original:
USDA: Funding cut could kill meat industry reforms
(AP)

Who’s Up For a Christmas Tree Tax?

On November 10, 2011, in Uncategorized, by Richard Riker

Admin Update: Christmas Tree Tax: WH ‘Grinch’ Move Put on Hold 11/09/11 8:51PM _____________________ Yes, you can thank the Obama administration for this one (Heritage) President Obama’s Agriculture Department today announced that it will impose a new 15-cent charge on all fresh Christmas trees—the Christmas Tree Tax—to support a new Federal program to improve the image and marketing

Read this article:
Who’s Up For a Christmas Tree Tax?

AP – Is the Obama administration really taxing Christmas trees? No, but the White House said Wednesday it was reversing its decision to approve an industry-sponsored Christmas tree promotion program after conservatives accused the Agriculture Department of spoiling Christmas with a new tree tax.

Read more from the original source:
USDA yanks Christmas tree fees after criticism
(AP)

A Christmas Tree Tax?

On November 9, 2011, in Uncategorized, by kohler

**Written by Doug Powers When I read that the federal government was getting involved in the Christmas tree industry, I couldn’t believe the first order of business wasn’t to remove the word “Christmas” from the name. Maybe that’ll come later, but for now the Obama administration is trying to help during a down economy, which of course involves a new business fee, which will cost consumers more. I can feel that recession lifting already. From Heritage.org : President Obama’s Agriculture Department today announced that it will impose a new 15-cent charge on all fresh Christmas trees — the Christmas Tree Tax — to support a new Federal program to improve the image and marketing of Christmas trees. In the Federal Register of November 8, 2011, Acting Administrator of Agricultural Marketing David R. Shipman announced that the Secretary of Agriculture will appoint a Christmas Tree Promotion Board. The purpose of the Board is to run a “program of promotion, research, evaluation, and information designed to strengthen the Christmas tree industry’s position in the marketplace; maintain and expend existing markets for Christmas trees; and to carry out programs, plans, and projects designed to provide maximum benefits to the Christmas tree industry” (7 CFR 1214.46(n)). And the program of “information” is to include efforts to “enhance the image of Christmas trees and the Christmas tree industry in the United States” (7 CFR 1214.10). The fee is 15 cents on all fresh trees for growers who sell more than 500 trees a year, a cost that will no doubt be passed along to consumers. I looked around a little and found an article in the Miami Herald that goes into this more from the growers’ perspective. The alleged point of the fee… or tax… or levy… whatever — is to stem the growth of the artificial tree industry to promote the sale of real trees (by making them a little more expensive?): Akin to similar programs that promote milk, beef and cotton, the new Christmas tree program will impose on U.S. domestic producers and importers an initial fee of 15 cents per tree. A 12-member board will direct the money to generic ads and other promotions, as well as research. The promotions, according to the Agriculture Department, will present “a favorable image of Christmas trees to the general public,” with the intent of improving the public “perception” of Christmas trees and, hence, their sales. Okay, the betting pool starts here: How long will it be until the first “Federal Christmas tree tax” waiver is issued? Probably when the first Christmas tree farm is unionized. If real tree sales don’t pick up as a result of this initiative, look for a “cash for artificial tree clunkers” program to be introduced by next Christmas to get the faux alternatives off the streets. **Written by Doug Powers Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

See the original post here:
A Christmas Tree Tax?