**Written by Doug Powers Charles Rangel doesn’t really have a problem with President Obama using executive orders to implement items from the “jobs bill” without having to go through Congress. It probably means a little less work in the undrained swamp , which translates to more nap time , so if Obama should do it some more, Rangel still won’t mind : TheDC asked Rangel if he thinks there are other areas where Obama should bypass Congress. “I do, but I don’t want it to be interpreted that I welcome the executive branch using their powers instead of having the legislative branch do it. It’s necessary now because it’s a gridlock between the president and the United States. I hope that is just so very, very unusual,” Rangel told TheDC after a rally on Capitol Hill Wednesday. We’ll have to keep Charlie’s opinion on file in case a Republican is elected president and Congress remains divided — I’m sure his position would remain consistent: Update: That was quick : President Obama signed two more executive memorandums today, saying they will help employment at a time when congressional Republicans are blocking his $447 billion jobs bill. “With too many families struggling and too many businesses fighting to keep their doors open, we can’t wait for Congress to take action,” Obama said in a statement, echoing a political point he has made throughout this week. Flashback to May of 2008. Candidate Obama wasn’t a fan of a “president with too much power” back then, and I don’t think Rangel was either (h/t HAP ): (h/t Weasel Zippers ) **Written by Doug Powers Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

Visit link:
Charles Rangel: Obama Working Around Congress is Okay Because of the Gridlock

**Written by Doug Powers It’s hard to blame Sheriff Joe for getting testy — the Republicans are trying to keep his side from implementing higher levels of patriotism , and Biden doesn’t like it one bit : The president today continued to make the case for a big deal, arguing that if they’re going to draw heat for the deal, they should at least do more than make a down payment on the deficit – they should get the country on sounder financial footing and begin to seriously bend the deficit cost curve. During another exchange, Republicans were going through proposed tax increases as bad for jobs. “C’mon, man!” Vice President Biden exclaimed, “let’s get real!” Be quiet and eat your peas , Joe. As for raising the debt ceiling, Charles Rangel has already asked “What would Jesus do?” Another Dem has also asked and answered the question “What would Reagan do?” “Ronald Reagan would have accepted this plan,” one of the Democratic officials said. I can’t speak for the Gipper, but when Reagan was president the national debt was around $2 trillion , so a plan to raise the ceiling to over $16 trillion might have had him throwing jelly beans at everyone in sight. Today’s debt meeting is at 3:45 at the White House. Will Biden once again be frustrated to the point of blowing out plugs like an ungrounded power strip in a downpour? We’ll see. **Written by Doug Powers Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

Read the rest here:
Joe Biden Wants GOP to ‘Get Real’ on Raising Taxes

Tagged with:
 

Half of all Americans don’t pay federal taxes on their income. And neither, apparently, does General Electric, the multi-national company that reaped $14.2 billion in profits last year. Though G.E. is the largest corporation in the U.S., it did not have to pay a dime in U.S. taxes, according to the New York Times . In fact, the company claimed $3.2 billion in tax benefits. That may be hard to fathom for the millions of American business owners and households now preparing their own returns, but low taxes are nothing new for G.E. The company has been cutting the percentage of its American profits paid to the Internal Revenue Service for years, resulting in a far lower rate than at most multinational companies. Its extraordinary success is based on an aggressive strategy that mixes fierce lobbying for tax breaks and innovative accounting that enables it to concentrate its profits offshore. G.E.’s giant tax department, led by a bow-tied former Treasury official named John Samuels, is often referred to as the world’s best tax law firm. Indeed, the company’s slogan “Imagination at Work” fits this department well. The team includes former officials not just from the Treasury, but also from the I.R.S. and virtually all the tax-writing committees in Congress. According to the Times, “one of the most striking advantages of General Electric is its ability to lobby for, win and take advantage of tax breaks.” These tax breaks are incredibly important to G.E.–so important that G.E.’s head tax man got down on his knees and begged Rep. Charles Rangel to let a particularly lucrative one extend past its expiration date in 2008: The head of its tax team, Mr. Samuels, met with Representative Charles B. Rangel, then chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, which would decide the fate of the tax break. As he sat with the committee’s staff members outside Mr. Rangel’s office, Mr. Samuels dropped to his knee and pretended to beg for the provision to be extended — a flourish made in jest, he said through a spokeswoman. In an interesting sub-section of the article, the Times claims that G.E.’s tax strategy flies in the face of Ronald Reagan’s legacy: In the mid-1980s, President Ronald Reagan overhauled the tax system after learning that G.E. — a company for which he had once worked as a commercial pitchman — was among dozens of corporations that had used accounting gamesmanship to avoid paying any taxes. “I didn’t realize things had gotten that far out of line,” Mr. Reagan told the Treasury secretary, Donald T. Regan, according to Mr. Regan’s 1988 memoir. The president supported a change that closed loopholes and required G.E. to pay a far higher effective rate, up to 32.5 percent. That pendulum began to swing back in the late 1990s. G.E. and other financial services firms won a change in tax law that would allow multinationals to avoid taxes on some kinds of banking and insurance income. The change meant that if G.E. financed the sale of a jet engine or generator in Ireland, for example, the company would no longer have to pay American tax on the interest income as long as the profits remained offshore. President Obama recently tapped G.E. CEO Jeffrey Immelt as his liaison to the business world. Immelt also serves as the chair of the President’ Council on Jobs and Competitiveness. The story is that Immelt and Obama may discuss reforming the corporate tax code–not that Immelt has any incentive to!

More here:
Guess Which Company Paid $0 in Taxes (on $14.2 Billion in Profits)? Hint: Its CEO Works for Obama

Tagged with:
 

Rangel Censured for Ethics Violations

On December 3, 2010, in Uncategorized, by Barry Munz

The House voted to impose the rarely used punishment of censure on New York Democratic Rep. Charles Rangel for nearly a dozen ethics violations.

Read more:
Rangel Censured for Ethics Violations

Rangel resorts to begging

On December 2, 2010, in Uncategorized, by

No one likes to see a grown man beg – unless of course it’s Charlie Rangel. Any regular Joe would be in jail if they did the things he did. So, while sad, I can’t imagine there are too many tears being shed across America as old Charlie grasps at straws. From the AP : WASHINGTON — Rep. Charles Rangel of New York asked 25,000 campaign donors Wednesday to call the Capitol switchboard and urge their representatives to vote against censuring him for ethical misconduct. I’m sure the operators are very, very busy right now answering all those calls of support for Charlie Rangel. Imagine if the rest of the 306, 981, 550 people in America who don’t support Rangel called the Capitol switchboard? That would be something if that many people called (202) 224-3121. I’m just saying.

See the original post:
Rangel resorts to begging

Rangel Seeking House Leniency

On November 29, 2010, in Uncategorized, by Barry Munz

Rep. Charles Rangel hopes to make one last plea for leniency in his ethics case before the House votes on whether he should be censured for 11 rules violations.

The rest is here:
Rangel Seeking House Leniency

I am not a crook!  Cut me some slack!  I am just a serial offender of House Ethics rules.  Or something.  (Need a few more yuks?  Charlie’s previous last stand on the House floor can be seen above.) ( Politico ) — Rep. Charles Rangel is ready to make a last stand to salvage his reputation and tell the House that a censure should be reserved for crooked politicians. He will argue that he’s not one of them. The 80-year-old Democrat from New York wants his punishment for ethics violations downgraded to a reprimand, according to congressional and nongovernment sources who are in touch with Rangel but are not authorized to be quoted by name. Rangel will ask the House ethics committee chairman, Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., for time to plead his case on the floor of the House , where he has served for 40 years, including a stint as chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee. The ethics committee voted, 9-1, on Nov. 18 that Rangel should be censured for committing 11 counts of fund-raising and financial misdeeds that violated House rules. There is precedent for Rangel’s argument that censure – the most severe punishment short of expulsion – is too harsh in his case. It won’t be easy because he’ll have to overcome the overwhelming vote of a committee that has an equal number of Democrats and Republicans. Rangel plans to argue that censure has been imposed for violations including bribery, accepting improper gifts, personal use of campaign funds and sexual misconduct; none is present in his case . The ethics committee, in explaining its recommendation, agreed in a report that the discipline usually is reserved for lawmakers who enrich themselves. In Rangel’s case, the committee said, its decision was based on “the cumulative nature of the violations and not any direct personal financial gain.” The committee’s chief counsel, Blake Chisam, responding to a question from a committee member, told Rangel’s ethics trial that he saw no evidence of corruption. The House will take up Rangel’s discipline in the postelection session that resumes Monday, but no date has been set for decide his punishment. To the public, a censure and a reprimand appear similar. Both punishments are meted out on the floor of the House and include a vote disapproving a member’s conduct. A censure goes beyond the vote and requires the disciplined member to appear at the front of the chamber – called the “well” – and receive an oral rebuke from the speaker that includes a reading of the resolution. A reprimand is simply a vote of disapproval. It can be a separate resolution or a vote to adopt the ethics committee’s findings. The punished lawmaker is not required to stand in the well.

Read the rest here:
Rangel (D-Swinging in The Wind) Wants to Plead His Case on House Floor – Again.

Rangel Pleads for Mercy

On November 19, 2010, in Uncategorized, by kohler

An emotional Rep. Charles Rangel asked for mercy from the House ethics committee before panel members said they would seek a House vote to censure the 80-year-old lawmaker.

The rest is here:
Rangel Pleads for Mercy

The House Ethics Committee is now holding an open hearing on corruptocrat Democrat Charlie Rangel’s sanctions for violating 11 of 13 ethics charges. Rangel is in the room. He is flanked by Democrat Rep. John Lewis. You can watch the livestream at CSPAN3 online now. More from CSPAN3: After the committee meets in an open session, they will proceed behind closed doors to vote on the disciplinary measures. They will then send a final report to the U.S. House so that action they recommend may be taken. Rangel, who was recently reelected to his 20th term in office, is not expected to face the most severe punishment, which would be expulsion from the House, but other penalties range from a reprimand to paying a fine. The 11 violations include filing flawed financial-disclosure statements and the misuse of a rent-controlled apartment. To repeat: Deliberations will take place behind closed doors. Long live transparency! Rangel pleads for “fairness” and “mercy,” after whining about being “ smeared :” Harlem Rep. Charles Rangel admitted he made “mistakes,” then claimed he was “smeared,” and finally pleaded for “a drop of fairness and mercy” in a rambling statement Thursday. “I have been smeared with allegations of corruption and personal gain,” Rangel said. Rangel released his statement just before he was to learn his punishment from the House panel that found him guilty two days ago of 11 ethics violations. “I was and am disappointed that the Committee reached its decision without affording me the right to adequately defend myself with the aid of counsel,” Rangel wrote. The 80-year-old lawmaker neglected to mention that it was his decision to show up for his ethics trial without a lawyer – and then boycott the proceedings after the panel refused his request for a delay. Self-delusion in full bloom at Rangel’s site: “No evidence of corruption.” Leave your predictions on what degree of wrist-slap the House ethics panel will recommend… *** GOP Rep. Jo Bonner blasts Rangel’s “arrogance.” “It is painful for me to say this to a man whom I personally respect, but Mr. Rangel can blame no one other than himself for the position he finds himself in…he should only look in the mirror for who to blame.” House ethics panel chief counsel Blake Chisam reviews past punishments issued by committee ranging from expulsion to letters of reprimand. Chisam blasts Rangel’s “sloppiness” and “carelessness” in filing his own taxes and public disclosure documents while overseeing tax laws for everyone else. “Public office is public trust. [Rangel] violated that trust.” Chisam: “Reprimand would not be inconsistent with precedent…however…something more than a reprimand but less than a censure would not be appropriate…we cannot ignore the fact that [Rangel] was ranking chairman…as a result, I respectfully submit that this committee…recommend…censure…” 12:56pm Eastern Rangel has been rambling for the past 15 minutes or so, at times defiant, saying he doesn’t want to relitigate the ethic trial he skipped out on — and then proceeding to relitigate it. Rangel says he doesn’t want to be “self-serving” & praise himself for his 50 years in government, so he brought Rep. John Lewis to do it for him. But before turning over the mic, Rangel pats himself on the back. John Lewis on Rangel: “I don’t know the facts in this case…” But proceeds to extol Rangel for marching for civil rights, anyway. Ian Schwartz at RCP has the embarrassing vid. 1:30pm Eastern Panel is now in executive session behind closed doors to determine final degree of wrist-slap. 2:59pm Eastern Rangel gave closing statement before panel re-adjourned to decide on sanctions. Pleaded not to be labeled “corrupt.” Invoked God, apologized for any embarrassment. Crocodile tears welled up in his eyes. Pity party to be continued. 7:08pm Eastern . Ethics panel recommends censure, 9-1 .

Continue reading here:
Rangel wrist-slap hearing convenes; House ethics chief counsel recommends censure; Rep. Lewis plays the race-baiting stooge; Charlie chokes up: I am…

Rangel Found Guilty of Ethics Violations

On November 17, 2010, in Uncategorized, by kohler

A House ethics panel found Charles Rangel guilty of 11 of the 13 counts of violations lodged against him.

Read the original:
Rangel Found Guilty of Ethics Violations

Tagged with: