The news makes sense to me — after all, he probably has more experience with them than anyone else on DC’s city council. As you might recall, Barry spent six months in federal prison after the FBI caught the DC mayor smoking crack cocaine in a sting operation in 1990. For some reason, however, the Huffington Post calls Barry, now a city council member,   an “unlikely” proponent of the decriminalization of marijuana: The fight to decriminalize marijuana possession in Washington, D.C., just got an unlikely ally: former mayor and current city councilman Marion Barry (D-Ward 8). Barry and fellow council member Tommy Wells (D-Ward 6) are  drafting legislation that would reduce or eliminate criminal penalties  for people caught with small amounts of marijuana. “It’s time we enter the 21st century and stop criminalizing people… for what is not really a major crime,”  Wells told The Washington Post . Related: Obama is marred by scandals, but Bush & Cheney are still the bad guys Surprise: Obama brother’s charity faced no hurdles in IRS approval Bad medicine: Pediatric doctors on Capitol Hill lobbying for… gun control? Follow Meredith Jessup on Twitter Follow Meredith Jessup on Facebook Read more stories from TheBlaze Baby Dies After Man Allegedly Tricks Girlfriend Into Taking an Abortion Pill Obama Dodges Big Question on IRS Scandal Joe Scarborough Blows Up at David Axelrod Over DOJ/AP Records: ‘Save That for Somebody Else That’s Going to Buy Into That’ Incredible: Official in Charge of IRS Office Responsible for Conservative Targeting Now Heads Agency’s Obamacare Office Beck Ties Together Benghazi, IRS, & AP Scandals: ‘Fundamental Transformation’

Link:
Surprise: DC’s Marion Barry is working to decriminalize drugs

Tagged with:
 

Well said: When the Bush administration was wracked with the leaks of classified information about its counter-terrorism policies, most notably its interrogation and electronic surveillance programs, Democrats in Congress happily took advantage of the information. Nary a peep was heard about protecting national security and preventing the media from publishing classified information. But now President Obama has to live in the leak-happy world that he and his colleagues created to undermine the last administration. And they don’t like it. Unlike the Bush administration, however, they are willing to go to lengths that threaten the freedom of the press to stop it — this administration has conducted far more investigations and prosecutions for leaking than its predecessors. And, for the most part, this administration has gotten away with it from the press, which has given them a pass on civil liberties compared to how they treated Republicans. I deplore the Obama administration’s assault on freedom of the press. But I have no sympathy for the AP or the mainstream media, because this is how you get treated when you are in a politician’s pocket. If the AP’s editors and reporters and their colleagues at other newspapers had been more adversarial toward this President, as they were with President Bush, they would been treated with far more respect. The AP should wish for a return of the days of a Republican administration, which considered the press a worthy adversary, rather than a servant to be mistreated at will. – John Yoo, Ricochet.com Related: Obama asks Congress to pass a new ‘press shield’ law Obama is marred by scandals, but Bush & Cheney are still the bad guys Media groups protest DOJ’s AP ‘overreach’ Follow Meredith Jessup on Twitter Follow Meredith Jessup on Facebook Read more stories from TheBlaze Baby Dies After Man Allegedly Tricks Girlfriend Into Taking an Abortion Pill Obama Dodges Big Question on IRS Scandal Joe Scarborough Blows Up at David Axelrod Over DOJ/AP Records: ‘Save That for Somebody Else That’s Going to Buy Into That’ Incredible: Official in Charge of IRS Office Responsible for Conservative Targeting Now Heads Agency’s Obamacare Office Beck Ties Together Benghazi, IRS, & AP Scandals: ‘Fundamental Transformation’

More:
Notable & Quotable: The media reaps what they sow

Tagged with:
 

Dick Cheney — TV star? Get a candid look at the former vice president in “The World According To Dick Cheney,” premiering Friday, March 15th: The Hollywood Reporter describes it thus : Critical (though never aggressive) in its script but a pushover in the interviewer’s chair, R.J. Cutler and Greg Finton’s The World According to Dick Cheney offers a respectable summation of the former vice president’s career but reveals little if anything we don’t already know. A film that would need to offer insight, new facts or provocation to make sense at this moment in history instead has a single effect: to ratchet up expectations for Errol Morris’ forthcoming Donald Rumsfeld picture, with the hope-against-hope that Morris, who has elicited so many self-revelations in his career, might get something interesting out of this gang. Follow Meredith Jessup on Twitter Follow Meredith Jessup on Facebook Read more stories from TheBlaze California Police Chief: ‘A Gun Is Not a Defensive Weapon — That Is a Myth’ Missouri Dems Introduce Alarming Gun Confiscation Bill Giving Law-Abiding Gun Owners 90 Days to Turn in Certain Firearms or Become Felons Dr. Carson Tells TheBlaze How Obama Reacted to His Bold Prayer Breakfast Speech: ‘I Figured He Would Just Be Fuming’ Heroic ‘Super Dad’ Dies Protecting His 11-Year-Old Daughter From Armed Home Invaders Famed Investor Trashes State of the Union Address: Makes You Wonder Whether Obama Is ‘Delusional’ Or ‘Lying’

Read more here:
Check it out: ‘The World According to Dick Cheney’

Tagged with:
 

There’s no mention here of the killing of Awlaki’s 16-year-old son (who I doubt was a “senior operational leader” of al Qaeda), but other than that, a great editorial, ” King of Drones “: President Obama has been lucky in many ways, but no more so than in not having a Senator Barack Obama to assail his use of Presidential war powers. For surely Senator Obama would now be denouncing the ways that President Obama has embraced the unilateral, even pre-emptive powers that George W. Bush used in prosecuting the war against al Qaeda. The latest example is the leak to NBC News of a Justice Department “white paper” that summarizes the legal justification for using drones to kill al Qaeda operatives, including American citizens. The white paper summarizes a more detailed legal explanation from Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) that remains classified—again, like the habits of the supposedly too secretive Bush Administration. You may recall that Mr. Obama and Eric Holder, before he became Attorney General, denounced the OLC memos that explained why waterboarding and other “enhanced interrogation” techniques were legal. Once he became Attorney General, Mr. Holder ostentatiously made four of those memos public on April 16, 2009, along with plenty of moral preening about how the new Administration had banned that sort of barbarism. Yes, this crowd doesn’t arrest and interrogate suspected terrorists. It merely blows them away with missiles from the sky. Hypocrisy aside, the Justice Department makes an adequate legal case. If John Yoo or Dick Cheney had written it, the document would no doubt be less defensive in asserting executive powers. There might be less talk about “balancing analysis” and more of Constitutional prerogatives. But the Obama paper gets to the correct legal conclusion. The white paper is naturally being denounced on the anti-antiterror left, which only shows how out of this world these critics are. They claim the Administration has no legal basis for drone strikes, but that ignores the Authorization for Use of Military Force passed by Congress after 9/11 and various National Defense Authorization Acts. Both explicitly give the President the power to capture and kill members of al Qaeda and its allies who have taken up arms against the U.S. Critics shout that the white paper is a license to kill anyone, anywhere, but that is also false. The memo limits the targets to “a senior operational leader” of al Qaeda “or its associated forces.” Congress deliberately included the latter phrase because al Qaeda is a loose network that can strike in many places. It recognizes that this is a long conflict that will be fought in many places and that jihadists will seek new sanctuaries. But the white paper is not a justification to start targeting Tamil Tigers or Karen rebels in Burma. As for the alleged lack of judicial review, a sure way to lose a war is to require that judges approve a list of enemy targets on the battlefield. In its Bush-era rulings, the Supreme Court merely allowed detainees the right of habeas review once they are in custody. It did not say a judge should have to approve drone strikes or determine who could or couldn’t be attacked in battle.

See original here:
Wall Street Journal Defends Obama Administration’s Secret Drone Program

Tagged with:
 

A woman wears a GOP elephant pin on the back of her dress during the final day of the Republican National Convention at the Tampa Bay Times Forum on August 30, 2012 in Tampa, Florida. (Photo: Getty Images) New York Times op-ed columnist Maureen Dowd recently wrote an article proclaiming that the Mayans were right when they predicted the end of the world in December 2012.  She just added one modifier — it will be the end of the world of the Grand Old Party. She creatively hypothesized: The Mayans were right, as it turns out, when they predicted the world would end in 2012. It was just a select world: the G.O.P. universe of arrogant, uptight, entitled, bossy, retrogressive white guys. Just another vanishing tribe that fought the cultural and demographic tides of history. Someday, it will be the subject of a National Geographic special, or a Mel Gibson movie, where archaeologists piece together who the lost tribe was , where it came from, and what happened to it. The experts will sift through the ruins of the Reagan Presidential Library, Dick Cheney’s shotgun casings, Orca poll monitoring hieroglyphics, remnants of triumphal rants by Dick Morris on Fox News, faded photos of Clint Eastwood and an empty chair, and scraps of ancient tape in which a tall, stiff man, his name long forgotten, gnashes his teeth about the 47 percent of moochers and the “gifts” they got. Instead of smallpox, plagues, drought and Conquistadors, the Republican decline will be traced to a stubborn refusal to adapt to a world where poor people and sick people and black people and brown people and female people and gay people count. As the historian Will Durant observed, “A great civilization is not conquered from without until it has destroyed itself from within.”   ​[Emphasis added] Dowd proceeded to highlight the perceived flaws of Mitt Romney’s 2012 campaign, beginning with the fact that “awkward gazillionaire” Mitt Romney was even chosen as the nominee, to the party’s stance on social issues. She then made a not-so-subtle “Republicans are racist” reference, comparing the Republican Party to the Confederacy: As Eva Longoria supersedes Karl Rove as a power player, Republicans act as shellshocked as the Southern gentry overrun by Yankee carpetbaggers in “Gone with the Wind.” As the movie eulogized: “Here was the last ever to be seen of Knights and their Ladies Fair, of Master and of Slave. Look for it only in books, for it is no more than a dream remembered, a Civilization gone with the wind.” Gun sales have burgeoned since the president’s re-election, with Black Friday weapons purchases setting records as the dead-enders rush to arm themselves.   ​[Emphasis added] And if they’re not finished in 2012, Dowd concludes with giddiness, history will recall 2016 as the year when Republicans were finally “wiped from the earth…when the relentless (and rested) Conquistadora Hillary marched in, General Bill on a horse behind her, and finished them off.” Read TheBlaze’s original series on the future of the GOP here .  (H/T: WeaselZippers ) Follow Erica Ritz on Twitter Read more stories from TheBlaze Shock Video: Union Activists Attack, Punch Conservative Outside Mich. Capitol Do Gays Have a Constitutional Right to Marry? Here’s Why Activists Fear Losing Their Supreme Court Battle ‘Dehumanizing’ Gays? Justice Scalia Defends His Views on Banning Gay Marriage During Princeton Speech Is It Okay for Christians to Smoke Marijuana? Young Penn. Mother Tells Teens to ‘Get a Job’ When They Ask for a Cigarette — And They Kill Her

Here is the original post:
NYT’s Maureen Dowd: Mayans Were Right, GOP ‘Universe’ of ‘Bossy, Retrogressive White Guys’ to Become Extinct in 2012

Tagged with:
 

Following up on my earlier commentary on Obama’s push to codify his illegal killing regime, it turns out Kevin Gosztola of Firedoglake used that New York Times report to attack Mitt Romney as some kind of a neocon warmonger-in-waiting. See, ” Obama Administration Was Not Willing to Trust Romney With a Secret Kill List .” Having posted on the topic, I called out Gosztola on Twitter. Typical leftist hypocrite couldn’t defend his own writing and instead resorted to childishly calling me a “whackjob.” Whackjob RT @ ampowerblog Why give Obama a pass? is.gd/KNTBE6 Beef of that story is buried in your piece and you know it — Kevin Gosztola (@kgosztola) November 25, 2012 I also pointed out that progressives called for Bush-Cheney war crimes prosecutions under the incoming Obama administration: @ kgosztola Remember how Bush/Cheney were war criminals and all that? If you believe, Obama’s 100 times worse. is.gd/KNTBE6 #Drones — Donald Douglas (@AmPowerBlog) November 25, 2012 And no surprise, but it was Gosztola himself who was leading the charge to put Dick Cheney on trial. See this one of many entries at Firedoglake, ” Torture Decriminalized: How the State Department Provides Space for the Culpables’ Book Tours “: Former Vice President Dick Cheney, who should be investigated and tried for war crimes that include but are not limited to torture and abuse of detainees, has mounted a tour to publicize his memoir In My Time. Waterboarding has historically been considered torture and a war crime yet he is able to go on Dateline on NBC News and tell Jamie Gangel that he would strongly support using it again. He is also able to go on and express support for wiretapping and secret prisons, which seem to be mechanisms an authoritarian and not a democratic society would use. That post then goes on to attack the Obama administration for not mounting prosecutions against the Bush-Cheney cabal. This was a common refrain on the radical left at the time of election in 2008, that a new administration should not close the book on the past. Leftists argued that the Bush administration should be brought before the bar of history, with progressives attacking President-elect Obama’s pledge “to look forward as opposed to looking backwards.” Here’s more from Gosztola’s post : In July 2008, the New York Times published an editorial on the “disturbing victory” the Bush administration had won when a federal appeals court ruled the administration could “continue to detain Ali Al-Marri,” who had “been held for more than five years as an enemy combatant.” They noted the “sweeping power” could deprive citizens as well as noncitizens of freedom. Al-Marri, a Qatar citizen, was legally residing in the US. He was arrested in Peoria, Illinois, on “ordinary criminal charges” and seized and imprisoned by the military. The evidence in support of his secret detention was based on “thin hearsay evidence” and also based on the fact that he had been in an army and carried arms on a battlefield, which makes it even more difficult to celebrate al-Marri as a case that is an example of the Obama administration’s efforts to renew respect for the rule of law. What the letter plainly shows is the contempt the State Department and Obama administration has for addressing the lawlessness of the Bush administration. With Cheney’s book tour to defend torture underway, the letter takes on even more significance. He is someone, who is culpable for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Yet, it is next to impossible to mount a prosecution when the Obama administration has decriminalized the Bush administration torture regime by arguing steps have been taken to leave behind that unsavory past. It’s hypocrisy all the way down with these idiots. As I pointed out earlier, the fact is, from the left ‘s human rights perspective, the Obama administration’s national security policies are exponentially more grievous than any U.S. administration in history. But all the anti-Bush agitation was never about human rights or humanitarian international law. It was about raw power and revenge against political enemies. If progressives truly cared about human rights abuses we should be seeing antiwar protests across the globe, on the scale of the protests on the eve of the Iraq war in 2003. President Obama himself campaigned in 2008 as the most far-left candidate since George McGovern, but since taking office has eliminated virtually nothing from the Bush administration’s national security program. Indeed, Fox News confirmed that the CIA was holding prisoners at the Obama administration’s black site in Benghazi. What’s worse is that Obama’s secret prisons are in violation of his own administration’s executive order abolishing extraordinary rendition and secret overseas prisons. People like Kevin Gosztola know all of this, but in the service of progressive power are not only giving the president a pass on the massive illegality of the kill list regime, but have in fact aided and abetted a cover-up of the Benghazi murders to perpetuate Democrat power in Washington. That’s the real crime here. The historical fucking moral bankruptcy of the left, people who will stop and nothing to keep political power, and thus expand the vicious leftist power grab in government even if innocent people are killed.

Link:
FDL’s Kevin Gosztola Wanted Bush-Cheney War Crimes Prosecutions But Gives Obama a Pass on Unprecedented Violations of International Law

I don’t think it’s “probably” one of the worst, but Liz Cheney hammers the administration all around:

See the original post:
One of Worst Cover-Ups in the History of the Republic

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin was in rare form last night when she joined FOX News’ Greta Greta VanSusteren to discuss issues ranging from the Chick-fil-A controversy to Vice President Dick Cheney’s statement that she was a poor choice for Sen. John McCain’s presidential campaign in 2008. The segment opened with the controversy surrounding the fast-food chain. VanSusteren asked Palin why she was jumping in to support the restaurant (recently, Palin Tweeted in support of Chick-fil-A). Rather than focusing upon the issue of gay marriage, Palin said her support was rooted in a dislike for the ban that has been advanced against the company. “I’m speaking up for him and his First Amendment rights and anyone else who would wish to express their — not anti-gay people sentiment — but their support for traditional marriage,” Palin said, referring to Chick-fil-A president Dan Cathy. “President Obama and Joe Biden — they both supported the exact same thing until just a few months ago when they had to flip-flop to shore up the homosexual voter base.” The politician went on to call the poor treatment of Chick-fil-A and the calls for bans on the food establishment ”intolerant, bigoted, hypocritical“ and ”narrow-minded.” As for Cheney, who recently said that it was “a mistake” for Palin to be chosen for vice-president in 2008, the former Alaskan governor had plenty to say. When VanSusteren asked Palin about this statement, she passionately responded, saying that she was honored to have been chosen as a candidate and that it would have been a mistake for her not to accept the nomination. Here’s her full response: “The mistake would have been me just deciding that, ‘Hey I love my 86, 87 percent approval rating up there in Alaska as the governor moving and shaking and watching corrupt politicians and businessmen to go prison for crony capitalism. Working on 16 to 20 percent of domestic energy supplies being able to be increased via Alaska’s resource development. Ethics reform legislation that I was working on — that led to that 86 percent approval rating. I could have decided, you know, I don’t want to be blooded up, I don’t want my family to go through what we will have to go through in order to put ourselves forward in the name service to this country. But I did it. It would have been a mistake to have hunkered down — just lived that luxurious…comfortable lifestyle in Alaska…We like so many people in this country decided, we will do all that we can in order to defend our republic, put America back on track. And I believe I did the right thing in accepting that call.” Watch the entire interview, below (passionate response to Cheney starts around 7:23): Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com Follow Billy Hallowell on Twitter Follow Billy Hallowell on Facebook Read more stories from TheBlaze Genealogists’ Shock Claim: Obama Is Likely a Descendant of the First American Slave (Through His Mother!) Harry Reid Makes Wild Claim About Mitt ‘Homophobic & Hurtful’: Gay Activists Protest Kirk Cameron’s Pro-Marriage Speech in NJ ‘A Part of America That Is Hidden in Plain Sight’: Former CNN Anchor Decries Racism After Getting Pulled Over Romney Aide Loses His Temper With Reporters in Poland: ‘Kiss My A**’

Read the original here:
Sarah Palin Delivers Passionate Response to Dick Cheney‘s Claim That She Was ’A Mistake’ & Calls Chick-fil-A Protests ‘Bigoted’

Tagged with:
 

(Photo: Getty Images) Mayor Bloomberg, also known as “ Nanny Bloomberg ” thanks to his many regulations for New York City, has gone a step beyond banning sugary sodas and trans fats, according to the New York Post.  Now, it seems he is also trying to regulate breast milk. (Related: No More Big Gulps: New York City to Ban Sale of Large Sodas and Sugared Drinks) According to the Post, Bloomberg is actually pushing hospitals to keep their baby formulas “behind locked doors” so that new mothers will be more likely to breastfeed.  Participating hospitals will begin on September 3d. The New York Post has more : The nanny state is going after moms. Under the city Health Department’s voluntary Latch On NYC initiative, 27 of the city’s 40 hospitals have also agreed to give up swag bags sporting formula-company logos, toss out formula-branded tchotchkes like lanyards and mugs, and document a medical reason for every bottle that a newborn receives. While breast-feeding activists applaud the move, bottle-feeding moms are bristling at the latest lactation lecture. “If they put pressure on me, I would get annoyed,” said Lynn Sidnam, a Staten Island mother of two formula-fed girls, ages 4 months and 9 years. “It’s for me to choose.” Under Latch On NYC, new mothers who want formula won’t be denied it, but hospitals will keep infant formula in out-of-the-way secure storerooms or in locked boxes like those used to dispense and track medications. With each bottle a mother requests and receives, she’ll also get a talking-to . Staffers will explain why she should offer the breast instead. “It’s the patient’s choice,” said Allison Walsh, of Beth Israel Medical Center. “But it’s our job to educate them on the best option.” (Photo: nyc.gov) Read more about the “Latch On NYC” initiative by clicking here . Like Bloomberg’s other regulations, the breast milk policy bears a resemblance to Cass Sunstein’s “nudge” theory.  The Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (also known as the “ Regulatory Czar “), Sunstein has long-advocated “nudging” Americans in the direction they really ought to go, by defining their choices and making the less desirable ones more inconvenient.  No one is forcing you to do anything…just helping to guide your decisions. But for many, regulating soda and regulating breast milk are two different matters entirely.  The latter, obviously, feels much more invasive. Back in April, when Bloomberg was just proposing the regulations, even Whoopi Goldberg told the mayor to “back off.” Watch her segment from The View, below: Lisa Paladino of Staten Island University Hospital crystallized the “nudge” comparison when she said: “The key to getting more moms to breast-feed is making the formula less accessible…This way, the RN has to sign out the formula like any other medication. The nurse’s aide can’t just go grab another bottle.” One commenter simply asked : “Why is Bloomberg so obsessed with what we put in our mouths?” Apparently mothers have the “right to choose” an abortion in New York City, but if they “choose” bottle-feeding they’ll receive a stern talking-to, endorsed by the government. Follow Erica Ritz on Twitter Read more stories from TheBlaze ‘Way Over the Line’: Idaho Billboard Compares Barack Obama to Suspected Murderer James Holmes Dick Cheney: Picking Sarah Palin for VP Was a ‘Mistake’ Beck Delivers Epic ‘Restoring Love’ Speech: ‘History Breathes. It Doesn’t Belong Behind Glass. It Belongs to You’ Westboro Shows Up in Dallas to Protest Beck — And Wait Until You Hear One Anti-Westboro Protester’s Shock View ‘I Am the Real Joker’: James Holmes Copycat Threatens Washington, DC

Link:
Locking Up Baby Formula? Bloomberg Slammed for Newest Breastfeeding Initiative

Tagged with:
 

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and husband Todd visited a Chick-fil-A on Friday. CNN used the Pink song “Stupid Girls” to lead into a report about it. (Image source: Facebook) A CNN segment on Sunday morning started off a report about 2008 Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin showing her support for Chick-fil-A with the pop song “Stupid Girls.” NewsBusters flagged the segment , which featured the Pink song as a lead in to host Randy Kaye’s discussion: [Music and lyrics]: Aha, aha. Stupid girl, stupid girls, stupid girls. Maybe if I act like that… RANDI KAYE, ANCHOR: Sarah Palin is apparently hungry for chicken and controversy. She posted this on Twitter and Facebook: “Stopped by Chick-fil-A in the Woodlands to support a great business.” That is her and her husband Todd. Chick-fil-A has come under fire after, we were just telling you, after its president Dan Cathy came out in opposition to same-sex marriage. Several communities now trying to block Chick-fil-A from coming into their cities. Fellow Republican Mike Huckabee has organized that Chick-fil-A appreciation day scheduled for Wednesday. Jazz Shaw at Hot Air observed that cable news anchors generally have nothing to do with the bumper music selected for their segments, usually handled by production staff instead. “CNN can – and probably will – easily say that it was all a coincidence and it might be hard to prove otherwise,” Shaw wrote. Last year, then-Republican presidential candidate Michele Bachmann was introduced on “Late Night with Jimmy Fallon” to the song “Lyin’ Ass Bitch.” NBC ultimately apologized to Bachmann for the off-color song choice. (h/t Drudge Report ) Follow Madeleine Morgenstern on Twitter Read more stories from TheBlaze ‘Way Over the Line’: Idaho Billboard Compares Barack Obama to Suspected Murderer James Holmes Dick Cheney: Picking Sarah Palin for VP Was a ‘Mistake’ Beck Delivers Epic ‘Restoring Love’ Speech: ‘History Breathes. It Doesn’t Belong Behind Glass. It Belongs to You’ Westboro Shows Up in Dallas to Protest Beck — And Wait Until You Hear One Anti-Westboro Protester’s Shock View ‘I Am the Real Joker’: James Holmes Copycat Threatens Washington, DC

Here is the original post:
The Bachmann Treatment? CNN Plays ‘Stupid Girls’ Before Report About Sarah Palin & Chick-Fil-A

Tagged with: