Okay, the pictures below are from last night’s screening and presentation of Pamela and Robert’s film, ” The Ground Zero Mosque – The Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks .” The crowd in attendance was mostly baby-boomers and retirees. But folks were passionate and very receptive of the program. This was the first time I’d seen the whole thing through. (I saw the first 10 minutes of the movie at CPAC.) It’s an excellent documentary which deserves a wide screening. And during the Q & A, Pamela and Robert again developed their theme of combating the lamestream media’s enabling of sharia at home. Of course Pamela’s talk was outstanding as usual. She reminded the audience that if we want to preserve our country and our security, we have to do it ourselves. “When you wake up in the morning, after rubbing the sleep from your eyes, ask yourself what are you going to do today to save the republic?” She got lots of applause. And for good reason. It’s shocking sometimes to see things in their totality, but the movie does that, illustrating what’s essentially media malpractice — and then Pamela and Robert bring it all home at the wrap-up discussion. Now, while Pamela was pleased to report that so far not a brick has been laid at the Cordoba Mosque, er, Park51 initiative, the battle is far from over. And Another protest is planned for Ground Zero on September 11th. We’re going to need it. See, for example, the lastest whitewash on the Hamas-backing Ground Zero developer Sharif El-Gamal at the April 5th Los Angeles Times , ” The Man Behind the Manhattan Mosque .” More later …

Read the rest here:
Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer: ‘The Ground Zero Mosque – The Second Wave of the 9/11 Attacks’, Calvary Chapel, Mission Viejo, April 9, 2011
At New York’s Metro News , ” 9/11 Play Canceled at the 11th Hour .” And at Pamela’s, ” WPIX TV Interview with Pamela Geller on Daisy Khan/Rauf Cancellation of Cordoba Event Exploiting 911 Tragedies for Shameless Promotion “:
See the rest here:
Protests Force Cancellation of Cordoba Initiative Event
What else is new? Well, actually, whereas once Spencer ” Insha’Allah ” Ackerman called for President Bush to be executed at The Hague , now he’s reduced to appealing to the 43rd president to argue religious pluralism should prevail in the Cordoba Mosque controversy: The small-minded passions of Westerners who think that they’ve found a threatening global conspiracy emerging from an ancient Abrahamic faith now have damaging strategic implications. All of which is to say that old-fashioned American religious pluralism is a weapon against al-Qaeda. Or, as the 43rd president of the United States put it, America’s vital interests and our deepest beliefs are now one . Spencer Ackerman, JournoList alumnus, is one of the most despicable left-wing frauds on the web. He’s also one of the most pathetic.
Go here to see the original:
Spencer ‘Insha’Allah’ Ackerman Slurs Victory Mosque Opponents as ‘Bigots’
On November 10, 1938, the Gestapo, the SS and various Nazi Youth and other brown-shirt militias launched a massive pogrom against Jews in Germany. The “Night of the Broken Glass,” the attacks resulted in nearly 100 Jews murdered and tens of thousands rounded up and shipped to concentration camps. Kristallnacht is widely considered the initial stage of the Nazi regime’s “final solution” to the Jewish problem. It would seem pretty evident to any reasonable person in America today that the country’s treatment of Muslim Americans doesn’t even remotely resemble the persecution of Jews during the interwar period of German history, and then into WWII and the Holocaust. But if we’ve learned anything about the political left in the last few years (if not sooner) it’s that the one political gambit that continues to pay off for Democrats and radicals is the claim of “discrimination.” We’re fortunately seeing some very successful pushback against the left’s incessant claims of racism, but it’s going to take continued efforts to beat back the lies and slanders that form the central discourses on the left-wing today. My latest case in point is Andrew Sprung’s entry,” Kristallnacht in New York? ” Sprung points to the New York Times ‘ coverage yesterday, highlighting the passage suggesting that opponents “aggressively scrutinize” donors to the Cordoba Project. The highlighted section also quotes Dan Senor, who said there’d be “a real stigma associated with this project.” Senor published one of the more thoughtful essays on the whole debate at yesterday’s Wall Street Journal , ” An Open Letter on the Ground Zero Mosque .” Your stated goal of interfaith and cross-cultural understanding is a good one-one that we all share and have devoted considerable energy to furthering. It may well be that this goal would be furthered still by the building and operation of Cordoba House. However, while we will continue to stand with you and your right to proceed with this project, we see no reason why it must necessarily be located so close to the site of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. I hardly see how such concerns warrant vicious comparison to Gestapo anti-Semitic pograms in the 1930s, but that’s where we are with today’s radical left. Everything’s about racism, discrimination, homophobia, hate speech, etc. Unreal. But one more example of a refusal of anti-conservatives to look at the issues dispassionately, and discuss things reasonably. RELATED : At National Review , ” Not at Ground Zero ,” via Memeorandum .

Follow this link:
Kristallnacht in New York?
The Anti-Defamation League is in the news for condemning bigotry while embracing it? See Jeffrey Goldberg, ” A Terrible Decision by the Anti-Defamation League “: 1) The organization behind the project, the Cordoba Initiative, is a moderate group interested in advancing cross-cultural understanding. It is very far from being a Wahhabist organization; 2) This is a strange war we’re fighting against Islamist terrorism. We must fight the terrorists with alacrity, but at the same time we must understand that what the terrorists seek is a clash of civilizations. We must do everything possible to avoid giving them propaganda victories in their attempt to create a cosmic war between Judeo-Christian civilization and Muslim civilization. The fight is not between the West and Islam; it is between modernists of all monotheist faiths, on the one hand, and the advocates of a specific strain of medievalist Islam, on the other. If we as a society punish Muslims of good faith, Muslims of good faith will join the other side. It’s not that hard to understand. I’m disappointed that the ADL doesn’t understand this. I’m still not convinced that the Mega Mosque builders are all that moderate. That said, who’s stoking whose pain here ? The political debate on this is getting ridiculous. It is not racist to oppose the mosque. I have a hard time believing that supporters of the mosque are that quick to dismiss opponents as “racist.” It just plays into the left’s meme. Whenever a conservative stands up for what they believe they’re attacked as bigots. But, hmm … no such a big outcry when The Divider in Chief slurs blacks as mongrels, etc., etc. It all relates friends. Where’s the consistency? See also, ” Imam Feisal and the Ground Zero Mosque .” RELATED : ” Anti-Defamation League Opposes Ground Zero Mosque .”

Excerpt from:
The ‘Moderates’ at Ground Zero
