**Written by Doug Powers This week DHS Director Janet Napolitano visited Indianapolis to secure the perimeter of Lucas Oil Stadium. Even the food vendors, now referred to in DHS circles as the elite “Meal Team Six,” have been trained to assist in the counterterrorism effort : Despite acknowledging there are “no credible or specific threats” to the safety of the 2012 Super Bowl in Indianapolis on Sunday, the TSA is training thousands of fast food sellers and other vendors to spot terrorists under the “First Observer” program. “TSA said over 8,000 stadium vendors, parking lot attendants, shuttle bus drivers, and other transportation professionals received the agency’s First Observer training for detecting and assessing indicators and planning tactics of potential terrorist activities,” reports Government Security News. At last year’s Super Bowl they tried having local restaurant maître d’s ask patrons waiting to be seated, “terrorist or non-terrorist?” Unfortunately, nobody fell for it. If “First Observer” turns out to be a success, the Joe Biden can koozie vendors at Bank of America Stadium working the final day of the DNC Convention will be similarly trained. So if you’re at the Super Bowl, make sure to let J-Nap know if you spot anything out-of-the-ordinary. **Written by Doug Powers Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

See the original post:
Latest Addition to the Super Bowl Counterterrorism Squad: Hot Dog Vendors

Reuters – The Obama administration asked intelligence agencies for additional assessments of the risks of transferring five senior Taliban detainees to a third country as part of efforts to broker peace with Afghan militants, U.S. spy chiefs told Congress on Tuesday.

Read the rest here:
U.S. assessing risks of Taliban transfer: Petraeus
(Reuters)

The New York Police Department is taking heat following revelations that a documentary about the threat of radical Islam was screened to nearly 1,500 officers during training.

The New York Police Department is facing intense scrutiny following revelations Monday that a film about the threat of radical Islam was screened to nearly 1,500 officers during training. Critics of the 2008 documentary “The Third Jihad” have denounced it as “anti-Islam” and ” hate-filled .” The Council on American-Islamic Relations called it ” anti-Muslim propaganda .” The 72-minute film exposes what it calls a strategy by radical Muslims to “infiltrate and dominate America,” and features grisly images from jihadist terror attacks, Muslim leaders calling for an Islamic world order, and goes after CAIR, among other organizations, for having radical ties. “Islamism is like a cancer,” one interviewee says. “You either defeat it or it will defeat you.” News that the film was shown during NYPD training first broke in January 2011: NYPD spokesman Paul Browne initially told the New York Village Voice that officers never saw the film, calling it a “wacky movie” that was “reviewed and found to be inappropriate.” Browne later amended that statement, saying that upon further review the film had been shown “a couple of times when officers were filling out paperwork before the actual coursework began.” “It was not approved for the curriculum. It’s not shown for any purpose now,” Browne told the Village Voice. But one year later, documents obtained through the state’s Freedom of Information Law indicated otherwise: The film was shown “on a continuous loop” for between three months and one year of training, and was seen by at least 1,489 police officers, the New York Times reported Monday. New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg on Tuesday blasted the police department, saying someone had used “terrible judgment” in showing the film. “Somebody exercised some terrible judgment,” Bloomberg said. “As soon as they found out about it, they stopped it.” Of particular note was the fact that New York Police Department Commissioner Ray Kelly himself appeared in the film as an interviewee: On Monday, Browne said Kelly’s appearance was lifted from old interview footage. But the next day, the police department shifted and confirmed Kelly did participate , after the film’s producer provided the date and time of the interview to the Times. Kelly said he regrets appearing in the film. Others featured include former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, former U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge, former CIA Director James Woolsey, Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman and about a dozen other intelligence and Middle East experts and activists. CAIR used the NYPD’s admission to call for the resignations of both Kelly and Browne — coming at a time when sentiments between CAIR and the NYPD are particularly inflamed over recent reports that the police department used spy tactics to keep tabs on Muslim groups in an effort to catch terrorists. “This controversy has moved beyond an issue of poor judgment in the use of an Islamophobic training film to an issue of the integrity of public officials,” CAIR said in a statement Wednesday. “The lack of truthfulness exhibited by Commissioner Kelly and Deputy Commissioner Browne means New Yorkers must now question the credibility of every statement they make. This situation necessitates their immediate resignations.” Anti-Muslim? But despite seething objections that the film is anti-Muslim and anti-Islam, “The Third Jihad” explicitly states that it is about radicalism only. “This is not a film about Islam. It is about the threat of radical Islam. Only a small percentage of the world’s 1.3 billion Muslims are radical,” a statement reads at the beginning of the film. Narrated by Zuhdi Jasser, a devout Muslim and founder of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy, the film describes what it says is the true agenda of much of the Muslim leadership in America: A kind of “grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within,” based on a 15-page manifesto from the Muslim Brotherhood. Among the strategies outlined in the document, the film says, are to set up mosques and Islamic centers to achieve the ultimate goal of “sabotaging the miserable houses of the West so that Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.” Organizations listed that can help carry out these goals include the Muslim Students Association, the Islamic Society of North America and the Islamic Association for Palestine — a Hamas-linked organization whose three officers founded CAIR in the 1990s. “Islam will dominate….We want to see Shariah here, and it will be,” a member of the New York-based Islamic Thinkers Society vows in one clip. The film shows several images taken from Muslim websites: An Islamic flag flying over the White House, an hourglass depicting the inevitability of countries around the world falling to Islam and an American flag with the words “Under Shaytan Authority.” In Islamic theology, “shaytan” is the term for “devil.” “When groups like these talk about wanting to create a global Islamic state and Islam dominating the world, you realize that they hold some of the same goals as Al Qaida and millions of radicals around the world, and that’s what make them dangerous,” Jasser narrates. ‘A slander against the film’ In a telephone interview with The Blaze, Jasser — who has been a repeat guest on Glenn Beck’s show — said the media’s treatment of the film as “anti-Muslim” shows “the death of journalism.” “[The film] is a wake up call to the threat that is in our community,” he said. “Not one report has attacked the facts in the documentary. To call it anti-Muslim is slander against the film.” He said CAIR’s announcement Wednesday that it’s calling for the NYPD commissioner’s resignation shows the organization only wants to use the situation “as a tool to attack Commissioner Kelly.” “What type of documentary does CAIR want shown?” he asked. He said he finds it curious that it’s suddenly become “a major federal crime” that the film was shown to a group of police officers when it’s been available online for the past several years. “The more [CAIR] can take up the bandwidth of the discussion about the threat of the radical Islam with victimization issues…the less work they have to do for reform,” Jasser said. “They don’t want anybody becoming educated about the slippery slope of political Islam, which is the movement of trying to put into place their own Shariah law…they look upon us as not just a faith group but as a global political movement.” Alex Traiman, a spokesman for the Clarion Fund, which financed the film, said he also sees the response to the current media controversy as “CAIR trying to take down the New York Police Department.” According to its website , the Clarion Fund is a nonprofit organization that “produces and distributes documentaries on the threats of radical Islam” and lists former Reagan deputy defense secretary and Center for Security Policy founder Frank Gaffney Jr. among its advisory board members. In a telephone interview with The Blaze, Traiman referred to CAIR’s response as “their tried and true method of demonizing anyone who asks real questions by just labeling it Islamophobia.” “CAIR is targeted specifically in our film for doing exactly what they’re doing now,” he said. Despite the controversy, Jasser said he stands firmly behind the film. “The reason I agreed to narrate is that there are many of us within the Muslim community that are a part of, if you will, a “jihad against jihad,” he said. “I’d much rather have people see that a Muslim is part of the solution. The solution has to come from within.” Watch an abbreviated version of “The Third Jihad” below:

Excerpt from:
‘A Slander Against the Film’: Narrator Says Documentary Shown to NYPD Officers Isn‘t ’Anti-Muslim’

Tagged with:
 

A flack for Media Matters for America, the Soros-backed one-trick GOP-bashing pony, sent an e-mail peddling the group’s latest anti-Keystone XL “study” to the Senate Democrats’ communications director at the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, Mary Kerr. For some reason, Senate Republican EPW communications director Matt Dempsey with GOP Sen. James Inhofe’s office also ended up cc’ed on the e-mail. Ooops. Their mistake is our gained insight (or rather, confirmation of what we already assumed). Read on: From: Emilee Pierce [mailto:epierce@mediamatters.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2012 09:11 PM To: Kerr, Mary (EPW); Dempsey, Matt (EPW) Subject: Heads up – MMFA study on media coverage of KXL out tomorrow Mary and Matt, I wanted to flag that MMFA will be putting out a major, quantitative report on media coverage of KXL tomorrow morning. The study will be similar to our EPA counting study (http://mediamatters.org/research/201106070010) — and will drill home the point the media bought right into Big Oil’s desired frame on KXL, focusing largely on the (inflated) number of jobs that could be created, without paying due attention to the many other important issues at stake. (Ranchers’ land, spills, climate change, etc.) We are hoping for a big media splash, but – more importantly – we’re hoping that allies will be able to leverage it to gain favorable coverage. I’ve pasted a very brief summary below – and will be sure to send along the final study as soon as it’s up. If you have any questions, please let me know. All the best, Emilee STUDY: The Press And The Pipeline A Media Matters analysis shows that as a whole, news coverage of the Keystone XL pipeline between August 1 and December 31 favored pipeline proponents. Although the project would create few long-term employment opportunities, the pipeline was primarily portrayed as a jobs issue. Pro-pipeline voices were quoted more frequently than those opposed, and dubious industry estimates of job creation were uncritically repeated 5 times more often than they were questioned. Meanwhile, concerns about the State Department’s review process and potential environmental consequences were often overlooked, particularly by television outlets. – ————————————– Emilee Pierce External Affairs Director for Climate and Environment Media Matters for America Matt Dempsey e-mails: “It’s not often that Senator Inhofe’s office receives emails of a heads up to promote the Media Matters agenda! So I will do my part and share with you tonight to help them get the ‘favorable coverage’ they want from their ‘allies’ on Capitol Hill.” We know at least one Democrat recycling the Media Matters talking points: Chicago Democratic Rep. Jan Schakowsky (Ill.), who tried arguing today that 20,000 jobs “is not that many.” Chicago Democratic Rep. Jan Schakowsky (Ill.) drew fire from Sen. Dan Coats (R-Ind.) on Wednesday when she dismissed the proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline, suggesting the 20,000 jobs it could create were relatively insignificant in the scheme of the greater economy. “Twenty thousand jobs is really not that many jobs, and investing in green technologies will produce that and more,” she said on Chicago’s WLS Radio Don Wade and Roma Show on Wednesday morning. “But I’ll tell you what, you know it seems to me that the Republicans would rather have an issue than a pipeline.” Coats, a vocal proponent of the project, which would transport oil from Alberta, Canada, to America’s Gulf Coast, swiftly responded in a separate interview on the same show later on Wednesday morning, suggesting Schakowsky has spoken insensitively. “Tell that to the 20,000 people that woke up this morning and didn’t have a job to go to,” said Coats. “ ‘Well, these don’t really matter’ — I mean, this not only is jobs, this is less dependence on Middle East oil.” “And here we have, you know, the president talking about becoming energy independent, but he turns down the easiest way to do that,” the freshman senator continued.

Read more here:
E-mail of the day: Media Matters coordinates with Capitol Hill “allies” on Keystone XL; Plus: 20,000 jobs “is not that many”

Reuters – President Barack Obama entered the White House in 2009 carrying an olive branch for Iran, determined to show the world that Washington would not play the villain in a relationship marked by blood and bitterness over three decades.

View original post here:
Obama’s olive branch to Iran turned into sanctions hammer
(Reuters)

Tagged with:
 

Well, I’ve just finished scouring the White House visitor logs. Regular readers know I seem to be one of the few in the media who actually does such a thing. Regular readers also know that I’ve pointed out time and again that the logs are incomplete, misleading, obtuse, and designed to make it as difficult as possible to figure out who has visited and when. So, it is no surprise that neither director Tim Burton nor actor Johnny Depp — hosts of the big 2009 Hollywood Halloween bash at the White House — show up in the visitor logs. At least as far as I can tell. Use the search function and look for yourselves. White House Visitor Records Requests Powered by Socrata This is a screen cap of the 10/31/09 list where Burton’s name should be (click for full size ): And this is a screen cap of the 10/31/09 list where Depp’s name should be (click for full size ): Actress Mia Wasikowska, who played Alice, was also at the White House for picture-taking, along with several other cast members. Her name is also missing from the logs. On FanPop via Verum Serum , several photos show the celebs posing inside the White House: The party held in the State Dining Room and East Room benefited military families — always a good thing. That’s besides the point. The Tinseltown cover-up , hushed to avert bad press when the economy was stuck in a recession and the Tea Party was on the rise, simply underscores the cloud-based transparency that has marked this administration from day one. It is laughable that the White House reaction is to call the story “ old news ” — when the White House visitor log keepers apparently have yet to be told of the visits. Looks like disclosure-subverting business as usual. *** Flashback: Obama’s Coffee House Loophole Archive of previous Obama transparency posts here .

See the original post here:
Why don’t White House visitor logs report Hollywood Halloween guests?

Tagged with:
 

Well, I’ve just finished scouring the White House visitor logs. Regular readers know I seem to be one of the few in the media who actually does such a thing. Regular readers also know that I’ve pointed out time and again that the logs are incomplete, misleading, obtuse, and designed to make it as difficult as possible to figure out who has visited and when. So, it is no surprise that neither director Tim Burton nor actor Johnny Depp — hosts of the big 2009 Hollywood Halloween bash at the White House — show up in the visitor logs. At least as far as I can tell. Use the search function and look for yourselves. White House Visitor Records Requests Powered by Socrata This is a screen cap of the 10/31/09 list where Burton’s name should be (click for full size ): And this is a screen cap of the 10/31/09 list where Depp’s name should be (click for full size ): Actress Mia Wasikowska, who played Alice, was also at the White House for picture-taking, along with several other cast members. Her name is also missing from the logs. On FanPop via Verum Serum , several photos show the celebs posing inside the White House: The party held in the State Dining Room and East Room benefited military families — always a good thing. That’s besides the point. The Tinseltown cover-up , hushed to avert bad press when the economy was stuck in a recession and the Tea Party was on the rise, simply underscores the cloud-based transparency that has marked this administration from day one. It is laughable that the White House reaction is to call the story “ old news ” — when the White House visitor log keepers apparently have yet to be told of the visits. Looks like disclosure-subverting business as usual. *** Flashback: Obama’s Coffee House Loophole Archive of previous Obama transparency posts here .

Read more:
Why don’t White House visitor logs report Hollywood Halloween guests?

Tagged with:
 

Occupy Wall Street New Year’s Blitzkrieg

On January 3, 2012, in Uncategorized, by curits

My post on Occupy the Rose Bowl garnered some linkage. See Atlas Shrugs, ” New Years Blitzkrieg: Obama Endorsed #OWS Occupy Nazis Use Jew Hating Iconography to Crash and Destroy Rose Parade, and in NYC #OWS Stab NYPD, Destroy Zuccotti Park .” And at Instapundit and Memeorandum . And also, Director Blue, ” Nice: Occupy Movement Crashes Rose Parade with 70-Foot Octopus “Float” That Pins Economic Woes On… Well, You Know “: This is the modern Left in action. It tries to divide Americans against one another: rich vs. poor, black vs. white, union vs. non-union, urban vs. rural, you name it. This kind of rhetoric defies American tradition and, furthermore, it’s downright dangerous. Nothing good can come from demonizing arbitrary groups of Americans. Well, you don’t say. RELATED : At JammieWearingFools, ” OWS Stunner: Berkeley Grad With Lengthy Arrest Record Charged With Stabbing NYPD Officer ,” and Weasel Zippers, ” Occupy Albany Goons Post “Wanted” Poster Threatening Police Officer And Family… ” Plus, at Gateway Pundit, ” Eugene City Councilor Asks For Police Protection After #Occupy Goons Hold Second Protest Outside His Home… Topless (Video) .” And at Marathon Pundit, ” Occupy Occtrocities: OccuFail at Zuccotti Edition .” BONUS #OWS at BCF . EXTRA : A preview for the caucuses, from Astute Bloggers, ” PRELUDE: OWS SCUM CRASH ROSE BOWL. CLIMAX: OWS WILL CRASH IOWA’S GOP CAUCUSES .”

See the article here:
Occupy Wall Street New Year’s Blitzkrieg

General Electric has agreed to pay $70.4 million to settle a criminal probe and civil claims brought against the corporation for having allegedly conspired to rig bids on U.S. municipal bond deals, overcharging state and local governments on their investments. GE’s settlement stems from an investigation into the conduct of three now-former GE employees between 1999 and 2004 at a unit of the finance division that was discontinued in April 2010, GE said in a statement today. “Our in-depth investigations have uncovered pervasive corrupt practices in the municipal securities reinvestment market, and we are requiring financial firms one by one to step up and pay the price for their misconduct,” said Robert Khuzami, the director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. The deal GE struck will resolve investigations by the Justice Department, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Internal Revenue Service, as well as the attorneys general of 25 states. GE Funding Capital Markets Services, a former unit, is the fifth company to enter into a settlement as part of a more than five-year federal investigation. “GE Funding’s former traders entered into illegal agreements to manipulate the bidding process on municipal investment contracts,” said Sharis A. Pozen, acting assistant attorney general in charge of the Justice Department’s antitrust division. “This anticompetitive conduct harmed municipalities as well as taxpayers.” GE, the largest U.S. conglomerate, said on Friday that it “exited the business in question in April 2010” and that the three employees who were involved in the scandal are no longer working for it. The settlement brings the total amount so far paid by companies to end the case to $743 million. Bank of America, JPMorgan, UBS , and Wells Fargo previously settled similar cases. (Related: Netflix Faces Barriers to European Expansion) GE said it was “pleased” to have resolved the matter and that it had already accounted for the settlement costs in prior quarters. Currently, there is no word as to whether the eighteen people who have been charged–and the 9 who have pleaded guilty–are “pleased.” (h/t Huffington Post ) [ Editor's note: portions of the above originally appeared on Wall St. Cheat Sheet . ]

More here:
GE Pays out $70.4 Million to ‘Resolve’ Bid-Rigging Investigations

A new ad from UNICEF Sweden is meant to encourage viewers to give gifts of charity during the Holiday Season, but has the punchline and vibe of an Occupy Wall Street propaganda linking Santa Claus to the 1 percent. Could the United Nations Children’s Fund be the latest participant in the War on Christmas?  While giving charitable donations in others names as gifts may be a noble gesture, the brash and cold Saint Nick presented in the commercial seems like an odd way to entice viewers to purchase UNICEF stocking suffers such as malaria tablets, rehydration bags and polio vaccines. “I don’t do poor countries,” says Santa in a malevolent tone closing the commercial. He is followed by the UNICEF message “We go where Santa doesn’t — Buy your Christmas gifts at unicef.se.” What Christmas movies do you think this director grew up watching? (H/T: New York Daily News)

More here:
New UNICEF Ad Says Santa Doesn‘t ’Do Poor Countries’