At New York Times (where else?), ” The Nutria, a Rodent Promoted as ‘Guilt-Free Fur’ .” Okay, sure, this is not a particularly attractive animal. And apparently these varmints are wreaking havoc on the Lousiana environment. But it’s not like minks are all that much more cuddly (minks are cousins to weasels , for that matter). But now the former is becoming a politically acceptable alternative to the latter, which just goes to show that there’s absolutely no intellectual integrity to the extremist animal rights movement. People either reject fur apparel, and hence eliminate demand for furry animals, or they stop yapping about how people who like luxurious coats are animal murderers. It’s pretty simple, and wholly pathetic: TREATING nutria as a kind of “guilt free” fur is tough when you’re cutting the pelt and fur gets caught in your eyes. That’s what Micha Michelle Melancon, a fashion designer in New Orleans, found out when she was making a cloak from what is commonly known as a swamp rat. “This is an animal,” Ms. Melancon said, after her work space became filled with fluffy piles of excess fur. “A soft, furry, once-living-and-breathing being.” But unlike other soft and furry animals, nutria is being rebranded as a socially acceptable and environmentally friendly alternative way to wear fur. The effort culminates this Sunday, when Ms. Melancon and about 20 designers take part in a “righteous fur” fashion show at the House of Yes, an art space in Williamsburg, Brooklyn. Fluffy hats, muffs, leg warmers and even a wedding dress will be paraded down the runway, in a show expected to draw about 150 people. Don’t look for any celebrities in the front row. A reporter from National Geographic and someone who works at Marc Jacobs are among the expected V.I.P.’s. But Nutria-palooza, as the show is being called, is not just about fashion. The main sponsor is the Barataria-Terrebonne Estuary Foundation, a nonprofit conservation group in Thibodaux, La., that works to preserve the 4.2-million-acre swamp in southern Louisiana that is being threatened by the furry critter. As any resident of Louisiana knows, nutria is a herbivorous rodent, about half the size of a beaver, that is native to South America. The animals were shipped to fur farmers in the United States as early as the 19th century, and some eventually escaped into the Louisiana swamps. At first, the population was kept in check by fur trappers and a marketplace that prized the exotic fur. Hollywood starlets like Greta Garbo were fans of nutria coats. But when the fur market started to founder in the 1980s, the nutria population soared and started to endanger the fragile ecosystem. The invasive rodent eats away the bottom of the plants that hold the coastal wetlands together. In 2002, Louisiana started paying trappers and hunters $5 for every nutria killed. The effort to control the nutria population had some success, with bounty hunters killing about 400,000 animals last year. But the carcasses were simply discarded or left to rot in the swamp. That’s when Cree McCree, an environmentalist and designer from New Orleans, came up with her fashion idea. Instead of wasting all that fur, she wanted to market nutria as a “guilt-free fur that belongs on the runway instead of at the bottom of the bayou,” she said. “If they’re being killed anyway,” she added, “then why not make something beautiful out of them?” Lame justification. The animals don’t “need” to be killed in the first place. The “fur market started to founder” because of the left’s attacks on the fur industry. And now that things are out of whack in the bayou, Voilà! Kill ‘em all and let the “EVIL” marketplace sort ‘em out? If these environmentalists were really worth their salt they’d find a way to balance the ecosystem naturally, without having to kill the poor rodents. What a joke.

Read more:
‘Guilt-Free Fur’ Reveals Total Hypocrisy of Animal Rights Movement

Scott Brown Will Vote for Dodd-Frank Bill

On July 12, 2010, in John Kerry, Uncategorized, by If Bush Did It

**Written by guest-blogger Doug Powers I wish Scott Brown wouldn’t feel the need to ask himself “what would Teddy do” before deciding how to vote. Brown is saying he’ll go along with the Democrats on the Dodd-Frank financial regulation bill : Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown said on Monday that he will support the financial regulation overhaul, becoming one of the Republicans needed to moved one of the Obama administration’s key pieces of legislation into law. Brown had announced that he would oppose the compromise bill that had been negotiated by the House and Senate, but shifted his support after bargainers went back to the table and restructured about $19 billion in payments that was opposed by banks in Brown’s state. A final Senate vote could come this week. “I appreciate the efforts to improve the bill, especially the removal of the $19-billion bank tax. As a result, it is a better bill than it was when this whole process started. While it isn’t perfect, I expect to support the bill when it comes up for a vote,” Brown said in a prepared statement. Brown joined Sen. Susan Collins of Maine as two crucial Republican votes for the legislation. I knew we were in trouble when Brown started bicycling with John Kerry . Fittingly enough, Brown was against Dodd-Frank before he was for it. Francois has taught his student well. This is the same bill about which Chris Dodd, one of its authors, said “No one will know until this is actually in place how it works.” We have to pass it so we know how it works? I want to get these slimy jerkweeds on an airplane, lock them in, tell them the plane was manufactured by a bunch of guys with a history of shady dealings and zero experience in aeronautics, tell them “nobody knows if this will work until we’re airborne” and see how many of these worms wet themselves when the plane starts taxiing down the runway. Chris Dodd and Barney Frank — two of the many reasons we’re in such financial trouble — are also the architects of the effort to “fix” the problem. “Hope & Change!” Thanks for going along with it, Senator Brown, but it’s nothing that Marcia Coakley, or Ted Kennedy for that matter, couldn’t or wouldn’t have done. **Written by guest-blogger Doug Powers Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

Read more:
Scott Brown Will Vote for Dodd-Frank Bill