Feds require consumer-friendly health plan briefs (AP)

On February 9, 2012, in Uncategorized, by petreewild969

AP – Don’t have the slightest clue what your health insurance covers?

See more here:
Feds require consumer-friendly health plan briefs
(AP)

Tagged with:
 

Reuters – Timothy Dolan, a senior U.S. Roman Catholic leader, said on Thursday President Barack Obama “gave me promises” during a White House meeting in November as Dolan pressed the Church’s criticism of a new Obama administration rule requiring health insurance plans to cover birth control.

Originally posted here:
Senior U.S. Catholic cites Obama "promises" on birth control
(Reuters)

Reuters – The Obama administration is willing to work with Catholic universities and hospitals in implementing new rules that require health insurance to cover birth control, a top adviser to the president’s re-election campaign said on Tuesday.

See the original post:
White House says open to compromise over contraception
(Reuters)

AP – A list of states and their uninsured population, grouped according to the progress they have made in establishing health insurance exchanges, a linchpin for expanding coverage under President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul law.

View original post here:
States are all over the map on health overhaul
(AP)

AP – Colorado Christian University has a filed a lawsuit challenging the Barack Obama administration’s health care legislation requirement that the morning-after pill be provided by health insurance plans.

See the original post:
Colorado college sues over birth control provision
(AP)

GOP Voters Skeptical of Mitt Romney

On November 25, 2011, in Uncategorized, by KavinHildring485

At Los Angeles Times , ” Mitt Romney still faces a trust deficit with GOP voters .” As other Republican candidates have stumbled their way toward the presidential primaries, Mitt Romney has put together what would seem to be all the elements of a winning campaign: an effective staff, a robust treasury and smooth, knowledgeable performances both in debates and on the trail. But for months, the threshold of support for the former Massachusetts governor hasn’t inched above a quarter of Republican voters in national polls. For many GOP voters in early primary states, hesitation about Romney comes back to one thing: their perception that he has routinely molded his views to suit the political mood, with ambition his overriding principle. “He’s not a person we could trust to lead our country,” said Angela Cesar, a 41-year-old Republican from Ypsilanti, Mich., who said Romney had changed his position on too many issues. “He’s going to be listening to voices outside. I want someone who can hear his own voice — a clear voice.” Steve Holroyd, a 54-year-old chef from Rye, N.H., was initially attracted to Romney’s candidacy, but now describes him as evasive: “The more I listen to him, the more he just kind of flip-flops and doesn’t know where he stands on anything.” Romney’s advisors say the argument that their candidate is a political contortionist will not resonate because voters are concerned about the economy — and little else. But in his failed 2008 bid, when the issue was raised — as now — by opponents, it hit its mark not because of the issues involved but because of what Romney’s flip-flops suggested about his character. The campaign demonstrated sensitivity to the problem in this race: Romney has strongly defended the health insurance mandate that he instituted in Massachusetts, even though it is reviled by GOP voters, rather than reverse himself on it. Romney’s aides have also leveled charges of flip-flopping at GOP rival Rick Perry and at President Obama, who Romney strategist Stuart Stevens said has “a new slogan and a new mission every day.” Asked about the criticism during a recent Michigan debate, Romney said: “I think people understand that I’m a man of steadiness and constancy.” Steadiness and constancy. Right. Video: Via Right Klik .

Read more here:
GOP Voters Skeptical of Mitt Romney

Flashback: Newt Backs Obamacare’s Individual Mandate Requiring Health Insurance

Go here to see the original:
Flashback: Newt Backs Obamacare’s Individual Mandate Requiring Health Insurance

It’s Not Just About the Millionaires

On November 12, 2011, in Uncategorized, by NatK

The kind of realities most folks don’t talk about. From Adam Davidson, at New York Times : It serves the interest of both parties to argue about taxes on corporations and the wealthy because neither wants to discuss the alternative, which is where things get touchy. To solve our debt problems, we have to go to where the money is — the middle class. People who earn between $30,000 and $200,000 a year make a total of around $5 trillion and pay less than 10 percent of that in taxes (owing mostly to tax incentives and the fact that most families make less than $68,000, where larger tax rates begin). Increasing the middle-class tax burden an additional 8 percent, however, would actually have a bigger impact than taxing millionaires at 100 percent. Still, many experts say we don’t need to raise the tax rate on the middle class; we just need to get rid of some of those despised loopholes (or beloved incentives). Most reform proposals suggest gradually eliminating the most popular tax deductions, like mortgage interest rates ($120 billion per year) and workplace health insurance ($200 billion per year). Regardless, most economists acknowledge, and most politicians privately concede, that the middle class will have to give up some benefits (Social Security, Medicare) or it will have to pay more in taxes. Actually, it will probably have to do both. The millionaires will be paying more, too. Leading Democrats are proposing a nearly 10 percent hike. RELATED : ” Occupy Michael Moore .”

Read more from the original source:
It’s Not Just About the Millionaires

Gov. John Richard Kasich (Image: AP)

Ohio Senate Bill 5, the new collective bargaining law, was overturned Tuesday after an expensive union-backed campaign. But Ohioans also voted “no” to forced health care. As of 11:30 PM, 1,932,502 voted to overturn the collective bargaining law (with only 1,218,959 in favor of it) whereas 2,004,169 voted in favor of the anti-forced health care initiative (with only 1,042,232 opposed). Therefore, although voters rejected GOP Gov. Kasich’s bill, they also voted in favor of a ballot initiative that rejects President Obama’s Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act . Nevertheless, Democrat opponents of the collective bargaining bill are celebrating. AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said victory for unions was achieved among “Democrats and Republicans in urban and rural counties.” “Ohio sent a message to every politician out there: Go in and make war on your employees rather than make jobs with your employees, and you do so at your own peril,” he said. At a celebration at a downtown Columbus hotel, Ohio Democratic Party Chairman Chris Redfern said Republicans and Kasich overreached. “He literally thought he knew more than everyone else,” Redfern said. Asked whether the collective bargaining law, called Issue 2 on the ballot, was a referendum on Kasich, Redfern said, “Absolutely. He was the face of the campaign. John Kasich chose to put his face on this campaign for the last eight weeks. The people of the state pushed back.” However, recall in the above the number of Ohioans who voted to overturn the collective bargaining bill (1,932,502) and compare it to those who were in favor of it (1,218,959). Now compare the number of Ohioans who voted for the anti-forced health care initiative (2,004,169) compared to those who favored universal health care (1,042,232). Perhaps it wouldn’t be unfair to say that there was more than one referendum tonight. “It’s clear that the people have spoken,” Gov. Kasich said according to the Wall Street Journal . He said he would continue to work with local governments facing budget challenges but warned there would be “no bailout” because “there’s no money.” We Are Ohio, the largely union-funded opponent coalition, painted the issue as a threat to public safety and middle-class workers, spending millions of dollars on TV ads filled with images of firefighters, police officers, teachers and nurses. The strategy must have worked. “The idea that firefighters and teachers are overpaid is preposterous,” said Heather Reese, a 25-year-old student at Ohio State University who voted to repeal the law, in the Journal report. “I thought it was wrong . . . I just think it’s extremely unfair,” said Nancy Beadle, a retired teacher from Port Clinton, when she explained to the Chillicothe Gazette why she voted “no.” “It just struck me as a backward thing, and a vindictive thing,” she added. However, not everyone felt that way. “I am unemployed and I paid a lot more of the costs of my insurance,” John Mirgon Sr. of Zanesville told the Gazette. “I don’t think it’s fair that they get to pay the minimal amount and still get all the fringe benefits that the majority of people don’t get.” Labor and business interests poured more than $30 million into the nationally watched campaign, and turnout was high for an off-year election. Opponents of the collective bargaining law reported raising $24 million as of mid-October, compared to about $8 million raised by the committee supporting the law, Building a Better Ohio. Some analysts have predicted that Tuesday’s result in the closely divided swing state will “resonate from statehouses to the White House ahead of the 2012 presidential election.” For opponents of the law, its defeat is anticipated to energize the labor movement, which largely supports Democrats, ahead of President Barack Obama’s re-election effort. Allah Pundit of Hot Air questions whether this defeat for Kasich will have a ripple effect in other areas of the country: A huge defeat for Kasich. I wonder what this means now for the Walker recall effort: Will labor try to capitalize on the momentum or will they back off, having already won a big victory they can tout? That could very well be the case. However, despite voting to overturn SB-5, Ohioans still favored ” Issue 3 .” The Plain Dealer reports: With more than 1.5 million votes tallied, Ohio Issue 3 is winning with more than 66 percent of voters saying “Yes” to the proposal to prevent Ohioans from being forced to participate in a health care system. The official language says it is a proposal to “preserve the freedom of Ohioans to choose their health care.” So now that they have voted “Yes” on Issue 3, what happens? “It guarantees that Ohio could never be a state like Massachusetts with a large government-forced mandate that you purchase health insurance or participate in the health care system,” Jeff Longstreth, campaign manager for Ohioans for Healthcare Freedom,  told The-News-Leader.com . “It’s about rights. In order to enforce the individual mandate at the federal level, the federal government would have to step on the rights of Ohioans, who have a constitutional right to purchase or not purchase health care,” he added. And before analysts and union leaders start claiming that defeating the union bill will result in an explosion of Democrat victories, and that overturning SB-5 is a major GOP referendum, they should consider these points: The collective bargaining bill was overturned (as of 11:30 PM EST) by about a 725,000 vote difference and cost millions of dollars to campaign against. The Issue 3 initiative against universal health care won by almost a million vote difference and received a fraction of the coverage that SB-5 had. If analysts are correct, and these votes are indicative of things to come, the Republicans shouldn’t be the ones worrying. This is a breaking story. Updates will be added. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Follow this link:
Ohio Votes to Overturn Collective Bargaining Law, Votes ‘No’ to Forced Health Care

Tagged with:
 

Republicans’ Not So Secret Weapon in 2012

On September 27, 2011, in barack obama, Health Care, Uncategorized, by AlexisChristensen28

I got an email from a friend of mine yesterday forwarding an email regarding healthcare. I got an email from another friend yesterday doing the same. Both use the same company for health insurance. That company, MetLife, announced right after the 2010 election it would end long-term care insurance. There are a number of companies in the same boat. And the reasons do not all have to do with uncertainty about Obamacare. In fact, in addition to the unexpected future costs to health care companies due to Obamacare and the availability of Obamacare for employee shifting, ridiculously low interest rates, etc. are a contributing factor. But this is becoming more common not just for long term care rates, but general health insurance rates as well. In the examples of both of my friends, MetLife is raising rates 45% on existing employees and denying new employees access to coverage. In effect, MetLife is trying to extricate itself from the business of long term care and charging customers through the nose hoping the customers will drop the policies. This is a not so secret weapon for the GOP in 2012. In addition to inflation and the diminished purchasing power of the middle class because of Barack Obama’s economic policies, his health care policies are jacking up costs as well. The economy will be the message if the GOP can just focus on it instead of the many sideshows the Obama Administration and the media will try to throw at them.

More:
Republicans’ Not So Secret Weapon in 2012