**Written by Doug Powers Sheriff Joe Biden may only half-heartedly believe what he’s saying here. It’s just that word around Capitol Hill is that if you help convince Nancy that her reunion with the Speaker’s gavel is imminent, there’s a good chance she’ll throw a pretty good stock tip your way, so what the heck. From The Hill : House Democrats will win the House in November, swinging the gavel back into the hands of Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Vice President Joe Biden predicted Friday. “Nancy, I think, is not going to be remembered just for being the first woman Speaker,” Biden said, “she’s going to remembered for being the second woman speaker.” Addressing House Democrats gathered on the Eastern Shore for their annual retreat, Biden said the combination of GOP obstructionism and a strengthening economy will propel the Democrats back into control of the lower chamber after just two years in the minority. “It’s becoming absolutely clear the decisions that we made … are actually working,” Biden said, speaking softly because he said he’s battling a cold. It’s sort of a “bad thought, good thought” situation. The bad is that Joe Biden is predicting the Dems will control the House after the election. The good is that in 2010 he predicted the same thing , and, well, you know how that turned out. **Written by Doug Powers Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

See original here:
Biden Prediction: Dems Will Retake House
The House GOP leadership should force House Democrats to vote for or against the Hatch-Lee bill backed by all 47 GOP senators.
Go here to read the rest:
House GOP Should Back Strong BBA
Last week, I alerted you to the fight on the right over the massive omnibus spending bill. Well, it’s 1am Eastern time, and the House just passed the short-term FY 2012 spending bill by a vote of 219-203. 24 fiscal conservatives said no to the $24 billion spending hike. Per Chad Pergram at Fox News: Amash, Austria, Broun, DesJarlais, Duncan (SC), Flake, Franks, Gingery, Graves (GA), Huelskamp, Huizinga, Hultgren, Jordan, King (IA), Lummis, Mack, Mulvaney, McClintock, Pearce, Poe, Schweikert, Walsh, Westmoreland and Wilson (SC). 6 Democrats voted yes and sided with the GOP leadership: Altmire, Holden, Kissell, McCarthy (NY), Michaud and Welch. Boehner’s enticement to win back a few dozen Republicans who had previously revolted? Slicing off some federal funding for Solyndra-style subsidies: House Republicans just after 8 p.m. introduced a new modified continuing resolution, which includes $100 million in cuts to a Department of Energy program called the Innovative Technology Loan Guarantee Program. That program is the one that helped fund Solyndra, an energy company that went bankrupt and has led to Republican inquiries about how the program works. The modification is in the form of an amendment to the continuing resolution that failed in the House on Wednesday. On to the Senate … The 219-203 vote sets up a confrontation with the Senate, where Democratic leaders have vowed to block the measure in a dispute over federal disaster aid. …Reid said the Senate was ready to stay in session next week, potentially canceling its scheduled recess. The House bill would fund the government through Nov. 18. By pushing ahead with a tweaked version of his original bill, Boehner is hoping to jam the Senate with time running out. While the federal government has funding through Sept. 30, the Federal Emergency Management Agency will run out of money by Monday, officials in both parties have said. “I urge the Senate to quickly pass this bill so we can send it to the president and keep our focus on the American people’s top priority: jobs,” Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) said in a statement after the vote. “This common-sense measure cuts spending for the second year in a row and protects our struggling economy from the uncertainty of a government shutdown.” The fight over a tiny sliver of the federal budget brought both parties back to the kind of brinksmanship they sought to avoid upon returning to Washington earlier this month. More than the $100 million cut for Solyndra, GOP lawmakers said it was the Democratic opposition that had drawn conservatives back to the leadership bill. They accused senior House Democrats of playing political games by withdrawing their support only after they saw the Republicans would have trouble passing the bill on their own. Country over politics, yadda yadda yadda.
See the original post here:
Breaking: House passes short-term continuing resolution in dead of night
This just in from The Hill : Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and House Democrats have dropped the word “stimulus” from their vocabulary. Though the House minority leader and her caucus are still pushing an economic stimulus agenda to save the economy, they’ve radically changed their rhetoric with the hope of winning over voters who saw “stimulus” as close to a dirty word. Close to a dirty word? How about a vile, disgusting pile of government waste? Don’t be fooled by the Democrats’ change in rhetoric — they’re cutting “stimulus” out of their wording, but their plans remain the same: Democrats are now being careful to frame their job-creation agenda in language excluding references to any stimulus, even though their favored policies for ending the deepest recession since the Great Depression are largely the same. Indeed, with President Obama scheduled Thursday to lay out his job-creation plans before a joint session of Congress, liberal Democrats and left-leaning policy groups are pressuring him to ignore short-term deficit spending concerns in favor of sweeping spending initiatives designed to boost hiring. Can’t wait, can you?
Go here to read the rest:
Nancy Pelosi not as stimulated as she once was
**Written by Doug Powers Does this mean goodbye “stimulus,” hello “kinetic wealth redistribution action”? Well, the image makeover probably won’t be that honest. In the used car lot of failed government programs, this sales technique is known as “same lemon, different paint job : Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and House Democrats have dropped the word “stimulus” from their vocabulary. Though the House minority leader and her caucus are still pushing an economic stimulus agenda to save the economy, they’ve radically changed their rhetoric with the hope of winning over voters who saw “stimulus” as close to a dirty word. Democrats are now being careful to frame their job-creation agenda in language excluding references to any stimulus, even though their favored policies for ending the deepest recession since the Great Depression are largely the same. Recognizing the unpopularity of the 2009 package, however, Democratic leaders have revised their message with less loaded language – “job creation” instead of “stimulus” and “Make it in America” in lieu of “Recovery Act” – in hopes of tackling the jobs crisis. That’s a sharp shift from last year’s messaging strategy, when Pelosi issued hundreds of press releases touting the benefits of the 2009 stimulus bill in hopes of making believers of skeptical voters. In the four months prior to last November’s elections alone, Pelosi’s office released more than 80 “fact sheets” highlighting media reports about local projects the stimulus law was supporting. In December, that practice abruptly stopped, with good reason. Not only had Democrats been trounced at the polls a month earlier, but also public sentiment had made “stimulus” a radioactive word and “shovel-ready” a running national joke. And yet Debbie Wasserman Schultz thinks that only Republicans are saying the Recovery Act didn’t work ? If the president has another road trip to sell the “Make it in America” plan — whatever that is — will he use the Canadian bus again? (h/t Jammie Wearing Fool ) **Written by Doug Powers Twitter @ThePowersThatBe
Read more from the original source:
Pelosi, Dems Drop ‘Stimulus’ from Vocabulary for Next Spending Plan
You know what they say; one man’s terrorist is another man’s democratically elected congressman. That’s just one of the many lessons of the debt ceiling compromise, a deal that heralds a new era of electrifying political rhetoric. Nazis are out. Jihadists are in. The tea party “acted like terrorists,” Joe Biden reportedly said of negotiations. One reasonable New York Times columnist called the tea party the “Hezbollah faction” of the GOP, and the other advised the radicals to “put aside their suicide vests” — for now. And in a sweeping assault on the tea party, metaphors, syntax and clarity, MSNBC’s Chris Matthews packed everything he’d read on the blogs into a glorious globule of rhetorical confusion. But fret not. Terrorist analogies are welcome when democracy fails to break to the left. Republicans should never refer to the Congressional Progressive Caucus as a bunch of wealth-destroying jihadists who wear suicide vests packed with prosperity-killing stimulus plans. That kind of hyperbole would be catastrophic, leading to violence and/or another alarmist Diane Sawyer television special. But Bob Beckel is just being cute when he discusses the “tea terrorist party” on Fox News. (He later apologized .) And it turns out that the extremist freshman wing of the Republican Party (which wing isn’t extreme, though — am I right?) voted 59-28 in favor of the bipartisan ” sugar-coated Satan sandwich ” debt deal. What kind of namby-pamby hostage takers are these people? (Did you know that 95 House Democrats also voted against raising the ceiling? From what we’ve learned about staggering dangers of fooling around with this policy, we apparently have another 95 nihilists running around D.C.) If you’re wondering why these elected officials, representing their constituents within the system, are the equivalent of terrorists, a Democratic congressman from Pennsylvania bores to the heart of the matter: “This small group of terrorists,” Mike Doyle explained , “have made it impossible to spend any money.” Well, damn near impossible. Washington will have to squeeze by on $43,900,000,000,000 over the next decade while wrestling with real cuts that are likely to rise to zero — or maybe less. If we can’t spend money, who are we as a people? Perhaps it’s because of some psychological ailment such as Stockholm syndrome — and why else would a person believe in libertarian fiscal policy? — that I hope the tea party does a better job next time around. It is, after all, silly watching the establishment celebrate a compromise on debt that adds $7 trillion to the nation’s liability and uses a base line that assumes some pretty significant tax hikes. But you needn’t sympathize with the American Taliban to understand the significance of the day. No amount of hysterics changes the fact that there has been realignment to the national conversation. The country has been radicalized by reality. A new CNN poll finds that though they rightly disapprove with everyone involved, 65 percent of those polled think that cuts in the debt deal were appropriate. Most polls find that voters believe government is too large and favor spending cuts. Remember that polls showed that most voters were against raising the debt limit at all. It’s not the terrorists who drive this change. It’s the evidence. It’s the economic suffering that “spreading it around” policy has created. It’s institutionalization of a recession. For a while, at least, those who claim that bankruptcy spending and bullet trains create jobs — no matter how regularly the media offer these myths as fact — can’t be taken seriously. Fleeting as this shift may be, we were brought a sliver of good news this week. During one glorious day, the United States passed legislation with the sole intention of cutting government rather than “creating” so-called jobs or “investing” in some cockamamie energy boondoggle or “helping” “working families” — which is, of course, the biggest help Washington can offer us. For that, we can thank the “terrorists.” _______________________ Follow @ davidharsanyi

Originally posted here:
Harsanyi: When we balance the budget, the terrorists have won
As I noted over the weekend, it seems the popular meme in liberal circles these days is to compare the tea party to terrorists . Well, add another name to the list of liberal politicians and media personalities who are likening peaceful political dissent to suicidal murder. VP Joe Biden so eloquently spells out that infamous “new tone” for us: Vice President Joe Biden joined House Democrats in lashing tea party Republicans Monday, accusing them of having “acted like terrorists” in the fight over raising the nation’s debt limit. Biden was agreeing with a line of argument made by Rep. Mike Doyle (D-Pa.) at a two-hour, closed-door Democratic Caucus meeting. “We have negotiated with terrorists,” an angry Doyle said, according to sources in the room. “This small group of terrorists have made it impossible to spend any money.” Biden, driven by his Democratic allies’ misgivings about the debt-limit deal, responded: “They have acted like terrorists,” according to several sources in the room. Biden’s office declined to comment about what the vice president said inside the closed-door session. Earlier in the day, Biden told Senate Democrats that Republican leaders have “guns to their heads” in trying to negotiate deals. Stay classy, Joe.
Read the original here:
Joe Biden: Tea partiers are ‘like terrorists’
