NBC Objects to New Romney Ad

On January 28, 2012, in Uncategorized, by BiddieDezeeuw515

At National Journal , ” NBC Asks Romney Campaign to Remove Its Content from New Ad .” Susan Duclos comments (via Memeorandum ): This type of dishonesty may be one reason that Mitt Romney’s negativity rating has surged 20 points with Independents since November. Seems ironic that Mitt Romney is going after Newt Gingrich using ethics charges that he was exonerated from by using questionable ethics of his own. Still more links at Memeorandum . Also at The Last Tradition, ” Romney camp uses Tom Brokaw in hard hitting ad about Newt Gingrich’s ethics. Brokaw doesn’t like it .”

View original post here:
NBC Objects to New Romney Ad

Three Factors to Watch Tonight

On January 3, 2012, in Uncategorized, by NatK

What to watch for tonight: 1) Turnout. There are 613,521 registered Republicans in Iowa. In 2010, 226,965 voted in the Republican primary. Last cycle’s Republican caucus turnout, with a competitive Democratic primary drawing some of the independents, was about 119,000. With a competitive primary and anti-Obama animus stirring Republicans, turnout should be higher… but will it? Keep reading this post . . .

See the original post here:
Three Factors to Watch Tonight

Well deserved. Via Gallup: 2011 Decline in Approval Steepest Among Core Independents Obama’s approval rating has decreased among all six partisan/ideology groups Gallup tracks on a regular basis since January, but it has dropped the most — 10 percentage points, from 40% to 30% — among pure independents. These are the roughly 14% of national

View original post here:
Gallup Poll: Obama’s Approval Rating Among Independent Voters Plummets To 30%…

The partisan split seen in Obama's approval rating in the latest Gallup numbers is pretty fascinating : Perhaps the more significant number is the gap between independents and Democrats. A Republican is almost always going to look at Obama

The Associated Press Has a Bad DREAM

On December 19, 2010, in Uncategorized, by kohler

**Written by Doug Powers Tom Blumer at Newsbusters passes along this Associated Press headline/story about the DREAM Act being voted down yesterday: Republicans block youth immigration bill Senate Republicans on Saturday doomed an effort that would have given hundreds of thousands of young illegal immigrants a path to legal status if they enrolled in college or joined the military Sponsors of the Dream Act fell five votes short of the 60 they needed to break through largely GOP opposition and win its enactment before Republicans take over the House and narrow Democrats’ majority in the Senate next month. “Mom! Republicans are being mean to poor, helpless kids again!” A) It wasn’t entirely a “youth” bill (one of many misrepresentations), and B) Back in the real world, with 60 votes needed to pass, the DREAM act received 55 “yes” votes. Five Democrats voted “no” (there’s your 60, AP — I know you majored in journalism and not math, but come on ) and Democrat Joe Manchin didn’t vote due to more important Christmas party obligations . To provide what would have been a safety buffer, three Republicans and two Independents votes “yes.” The Republicans weren’t in a position to block anything, up to and including bias from the Associated Press. **Written by Doug Powers Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

See original here:
The Associated Press Has a Bad DREAM

The New Comeback Kid

On December 17, 2010, in Uncategorized, by If Bush Did It

Can Obama move to the center to win back the independents?

Read the original here:
The New Comeback Kid

The Great Big Early Voting Roundup

On October 26, 2010, in barack obama, Uncategorized, by If Bush Did It

For the most part, the early voting numbers for Republicans are pretty darn good. There are some who argue that because turnout for a presidential election year is different from a midterm election year, the better comparison is to 2006. But early voting has grown more popular cycle by cycle, from about 7 percent in 1994 to about 14 percent in 2002 to almost 20 percent in 2006 to 30 percent last year. In particular, Democrats put a lot more effort into early voting in 2008 and overcame a traditional GOP advantage in this area. So it’s hard to compare early voting to results more than one cycle back. Either way, the current House of Representatives is shaped by the electorate that voted in 2008; a lot of House Democrats who were carried along by the Obama wave will not be returning in January 2011, so I think a comparison to 2008 is worthwhile. All of the figures below are from the United States Election Project at GMU as of this morning; it is important to remember we are discussing the registered party affiliation of early voters, not how they actually vote. Of course, most Republicans will vote for the GOP candidate, and most registered Democrats will vote for the Democrat. Colorado: early voting in 2008: 37.7 percent Democrat, 35.9% GOP, 26.4 percent independent. Early voting so far in 2010: 41.7% GOP, 36% Democrat, 21.6 percent independent. Some folks argued that’s disappointing for a surge. But I would note that Ken Buck and Michael Bennet are splitting the independents pretty evenly. This one will be close, but good GOP turnout is a good sign for Buck. Florida: This is the amazing one. Early voting in 2008: 45.6 percent Democrat, 37.3 percent Republican, 17.1 percent independent. Early voting in 2010: 33.7 percent Democrat, 13.5 percent independent, 52.8 percent Republican. Perhaps all of the independents and Democrats are waiting until Election Day to vote. Or perhaps the traditionally GOP-leaning Sunshine State is about to go deep red this year. Iowa: Here Democrats can celebrate the smallest drop-off. In 2008, early votes split 46.9 percent Democrat, 28.9 percent Republican, 24.2 percent other; so far this year, it is 45.5 percent Democrat, 38.1 percent Republican, 16.4 percent other. Louisiana: Another huge swing. In 2008, the state’s early vote was 58 percent registered Democrats, 28.7 Republicans, and 13.3 percent other. This year, so far, it is 45.9 percent Democrat, 43.5 percent Republican, 10.6 percent other. African-Americans were 35.6 percent of early voters in 2008; this cycle, so far, they make up 20.2 percent. (It’s worth noting that Louisiana has a lot of conservative voters who are registered Democrats.) Maine: Another big surge for the GOP. In 2008, the early vote split 41.1 percent Democrat, 27.7 percent Republicans, 31.2 percent other. So far in 2010 it is 37.1 percent Democrats, 36.9 percent Republicans, 24.2 percent independent, 1.8 percent Green. Maryland: Democrats probably don’t have to worry too much here. The state did not collect party ID on early voters in 2008, but so far this year it breaks down 63.8 percent Democrat, 27.4 percent Republican, 8.8 percent other. (Note: Maryland didn't have “early voting” per se , but it had absentee voting, which some states count as “early votes.”) Nevada: Clark and Washoe Counties break down their vote by party registration. In 2008, Clark was 52 percent Democrat, 30.6 percent Republican, 17.4 percent other; in 2010, so far, it is 46 percent Democrat, 38.2 percent Republican, 15.9 percent other. In 2008, Washoe was 47.1 percent Democrat, 35.3 percent Republican, 17.5 percent other; in 2010, so far, it is 45.9 percent Republican, 40.2 percent Democrat, 13.9 percent other. Overall, NRO contributor Elizabeth Crum sees a GOP surge . North Carolina: Barack Obama shocked the nation by winning North Carolina in 2008, and he was helped by an early vote that split 51.4 percent Democrat, 30.2 percent Republican, 18.5 percent none or other. This year, Democrats are seeing a drop-off: 44.6 percent Democrat, 38 percent Republican, 17.3 percent independent/none/other. Ohio: With no easy-to-track statewide numbers, I’ll turn things over to Jon Keeling and the Cleveland Plain-Dealer : “With a week until Election Day,

Tagged with:
 

Filed under: Democrats , Republicans , Independents , Campaigns , Matt Lewis and the News Few Americans are willing to run for political office, a new poll shows. Sadly, that means many of the best and brightest are saying no to public service.

Here is the original post:
Are the Best and Brightest Saying No to Candidacy?

From Jay Cost, at Weekly Standard , ” Obama Tries to Rally the Base “: The President’s attempts at bipartisanship typically ranged from half-hearted to specious, and his policies were never centrist. Centrists in the 111th Congress – of both parties – typically voted against the President’s agenda. Of course, if you’re on the left-hand side of the country, at, for instance, the New Republic or the American Prospect, the President did look awfully centrist. But from the perspective of middle America, he did not. Still, as wrong as this view is, I think the White House, like a lot of liberals, genuinely believes that the President tried earnestly to extend the hand of friendship, but had it bitten. The fact that it thinks it genuinely tried just goes to show that it – and, for that matter, much of the liberal intelligentsia – totally misunderstands American conservatism and the Republican party. That’s ironic because the Tea Parties have a distinctly Jeffersonian Republican flair to them, and the DNC touts Thomas Jefferson as the party’s founder. Regardless, the President is facing a situation in which the opinions of Republicans and Independents are essentially set, and have been set for a while. Republicans have been long gone, obviously. But so are Independents. Gallup has had the President’s job approval with Independents under 45% for almost four months. There is nothing the White House can do between now and the election to bring them back. Not with Recovery Summer turning into Recovery Sputter. So what is left for the White House? Rally the base . That is going to be the strategy coming from the West Wing for the next two months. That’s why the President was never going to listen to moderates in his own party about the Bush tax cuts. It’s why he is going to union meetings to talk about…sigh…more infrastructure spending. It’s why he’s talking about how his opponents treat him like a dog. Expect more stuff like this. He’ll call out Fox News and Glenn Beck. For the next two months, the message from the White House is going to be like Ponderosa for the left: all you can eat red meat. That’s all the White House has left. Their hope – faint as it is – is to cede Independents, but amp up the Democratic base so the party does not get swamped by Republicans voting 90-10 against the Democrats. My sense is that even if the White House manages to amp up its base, it is still going to lose the House. Take the basic Gallup numbers, recalibrate them for the 2006 turnout, and you still see a GOP win of +4 or thereabouts. Even with the (totally unrealistic for this year) 2008 numbers, you see a tie in the House vote, which I think would tilt the House to the GOP, thanks to the Democratic vote being concentrated in heavily Democratic districts. The White House is concerned that, if the turnout models continue the way they are, the final vote in November will be in line with Rasmussen and ABC News/WaPo, something like +13. In other words, the White House, at this point, might be happy to walk away with a 1994-style loss. The worry is something closer to 1946 or 1894, when the Democrats struggled to get 45% of the vote. ——————————————————————————–

Read this article:
Obama’s Problem Isn’t That He’s Been Too Moderate

Is the Hare Cooked?

On September 8, 2010, in Uncategorized, by If Bush Did It

The problem with this cycle is that early in the year, you pick an upset special that almost no else has noticed or is paying attention to, and then by the time Labor Day rolls around, nobody's surprised to see the challenger ahead. Over in Illinois' 17th Congressional District : Total Overall