Europe’s German Future

On February 9, 2012, in Uncategorized, by NatK

From Christopher Caldwell, at the Weekly Standard , ” Über Alles After All “: Last week Germany reclaimed its status as the leading power in Europe. In the two years since it became apparent that Greece was, essentially, bankrupt, there have been dozens of emergency meetings of the countries that use the common European currency, the euro. Most of the euro-using states believe that Germany—with a booming industrial economy, vast trade surpluses, a reputation for fiscal probity, and a history that makes it reluctant to reject the counsel of France—ought to cover the bill. Germany has long argued that Greece must become competitive again by selling off state assets and cutting government handouts. More recently, Germany has added another demand—that EU authorities be empowered to discipline Greece and other delinquent countries. At the Brussels summit on January 30, the Germans won. Germany is fortunate to have, in the moment of its triumph, a chancellor who does not scare people. Angela Merkel is an East German intellectual, a physical chemist, the childless daughter of a clergyman. She mumbles. Her taste in clothing runs to pantsuits. She isn’t brawny and forceful like her Christian Democrat mentor Helmut Kohl, who presided over the reunification of Germany at the end of the Cold War. She isn’t eloquent and haughty, or tempestuous and randy, like her Social Democratic predecessors Helmut Schmidt and Gerhard Schröder, respectively. “This lack of a presidential demeanor is a big advantage,” says longtime Bavarian governor Edmund Stoiber, whom Merkel replaced as party leader. Germany’s economy naturally provides it with a leadership role, but its history means that that role is something Germany cannot be seen to claim. “Neither personally nor politically does she come off as wanting to blow her own horn, along the lines of ‘I am the leader of Europe.’ ” By “Europe” Stoiber means the 27 countries that make up the European Union. The EU was launched in the wake of the Second World War as a way to organize Europe through economics, not war. This is a polite way of saying it was meant to keep Germany from dominating Europe with its army. A decade ago, the EU acquired a common money, the euro, which replaced the franc, the lira, the peseta, and the super-strong deutsche mark. The new monetary regime was meant to keep Germany from dominating the continent with its currency. But the euro has backfired. In 1990 British trade secretary Nicholas Ridley was forced to resign for calling the EU “a German racket designed to take over the whole of Europe.” Ridley was quite wrong about Germany’s intentions, but he was right about the result. Joining Germany in a currency union meant playing by its rules. In fact, so big and rich is Germany—particularly now that reunification has brought its population to 80 million—that joining it in anything means playing by its rules. This is not Germany’s fault. It is the classic “German problem” that has confronted Europe for the whole modern era. It was camouflaged for six decades only by Germany’s reluctance to express any wishes whatsoever. As long as Germany wasn’t complaining, others could make free with Germany’s credit card. Once in the euro, Greece, Italy, Spain, and other countries that bankers used to consider reckless or unstable could borrow at the same rates. (The treaties that bound all these dissimilar countries together stipulated that there would be no bailouts for those who borrowed too much, but bankers obviously didn’t believe that.) A boom in lending pushed up wages and prices in those “peripheral” countries, rendering them uncompetitive. After the financial crisis of 2008, the countries that had overborrowed were saddled with more debt than they could comfortably repay. The eurozone’s Mediterranean members have come to think that Germany ought to rescue them. But the Germany to which they are addressing their petitions is not the penitent, diffident, and easily browbeaten land that they came to know over the last three generations. Germany has its own ideas about economics and morality, and it is ready to insist that its weaker neighbors adhere to them. That’s a great piece — pretty accurate all around. Continue reading at the link .

Follow this link:
Europe’s German Future

Drone Strike Video

On February 9, 2012, in Afghanistan, Uncategorized, by uwwalum

Not a lot of details, but pretty wicked. Via Weasel Zippers :

Read the original post:
Drone Strike Video

Life and Death in Homs

On February 9, 2012, in Uncategorized, by JuanGetalty

Video c/o Telegraph UK. And see: ” The Agony of Homs .” More at LAT , ” Syria violence: Who is helping the wounded? ” And NYT , ” As Russia Seeks Talks, Syria Is Said to Pound City .”

See the article here:
Life and Death in Homs

The Arab Spring One Year Later

On February 3, 2012, in Uncategorized, by petreewild969

I miss Glenn Beck on Fox News. He’s a good man and great to see him at the clip here: RELATED : A great piece from Melanie Phillips, ” Why does the ailing west aid its Islamist enemies? ”

Read more:
The Arab Spring One Year Later

Scores Killed in Riots After Egypt Soccer Match

On February 2, 2012, in Uncategorized, by Richard Riker

At CNN, ” Egyptian health ministry: 74 dead, hundreds injured in soccer riots ,” and Los Angeles Times, ” Egypt soccer match brawl leaves at least 73 dead .”

See the article here:
Scores Killed in Riots After Egypt Soccer Match

Via Weasel Zippers : And from yesterday, ” The Taliban Go Mainstream: Afghanistan Terror-Sponsors Seek ‘Softer Side’ to Medieval Political Regime .”

More here:
Hellfire Missile Takes Out Taliban Jihadist

Well, you gotta give it to the Obama administration. They got Bin Laden so now it’s time to go easy on the Taliban, the medieval Islamist terror-sponsor who executes teenage girls for escaping arranged marriages and who is now looking to build deeper alliances with Pakistani militants to fight U.S. forces. But hey, it’s a new day. Barack Obama’s on the way! At Wall Street Journal , ” Emboldened Taliban Try to Sell Softer Image “: KABUL — When the Taliban ruled Afghanistan in the 1990s, Maulvi Qalamuddin headed the Committee to Protect Virtue and Prevent Vice, the religious police that shut down girls’ schools, beat up men with insufficiently long beards and arrested those in possession of music or video tapes. Nowadays, the 60-year-old Taliban cleric is on a different mission: He is overseeing a network of schools that teach reading, writing and math to thousands of girls in his home province of Logar, an insurgent hotbed just south of Kabul. “Education for women is just as necessary as education for men,” Mr. Qalamuddin thunders. “In Islam, men and women have the same duty to pray, to fast—and to seek learning.” The Taliban’s restrictions on women and schooling, combined with support for al Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden, turned the group into an international pariah even before the September 2001 attacks on America. Now, as the U.S. pulls out its troops and tries to negotiate a peace settlement with the insurgents, the international community grapples with a crucial question: If returned to power, will the Taliban behave any more responsibly this time around? In recent public statements, the Taliban have made an effort to appear a more moderate force, promising peaceful relations with neighboring countries and respect for human rights. The big unknown is whether this new rhetoric represents a meaningful transformation—or is merely designed to sugarcoat the Taliban’s real aims. “One might believe that they would change over time,” says U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Curtis Scaparrotti, the day-to-day commander of the U.S.-led coalition forces in Afghanistan. “You see some messages that they might open their thinking a bit about women, a woman’s place in society. But I don’t know that I would bet on it.” U.S. and Taliban representatives have met over the past several months, trying to establish a dialogue that could end America’s longest foreign war. In a tangible sign of progress in early January, the Taliban dropped their insistence that all foreign troops must leave Afghanistan before any peace talks begin and agreed to set up a representative office in Qatar to facilitate future negotiations. To create trust in these talks, the U.S. is considering transferring to Qatari custody five senior Taliban officials incarcerated at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Despite a new willingness to negotiate with the U.S., however, the Taliban’s leadership still believes it can reach its war aim of seizing Kabul and the rest of Afghanistan after most foreign forces withdraw in 2014, American military commanders agree. Continue reading . For some reason optimism eludes me here. But the drumbeat for precipitous withdrawal continues on the left, and even some on the mainstream right think we should pull out — because the Obama administration’s prosecution of the war has endangered American lives. Another reason to vote Republican in the fall, no matter who wins the nomination. We need to repair American foreign policy and commit to completing the gains in international security that the Bush administration had secured before the Corrupt-o-crats took office. Sheesh.

The rest is here:
The Taliban Go Mainstream: Afghanistan Terror-Sponsors Seek ‘Softer Side’ to Medieval Political Regime

IDF Weapons Instructors

On January 26, 2012, in Uncategorized, by petreewild969

Via Theo Spark :

View post:
IDF Weapons Instructors

Tagged with:
 

Who Owns Big Oil?

On January 26, 2012, in Uncategorized, by VecchiarelliKearny599

I’m seeing this ad campaign pretty often, so I checked it out. Here’s the homepage, Vote 4 Energy .

Visit link:
Who Owns Big Oil?