**Written by Doug Powers In an ad set to air during Sunday’s Super Bowl, aliens from outer space want to make sure their tax money didn’t get dumped into the Chevy Volt pit — at least that’s my take on it : Ahead of the big game, Chevrolet has released its upcoming Super Bowl advertisement for the plug-in hybrid on the internet, in which a man in a bathrobe goes out to his garage in the middle of the night and discovers a group of little cone-headed green and purple creatures inspecting a Volt. Exasperated by what seems to be a recurring event, he tells them, “I’ll say it again, it’s electric, but when I need to go farther it uses gas. Please tell me you understand.” Here’s the ad: ***** There were 603 Volts sold in January, so encouraging sales numbers like that certainly justify shelling out the big bucks for some out-of-this-world ad time to attempt a product re-launch during the Super Bowl. It’s not as expensive an ad purchase as it might sound. If the average Super Bowl spot this year is going for $3.5 million, then, according to some estimates, the commercial time was purchased at the total cost of just 14 Volts . The spot would be more effective on a “high tech” level if the ET’s would have ditched their spacecraft in the guy’s driveway and taken the car instead, but even fiction has its limits when it comes to suspension of disbelief. **Written by Doug Powers Twitter @ThePowersThatBe
Read the original post:
Super Bowl Ad: ET’s Visit Earth to Make Sure Their Tax Dollars Didn’t Fund the Volt
On his radio show today, Rush Limbaugh mentioned an email he got about a Club for Growth report that Newt supported the “Fairness Doctrine” back in 1987. If that’s going to be thrown out there, let’s at least find out what the claim is and if Newt has a response. Here’s the relevant text from the Club for Growth “presidential white paper” on Newt Gingrich : POLITICAL FREE SPEECH Maximizing prosperity requires sound government policies. When government strays from these policies, citizens must be free to exercise their constitutional rights to petition and criticize those policies and the politicians responsible for them. Except for one large blemish, Gingrich has what seems to be a clear, strong, and positive stand on behalf of political free speech. In 1995, he countered calls for spending restrictions in campaigns by noting the 1992 presidential campaigns combined spent half of the major television networks’ news budgets. He said giving journalists free, unlimited access to the public while restricting campaign contributions represented “a nonsensical socialist analysis based on hatred of the free enterprise system.” Gingrich has rightly been a harsh critic of the McCain-Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act, saying in 2006 that it ought to have been named the “McCain-Feingold censorship law” and compared it to the Sedition Act of 1798. According to Gingrich, “A truly functioning campaign system would take power out of Washington and return it to its owners—the American people. Such a system would allow individuals to make unlimited contributions to candidates for Congress in their district, so long as it is reported immediately on the Internet and is transparent and accessible.” Gingrich strongly supported Citizens United in their challenge against the constitutionality of the McCain Feingold bill, and recently appeared in a video produced by Citizen United commemorating the anniversary of the successful ruling. Nevertheless, Gingrich supported the “Fairness Doctrine” in 1987, a proposal that would force broadcasters to air all sides of a controversial issue. It obviously infringes 1st Amendment rights and it can only lead to bigger government as bureaucrats haggle over what’s controversial, what’s “fair”, and other details. Here’s the Newt campaign’s response to the charge from their website: Newt does not support the Fairness Doctrine and he has been vocally critical of the left’s efforts to reinstate the doctrine over the past decade, including supporting Mike Pence’s bill that prohibited government censorship in radio in 2007. In 1987, the three left-wing networks plus PBS/NPR dominated media, and talk-radio was still nascent; many of America’s most influential conservative activists, including the American Conservative Union and Phyllis Schlafly, supported the Fairness Doctrine at this time. The rapid growth of conservative viewpoints in the media in the last 25 years is a testament to the power and innovation of the conservative movement once power is taken out of the hands of the elite networks and put into the hands of consumers.
See the original post:
Controversy over Newt’s support of Fairness Doctrine in 1987
We read: “Google has removed hundreds of web pages relating to former motorsport boss Max Mosley’s sex life from its search results index, Britain’s Leveson Inquiry on press standards has heard. But the internet giant said it dealt with requests for material to be excluded on a country-by-country basis, meaning articles and videos might remain accessible on
See original here:
Mosley v Google censorship battle
Smoke rises from police headquarters in Kano, Nigeria following a wave of coordinated attacks by the radical Muslim sect known as Boko Haram that left at least 143 dead. (Reuters)
A victim of Friday's bomb blast and gun attacks lies in Murtala Muhammad specialist hospital in Kano, Nigeria Saturday, Jan. 21, 2012. (AP Photo/Salisu Rabiu)

Follow this link:
Radical Islamic Attacks Kill at Least 143 in Nigeria
In a bit of serendipity, the day after the big Internet protest against SOPA and PIPA the FBI acts on the powers already granted under the law to shut down a massive file sharing site (NY Times) In what the federal authorities on Thursday called one of the largest criminal copyright cases ever brought, the
Visit link:
FBI Shuts Down File Sharing Site Megaupload – We Need SOPA And PIPA Why?
No, Glenn Beck isn’t Daniel Boone but like Boone, he’s showing the world things it’s never seen before in media and beyond. Marcus Carey , editor of BlueGrassBulletin.com, says it best: [Daniel Boone] was a visionary who saw the potential of the rich environment which was at the time unexplored, uncharted and yet filled with bounty, if only he could bring people with him to put down roots in a strange and uncertain place. We now exalt Daniel Boone for his courage, his vision and his stamina. We credit him with much of the settlement of America west of the Alleghenies. A few months back I wrote about Glenn Beck’s move from Fox News to his new online venture at GBTV. I reminded folks how UHF channels offered the first competition to the three big broadcast networks, then how cable TV opened up a new frontier for expanded programming, only to be vastly improved upon by satellite television offerings. I opined that Glenn Beck’s vision to take his show to the Internet was groundbreaking, filled with potential and could change everything. At first when I logged in to watch his show I was less than impressed. Sure, he had a nice studio, good lighting, expensive cameras and his “live streaming” technology seemed to be cutting edge. But the show wasn’t comfortable to watch on my computer screen, nor was his content up to his old standards at Fox. But then Glenn moved his family and his operation to Texas and this week he is launching his “dream” from an amazing studio in Dallas called “The Planning Office.” I just finished watching his entire two hour program and had to share my experience with the world. In short it was “WOW!” Read more of Carey’s personal experience with GBTV here .

Read more:
Glenn Beck is Daniel Boone?
The co-founder of Wikipedia Jimmy Wales is giving students fair warning: they should do their homework before Wednesday when the site will go dark, along with other sites, in protest of anti-piracy legislation under consideration in Congress.
Facebook post by Jimmy Wales, co-founder of Wikipedia.
Jimmy Wales announced that Wikipedia would blackout for 24 hours in SOPA protest on Wednesday.
Reuters – Media baron Rupert Murdoch used his new Twitter account this weekend to attack the Obama administration’s opposition to parts of proposed legislation designed to combat Internet piracy.
Original post:
Rupert Murdoch turns to Twitter to attack Obama
(Reuters)
