See Diary of Daedalus, ” Chuck continues to play victim .” And The Other McCain, ” Saint Charles, Martyr of LGF .” RELATED : Pamela at CPAC: ” CPAC 2012: ISLAMIC LAW IN AMERICA — GELLER, SPENCER, PANTANO, MUISE, ADAMS .”

See the article here:
Charles Johnson Whines After Getting Smacked Down for Attacks on Pamela Geller

Tagged with:
 

AP – The Afghan Taliban on Saturday denied that their leader Mullah Omar had written to President Barack Obama last July.

Read the rest here:
Taliban deny their leader sent letter to Obama
(AP)

Canadian Confusion Over Honor Killings

On February 3, 2012, in Uncategorized, by BennyCarlob

From Jerry Philipson, at American Thinker (via Blazing Cat Fur ).

See the original post:
Canadian Confusion Over Honor Killings

Denver Broncos quarterback Tim Tebow has captured headlines for months over the phenomenon known as “Tebowing” and a strong allegiance to his Christian beliefs. Now, the famous football player may be the focus of controversy in the faith community after backing out of ” Contending for the Faith Weekend ,” a Christian revival event he reportedly committed to speak at.

A great clip, via Atlas Shrugs, ” Religious Slaughter: Michael Coren on FOX TV Discussing Honor Killings .”

Go here to read the rest:
Megyn Kelly Interviews Michael Coren on Canada Honor Killing Verdicts

From Phyllis Chesler, at Fox News, ” Will Guilty Verdict in Canadian ‘Honor Killing’ Trial Be a Turning Point for Justice? “: Western-style domestic violence and even domestically violent femicide is not the same as an honor killing. For example, Westerners rarely kill their young daughters nor do Western families of origin conspire or collaborate in such murders. While Sikhs, and Hindus, (mainly in India), do commit honor killings, the majority of such murders in the West (91%) are Muslim-on-Muslim crimes. The high-profile Shafia case may be a watershed decision in terms of Canada’s long standing Multiculturalism Policy which was passed in 1971 under Prime Minister Trudeau and legally enshrined in 1988 as the Canadian Multiculturalism Act. According to Dr. Salim Mansur, a Muslim Canadian professor and author, such policies are ultimately “racist.” They keep immigrants confined to their “group” and do not encourage members to become “individuals” and “citizens” of a modern liberal democracy. Although some have called for a special “honor killing” law, it is important to note that the Shafias were tried and convicted under existing Canadian law. They were not tried for committing a culturally approved “honor killing,” but for having conspired to commit a cold-blooded and pre-planned murder on Canadian soil. So, too, were Muslim-Canadian Aqsa Parvez’s father, Mohammed, and her brother, Waqas, who were tried and convicted for murdering the 16-year-old girl because she refused to wear the hijab and other traditional clothing. Her mother, who was not tried, lured her daughter home from a shelter for battered women to her death. After the Shafia jury was individually polled, (it was a unanimous decision and the evidence of guilt was overwhelming), the Justice, Robert Maranger said “It is hard to imagine a more heinous crime, a cold-blooded and shameful crime, (committed because of) a sick notion about honor that has no place in this society.” And in a statement following the verdict, Canadian Justice Minister Rob Nicholson called honor killings a practice that is “barbaric and unacceptable in Canada….This government is committed to protecting women and other vulnerable persons from all forms of violence and to hold perpetrators accountable for their acts.” Defense lawyer David Crowe has vowed to appeal. The accused continue to insist they are innocent. I hope that Canadian and North American Muslim associations and experts will welcome this decision in which three murdered Muslim girls and one murdered Muslim woman were considered important enough to merit a long and expensive trial in the search for justice. VIDEO HAT TIP : Blazing Cat Fur, ” Ezra Levant Rips Political Correctness & CBC”s Coverage of the Shafia Honour Killing .”

View post:
Reactions to Guilty Verdicts in Canada ‘Honor Killing’ Trial

At Wall Street Journal , ” Afghan Immigrants in Canada Found Guilty of Honor Killing “: TORONTO—A Canadian court found two Afghan immigrant parents and their eldest son guilty of murdering four female family members in a so-called honor killing Sunday, the climax of a case that’s transfixed Canada and sparked a wider debate about clashing cultures amid the country’s large immigrant population. Mohammad Shafia, his wife, Tooba Mohammad Yahya, and eldest son, Hamed, were found guilty of killing Mr. Shafia’s three teenage daughters and Mr. Shafia’s first wife in an elaborately staged, though ultimately bungled, car accident in June 2009. The defense argued the four died after a late-night joy ride went awry. The four-month trial opened a relatively rare window onto honor killings in North America. The crime, where victims are murdered for bringing shame on their family, is increasingly common in western European countries like Britain and Sweden, which has seen large-scale immigration from countries where researchers say the custom happens most—such as Pakistan, India and Turkey …. The prosecution argued it was honor rooted in Afghan tribal traditions that led Mr. Shafia to cleanse the shame he felt from the conduct of his rebellious daughters, Zainab, 19 years old, Sahar, 17, and Geeti, 13. The eldest two took unapproved boyfriends, and all three disobeyed their father through their independent behavior and sometimes-revealing dress. Rona Amir Mohammad, who was Mr. Shafia’s first spouse in the polygamous family, was killed, the prosecution argued, because she was a troublesome first wife and lenient step mother. The trial filled the Canadian press with the macabre details of a murder in which police believe the victims were drowned and then placed into a car that was then pushed into a lock outside of Kingston, near Toronto. The local press printed police transcripts of a ranting Mr. Shafia calling his daughters “whores” and boasting, “nothing is more dear to me than my honor.” Video c/o Blazing Cat Fur . And my previous roundup is here: ” Shafia Family Guilty of Honor Killings in Canada: Updates .”

Continue reading here:
Shafia Convictions Put Focus on Culture of Honor Killings

Tagged with:
 

Okay, my earlier post is here: ” Guilty Verdicts in Canada Honor Killing Trial .” And see Pamela here, ” GUILTY! First Degree Murder Verdicts in Shafia Honor Killing Trial .” And don’t miss the excellent Christie Blatchford, at National Post , ” No honour in ‘cold-blooded, shameless’ murder of Shafia girls .” Plus, London’s Daily Mail has a huge article, ” Honour killing family jailed for life as judge says: ‘It is difficult to conceive of a more despicable, more heinous crime’ .” And an update at Blazing Cat Fur, ” Shafia Murders: CBC Finds Apologist Who Implies Canada Racist & Just Like Islamist Hell Holes .” And here’s an earlier clip with Ezra Levant on the tragedy of honor killings in Canada:

Link:
Shafia Family Guilty of Honor Killings in Canada: Updates

Well, you gotta give it to the Obama administration. They got Bin Laden so now it’s time to go easy on the Taliban, the medieval Islamist terror-sponsor who executes teenage girls for escaping arranged marriages and who is now looking to build deeper alliances with Pakistani militants to fight U.S. forces. But hey, it’s a new day. Barack Obama’s on the way! At Wall Street Journal , ” Emboldened Taliban Try to Sell Softer Image “: KABUL — When the Taliban ruled Afghanistan in the 1990s, Maulvi Qalamuddin headed the Committee to Protect Virtue and Prevent Vice, the religious police that shut down girls’ schools, beat up men with insufficiently long beards and arrested those in possession of music or video tapes. Nowadays, the 60-year-old Taliban cleric is on a different mission: He is overseeing a network of schools that teach reading, writing and math to thousands of girls in his home province of Logar, an insurgent hotbed just south of Kabul. “Education for women is just as necessary as education for men,” Mr. Qalamuddin thunders. “In Islam, men and women have the same duty to pray, to fast—and to seek learning.” The Taliban’s restrictions on women and schooling, combined with support for al Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden, turned the group into an international pariah even before the September 2001 attacks on America. Now, as the U.S. pulls out its troops and tries to negotiate a peace settlement with the insurgents, the international community grapples with a crucial question: If returned to power, will the Taliban behave any more responsibly this time around? In recent public statements, the Taliban have made an effort to appear a more moderate force, promising peaceful relations with neighboring countries and respect for human rights. The big unknown is whether this new rhetoric represents a meaningful transformation—or is merely designed to sugarcoat the Taliban’s real aims. “One might believe that they would change over time,” says U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Curtis Scaparrotti, the day-to-day commander of the U.S.-led coalition forces in Afghanistan. “You see some messages that they might open their thinking a bit about women, a woman’s place in society. But I don’t know that I would bet on it.” U.S. and Taliban representatives have met over the past several months, trying to establish a dialogue that could end America’s longest foreign war. In a tangible sign of progress in early January, the Taliban dropped their insistence that all foreign troops must leave Afghanistan before any peace talks begin and agreed to set up a representative office in Qatar to facilitate future negotiations. To create trust in these talks, the U.S. is considering transferring to Qatari custody five senior Taliban officials incarcerated at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Despite a new willingness to negotiate with the U.S., however, the Taliban’s leadership still believes it can reach its war aim of seizing Kabul and the rest of Afghanistan after most foreign forces withdraw in 2014, American military commanders agree. Continue reading . For some reason optimism eludes me here. But the drumbeat for precipitous withdrawal continues on the left, and even some on the mainstream right think we should pull out — because the Obama administration’s prosecution of the war has endangered American lives. Another reason to vote Republican in the fall, no matter who wins the nomination. We need to repair American foreign policy and commit to completing the gains in international security that the Bush administration had secured before the Corrupt-o-crats took office. Sheesh.

The rest is here:
The Taliban Go Mainstream: Afghanistan Terror-Sponsors Seek ‘Softer Side’ to Medieval Political Regime