MAYFIELD, Ky. (The Blaze/AP) — A group of Amish men were sent to jail in western Kentucky Thursday for refusing to pay fines for breaking a state highway law that requires their horse-drawn buggies to be marked with orange reflective triangles. This is not the first time this has happened, however. The men have a religious objection to the bright orange signs, which they say are flashy and conflict with their pledge to live low-key and religious lives. Ananias Byler, the first of 10 Amish men who appeared in Graves County District Court on Thursday, was sentenced to 10 days in jail. The men were jailed for being found in contempt of court for refusing to pay fines. Byler told Judge Deborah Crooks Thursday that he would not pay the $489 he owes. “I totally understand your objection,” the judge told Byler. “But you’re in violation, and it’s not up to me to change the law. It doesn’t really matter what I think about any of this.” The men belong to a conservative breakaway group of Amish known as Swartzentruber. They live simply, with no electricity, plumbing or appliances. But in recent years they have been running afoul of the law here for refusing to use the triangles on their buggies, and some were sent to jail last year. The Amish men, wearing long dark coats on a snowy day in Mayfield, removed their black wide-brimmed hats before entering the courtroom. They sat quietly until their names were called. Jacob Gingerich said he and the other men will continue to refuse to pay the fines. Gingerich owed more than $600 and was sentenced to 13 days in jail Thursday. “We’re just not going to pay,” Gingerich, a farmer with 12 children, said before the court appearance. Their sentences ranged from three to 13 days for fines ranging from $153 to $627. Serving the jail time will clear their fines off the books, at a rate of about $50 a day. County Jailer Randy Haley said the men were staying together Thursday in a large holding cell. They will wear special dyed jail uniforms because they object to the orange jumpsuits, he said. The men also asked that they not be submitted to mug shots, and Haley said he agreed. The issue over the orange triangles has come up before in other states with Amish populations. Ohio, New York and Pennsylvania have allowed exemptions for the Swartzentrubers, and courts in Wisconsin, Minnesota and Michigan have sided with them. But police and prosecutors in Kentucky say the orange triangles are the law because they help motorists see the buggies and avoid collisions. “You get behind one of the buggies at night, you can’t see it,” Graves County Sheriff DeWayne Redmon said. “We’re citing them for their own safety as well as the safety of others.” Gingerich and two other Amish men, with help from the Kentucky chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union, have sued over the state highway law, saying it infringes on their religious freedom. The Kentucky Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case later this year after the state appeals court rejected the Amish men’s argument in June. Gingerich said Thursday that he wished the judge would have waited for the state Supreme Court to hear the case before throwing the men in jail. Kentucky lawmakers are considering changes to the highway law to allow the Amish to use gray reflective tape instead of the orange triangles. Of Kentucky’s 120 counties, Graves County has recorded the most violations for failure to use the orange triangles in the last five years, according to data obtained by The Associated Press. The county has recorded 57 of a total of 89 violations statewide since 2007.

Read the rest here:
Amish Men Jailed for Refusing to Mark Horse-Drawn Buggies with Orange Reflective Signs

Tagged with:
 

Free speech on a plate?

On December 10, 2011, in Uncategorized, by BennyCarlob

As usual, the ACLU is an opponent of free speech “The ACLU has managed to block North Carolina from issuing license plates with a “Choose Life” message because the state legislature declined to also issue “Choose Death” plates. U.S. District Judge James Fox didn’t put it that way in his Nov. 28 injunction, but he did agree

Read more:
Free speech on a plate?

Reason interviews Judge Napolitano

On November 24, 2011, in Uncategorized, by

We interviewed Fox Business Channel’s Judge Andrew Napolitano in October about his book “It’s Dangerous to be Right when the Government is Wrong.” Napolitano told us our current federal government does “not have respect for natural law, American law, or even the laws that they are writing.” He spoke more about his book with “Reason” magazine recently:

View post:
Reason interviews Judge Napolitano

Judge Andrew Napolitano (Photo: Fox News Channel)

In his sixth book Judge Andrew Napolitano builds upon a common theme in his work; arguing that our rights come from our humanity and natural law, and that the government does not have the right to pick and choose our individual freedoms. “Personal liberties are integral to our humanity,” said Judge Napolitano in a phone interview with The Blaze Thursday. “Government thinks it can decide our freedoms, this is wrong.” In the Fox Business host and Fox News judicial analyst’s new book; It Is Dangerous To Be Right When the Government Is Wrong: The Case for Personal Freedom , Judge Napolitano “documents the decline of personal freedom, warns of government tyranny, and fights for the natural rights of every American,” as described in a press release for the book has hit stores this week. Rather than writing the book through the eyes of a journalist, the Judge builds upon his career in law to present a philosophical argument. Judge Napolitano tells The Blaze that the basic theme of the book is centered on American values, and argues that “we need to remind the people we send to DC, that they cannot take our rights and liberties.” Building upon the writings of St. Augustine, Thomas Aquinas to Thomas Jefferson, Judge Napolitano says the book reviews the religious and philosophical principles that underscore the concept of human freedom as the founders understood it. The book goes through moments of history where natural law was challenged, including the arguments of Thomas Moore, to 17th century British Parliament debates if the King was bigger than the rule of law, to the beginning of the book where Judge Napolitano writes of Nikita Khrushchev’s failed agricultural policy. Inspired by the Iowa-style corn-belt, Khrushchev advocated an extensive ” Maize Campaign .” Khrushchev ordered the widespread planting of corn in frozen Siberia. The ambitious initiative was a disastrous failure. A part-time farmer himself, Judge Napolitano tells The Blaze that he decided to begin the book with this narrative, for the failed policy is a perfect example that “there is a natural law that is a restraint on what government can do.” Judge Napolitano references history to argue that our natural rights and liberties are still threatened by our government today. “This President and government do not have respect for natural law, American law, or even the laws that they are writing,” said Judge Napolitano to The Blaze. Beyond Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Privacy, the Judge points to Freedom of Contract which is at times overlooked, and “severely under assault.” The new book is a call to American citizens to be vigilant in the face of coercive government, and Judge Napolitano makes the case for personal freedom and an individual’s right to disobey such an unjust government. Over the phone Thursday, the Judge pointed to the civil disobedience that brought an end to the unjust Jim Crow Laws as an example of the right to disobey, conquering government’s assault on personal freedom. Given this assertion, when asked of the protest and civil disobedience on display in Zuccotti Park and in the ‘Occupy Wall Street’ movement, Judge Napolitano says that some in these groups have a legitimate complaint, but as a whole have the wrong focus. “Their futures are at risk because of government action effecting capitalism,” says Judge Napolitano. “Not capitalism itself.” As the Occupy Wall Street movement has the wrong focus, Judge Napolitano tells The Blaze that he fears the Tea Party could be losing it’s narrative. While the Tea Party’s presence in the 2010 midterm elections may have led to victories for the cause of liberty, Judge Napolitano tells The Blaze that he fears the movement has been co-opted. “It’s a lukewarm version of itself,” says the Judge. “Pseudo Tea Partiers have infected the movement.” Where Judge Napolitano’s loyalties lie in the 2012 Presidential Election become evident pretty early on in the book. In fact even before the first chapter. It Is Dangerous To Be Right When the Government Is Wrong: The Case for Personal Freedom is dedicated to Texas Rep. Ron Paul. Judge Napolitano hosts “FreedomWatch” on Fox Business, and was the fill-in host and a frequent guest on Glenn Beck’s Fox News Channel show, “The Glenn Beck Program.” Prior to joining Fox in 1998, Judge Napolitano was the youngest life-tenured Superior Court judge in the history of the State of New Jersey, and while on the bench from 1987 to 1995, tried more than 150 jury trials, and sat in all parts of the Superior Court–Criminal, Civil, Equity, and Family.

Continue reading here:
Blaze Interview: Judge Napolitano Argues Case of Personal Freedom Against Intrusive Government in Sixth Book

Tagged with:
 

Before the Bowie County Commissioner’s Court in Texas begins its official business, it recites the Pledge of Allegiance, and a prayer. But a county judge wants to be sure the written record contains no mention of those pledges or prayers, and has ordered the local clerk not to record them. She refuses to go along and cover up what she believes is right. And now could face the consequences. Last week , Natalie Nichols, a County Clerk in Bowie, stood up to a judge and refused to erase the pledge and prayer from the official minutes of the county commissioner’s meeting. For standing on principle, she could end up paying a fine, or even go to jail. Ms. Nichols alleges that Judge Sterling Lacy physically crossed through and x-ed out the pledge and prayer in the official record of the minutes, and then lied about doing it. Apparently, the judge was afraid of possible lawsuits, and wanted all the participants in the meeting to pretend that no prayer or pledge was recited. Fox News reports on what Judge Lacy allegedly said: “…Purposely do not place items such as the pledge and/or invocation on the Agenda, and purposely perform them prior to to calling the meeting to order for fear of being sued by an organization such as the ACLU and do not want to give the impression that it is the court’s official stance.” Nichols refused to do this, and now Judge Lacy has lodged a complaint with the County Sheriff, stating that Ms. Nichols disrupted the proceedings of the Commissioner’s meeting. The Sheriff’s Office states it will investigate the matter and present its findings to the Distict Attorney’s Office. The DA will then decide whether to put Ms Nichols before a grand jury. Nichols, however, does not seem the least bit deterred by the prospect of criminal charges. “If I need to go to jail for standing up this country and for God, I will do so,” she told Fox News in an interview Monday morning. “A lot of people bled and died for this country, I’m risking a little bit of jail time. I’m okay with that.” Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.com

Read this article:
Texas Court Clerk Could Face Jail Time After Standing Up for Pledge, Prayer

Tagged with:
 

Senator Rand Paul (R.-Ky.) and Fox News personality Judge Andrew Napolitano to attend this year’s FreedomFest.

Read more from the original source:
Are We Headed For Another French Revolution?

Tagged with:
 

Americans needn’t feel “powerless,” the presidential hopeful says, and the judge who threatened jail time if high school students used religious language at their graduation must be removed.

Link:
Gingrich Calls for Congress to Fire Texas ‘Speech Police’ Judge

Judge’s Prop 8 Ruling Contested

On April 26, 2011, in Uncategorized, by uwwalum

Supporters of California’s Proposition 8, which bans gay marriage, filed a motion seeking to reinstate the law because the judge who overturned the ban recently disclosed he is gay and in a relationship.

Read more:
Judge’s Prop 8 Ruling Contested

Recommendation: Dropbox

On April 18, 2011, in barack obama, Uncategorized, by Barry Munz

I thought I would write up a post that shares my good experiences with a service called Dropbox. Dropbox is a form of “cloud storage” in which you can store and transfer files from one computer to another without moving them to a thumb drive or external hard drive. You can hook up numerous computers and even mobile devices (like an iPhone, iPad, Android, etc.) to the Dropbox and access files in that manner. When you change a file on one computer, it will automatically be changed on any other computer that you choose to link to the Dropbox. One benefit: you never have to use a thumb drive again. For example, when we were recently out of state, my brother-in-law did a slideshow for a funeral, and my wife wanted to transfer the photos of her grandmother to our home computer. There was no thumb drive transfer. We simply logged into my account at the Dropbox site, and uploaded the file to my Dropbox account. Not only did it automatically sync to our home computers, but I was instantly able to view the photos on my iPad, simply by accessing the Dropbox app on the iPad. My wife came home and found the photos she wanted on our home computer, and uploaded a couple of them to her Facebook page. Easy. Once you start using it, you’ll discover more and more uses, and (like me) you may get roped into shelling out the $99/year for the 50 GB of storage. The combination of greater storage space, together with the app functionality, dramatically expands the functional storage capacity of your mobile device. For example, if you have 50 GB of information in the Dropbox, you can access any of that information on your 16GB iPhone without cluttering up the iPhone’s storage. To take another concrete example: like many lawyers, I collect case citations that are useful to my practice. Many people print out cases, or make card catalogs of relevant citations. I have tended to keep those citations in a folder on my computer. But with the Dropbox, I can access them from my phone. Having those handy in court is obviously a useful thing. When the judge says: “You can’t ask that question, Mr. Frey! That’s hearsay!” it is obviously a great benefit to be able to give the judge a case citation without making a sojourn back to the office. I haven’t had occasion to test it yet, but apparently you can recover previous versions of word processing documents. If you accidentally deleted hours of work, but your file was in the Dropbox, you should be able to recover the previous version (but check their site for the details). I can’t say that I have priced out every data storage plan out there, but here is what I like about Dropbox. With some cloud storage services, you’re limited to one computer. Carbonite, for example, backs up portions of one hard drive for $55/year. But you can’t add files from a second computer without paying another $55. With Dropbox, there is one “box” and you can put files into it from any computer. Dropbox is no substitute for a full backup of your computer’s hard drive with an external hard drive, which is cheaper than cloud storage for multiple computers and has far greater capacity (2 TB for around $125 in many cases). But I find new uses for it every day. The coolest part is that they give you 2 GB for free — with no obligation to buy. Like I say, if you like it as much as I did, you may get roped into buying more, but if you don’t, just use the 2 GB. Here is an even cooler deal: if you sign up for Dropbox using this link , and download their desktop app (which is the easiest way to use it), you will get an extra 250MB — for a total of 2.25 GB free. (I will get 500 MB of extra space for every person referred in this way.) As I understand it, the extra space is available even if you never pay them a cent, as long as you use the desktop app. When you click the link, you can watch a quick video tour that I wish I could embed here. You can set up a free account with nothing more than a first and last name, an e-mail address, and a password. So try it and let me know what you think.

Read the original post:
Recommendation: Dropbox

Tagged with:
 

CA Judge who struck down Prop 8 confirms he’s gay

View post:
CA Judge who struck down Prop 8 confirms he’s gay

Tagged with: