House Republicans took power promising a new era of openness in Congress. One year after their landmark victory, the realities of governance are sometimes at odds with that goal.
View post:
GOP’s Vow of Openness in Spotlight
Big cigarette makers could recoup $2 billion under a proposed deal with state attorneys general to resolve a long-running dispute over payments required by the landmark 1998 tobacco settlement.

Go here to see the original:
States Near Tobacco Deal
I’m hoping to head up to the Landmark tonight, in West Los Angeles, to catch “Miral,” the new pro-Palestinian film from director Julian Schnabel. I’m skeptical of the review at the Los Angeles Times , which quotes Schnabel in defense of his movie: Using the touch-points of 1967′s Six Day War and 1987′s intifada, when teenage Miral is galvanized into action by the sight of Israeli bulldozers razing Palestinian homes, Schnabel paints a convincing picture of displacement and life under occupation. Without undue emphasis, he and cinematographer Eric Gautier use the parched landscape — they filmed in Jerusalem — and its checkpoints to eloquent effect. The film works best in its depictions of everyday negotiations, as when Miral’s cousin begins dating a Jew (played by the director’s daughter, Stella Schnabel). “Miral” doesn’t aim to present every point of view, only that of its characters. There’s nothing “anti-Israel,” as some have claimed, about its earnest, if simplistic call for compassion and peace. One of the strongest scenes involves a would-be act of terrorism by a Palestinian and unequivocally identifies with the intended victims. And Miral’s journey leads her back to her gentle father (Alexander Siddig) and to Mama Hind, voices of patience, moderation and love. Right. Moderation and love. I doubt it, but I’ll have more after I see the film. Schnabel’s full interview is at Boston Globe , ” Schnabel describes ‘Miral’ using fine brush strokes .” Meanwhile, from Solomonia, ” An Open Letter to Harvey Weinstein “: On the same day that a family of five were being murdered in their home in Israel, Harvey Weinstein ran a self-congratulatory promotional piece for his company’s terrorist propaganda flick, Miral. The photos stand out. The fat smirking face of Harvey Weinstein contrasted with the sleeping baby, the smiling little boys and the earnest couple who were their parents. They are all dead, and a Harvey Weinstein lives on to smirk another day. So it is with perpetrators and victims. The innocent children and the fat ugly men who profit from trafficking in the narrative of their killers. Harvey Weinstein denounces Peter King and urges him to go watch Miral. But perhaps it is Harvey Weinstein who should drive to a small town lost in the Samarian Mountains and retrace the steps of the murderers in the name of the nationalistic mythology that movies like Miral glamorize. To fit himself through the living room window where the two terrorists entered, moving quietly in the dark, not seeing the six year old boy sleeping peacefully on the couch. That six year old boy who survived because like so many other little boys during the Holocaust, the men who were coming to murder him went right past him without seeing him. The six year old boy who was being orphaned around the same time that Harvey Weinstein and his PR people were conferring on a final draft for their Miral puff piece. More at the link above, and also, ” Elder of Ziyon: Miral, the Posters .” More on this later …

The rest is here:
The Controversy Over ‘Miral’
AP – Republicans reluctant to quickly ratify a nuclear weapons deal with Russia said Tuesday the Obama administration had addressed some of their concerns, raising the prospect for Senate approval of the landmark treaty.

Go here to read the rest:
GOP senators signal progress on nuclear treaty
(AP)
Reuters – The Obama administration may have to wait several months to begin enforcing parts of the landmark Dodd-Frank financial reform law because Congress has delayed funds necessary for its implementation.
Follow this link:
Congress funding fight may delay Wall Street reforms
(Reuters)
The judge who decided the Proposition 8 case in California yesterday is gay : The biggest open secret in the landmark trial over same-sex marriage being heard in San Francisco is that the federal judge who will decide the case, Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker , is himself gay. It’s funny I didn’t hear of this until today. Of course, I haven’t really kept up with the issue, I had little doubt it would be ruled unconstitutional. His reasoning seemed really horrible, too, from the little bits and pieces I heard yesterday. I’ll try to read his decision and post my thoughts on it if I get a chance. Filed under: Politics

See the rest here:
And the winner is…

