What Happened to All the Milblogs?

On February 11, 2012, in Afghanistan, Iraq, Uncategorized, by ThresaFralin

An interesting discussion at Thunder Run , ” Where Have the MilBlogs Gone? “, and ” Where Have All the MilBlogs Gone – Part 2 .” Follow the links at Part 2 for some of the responses.

See the original post here:
What Happened to All the Milblogs?

Military Intervention in Syria

On February 10, 2012, in barack obama, Iraq, Uncategorized, by TwilaManozca764

From Michael Weiss, at The New Republic , ” Break the Stalemate! A Blueprint For a Military Intervention in Syria “: In the past several weeks, the Free Syrian Army (FSA) and other independent rebel brigades have made great strides: They have “liberated” key cities such as Zabadani, 20 miles outside of Damascus; set up checkpoints in restive areas throughout the country; and even begun to seize a few tanks and armored vehicles. For a network of ragtag militias, armed mainly with AK-47s and RPGs that defecting soldiers have given or sold them, the rebels have impressively taken the fight right up to Bashar al-Assad’s doorstep. But the rebels can only go so far. “If no one helps us, we can hit the regime painfully but we can’t topple it, not [when it has] jets and tanks,” Alaa al-Sheikh, the spokesman for the Khaled Bin Waleed Brigade in Rastan, told me. This is a fair precis of the current situation in the nearly year-long Syrian uprising, in which the Assad regime has killed 7,000 people and dispossessed and imprisoned tens of thousands more. The rebels are waging a guerrilla war of attrition designed to exhaust Assad’s army and security forces rather than defeat them: They hope that if and when external help comes, they can make quick work of whatever regime elements remain. In that way, it would be a mistake to describe the crisis in Syria simply as a humanitarian catastrophe. It is also a military stalemate—one that the West can decisively break in favor of anti-Assad forces by offering them military assistance. Going to war is a dangerous and risky business, and critics of Western intervention in Syria have understandably focused on three main hazards: the proliferation of jihadist groups, regional destabilization, and the rise of sectarianism (particularly between the Sunni majority and the Christian and Alawite minorities). But the worst fears of what might happen following an intervention have already come to pass and only threaten to grow worse with continued inaction. Continue reading . And here’s Weiss’ blueprint for intervention, ” Intervention in Syria? An Assessment of Legality, Logistics and Hazards .” The Los Angeles Times has an editorial out today opposing intervention, ” Avoiding the Syria Trap .” Check the arguments there. It’s obvious that “diplomacy” won’t work. And if the U.S. did intervene it would be against the wishes of Russia and China, and the West could risk a new Islamist regime coming to power in Damascus. But in the absence of regime change, it’s likely that Assad will continue to massacre his own people. There are no good options here.

Excerpt from:
Military Intervention in Syria

Drone Strike Video

On February 9, 2012, in Afghanistan, Uncategorized, by uwwalum

Not a lot of details, but pretty wicked. Via Weasel Zippers :

Read the original post:
Drone Strike Video

Life and Death in Homs

On February 9, 2012, in Uncategorized, by JuanGetalty

Video c/o Telegraph UK. And see: ” The Agony of Homs .” More at LAT , ” Syria violence: Who is helping the wounded? ” And NYT , ” As Russia Seeks Talks, Syria Is Said to Pound City .”

See the article here:
Life and Death in Homs

Israel’s Case for War With Iran

On February 8, 2012, in Uncategorized, by starsh1p

From Niall Ferguson, at Newsweek , ” Israel and Iran on the Eve of Destruction in a New Six-Day War .” The single biggest danger in the Middle East today is not the risk of a six-day Israeli war against Iran. It is the risk that Western wishful nonthinking allows the mullahs of Tehran to get their hands on nuclear weapons. Because I am in no doubt that they would take full advantage of such a lethal lever. We would have acquiesced in the creation of an empire of extortion. War is an evil. But sometimes a preventive war can be a lesser evil than a policy of appeasement. The people who don’t yet know that are the ones still in denial about what a nuclear-armed Iran would end up costing us all.

Read more from the original source:
Israel’s Case for War With Iran

This isn’t surprising at all, or at least the actions of Russia and China. What’s surprising is how firm — even bellicose — Ambassador Susan Rice comes across in her statements. I’m long past the point of regime change in Syria, and we don’t need the U.N to do it. At the New York Times , ” Russia and China Block U.N. Action on Syrian Crisis .”

Excerpt from:
Russia and China Veto United Nations Resolution on Syria

Scores Killed in Riots After Egypt Soccer Match

On February 2, 2012, in Uncategorized, by Richard Riker

At CNN, ” Egyptian health ministry: 74 dead, hundreds injured in soccer riots ,” and Los Angeles Times, ” Egypt soccer match brawl leaves at least 73 dead .”

See the article here:
Scores Killed in Riots After Egypt Soccer Match

Great, just as the Obama administration confirmed that the U.S. will end its combat role at the end of 2013. The news is at London’s Daily Mail , ” So is it all worth it? Secret files reveal Taliban will retake control of Afghanistan when NATO troops withdraw “: The Taliban is set to return to power in Afghanistan when British and Coalition forces end their combat role in 2014, a damning leaked confidential report reveals. Despite 10 years of fighting by NATO forces and their huge sacrifices – 397 members of the British military alone have been killed and thousands wounded – the report says that in the past year there has been unprecedented interest, even from within the Afghan government, in joining the Taliban. And it points accusingly at Afghanistan’s neighbour Pakistan, a key ally of NATO, where powerful elements in the security and intelligence services support the Taliban and describes how insurgent leaders maintain homes within the heart of the capital Islamabad. Based on 27,000 interviews with over 4,000 Taliban and Al Qaeda prisoners, the detailed report effectively questions the Coalition’s own assessment that it is winning the war in Afghanistan. The report – The State of the Taliban – was described as ‘devastating’ yesterday (W) by former soldier Ian Sadler, whose son Jack, a 21-year-old reservist serving with the Honourable Artillery Company, died in a roadside bomb blast in Helmand in December 2007. ‘It has been a waste of time operating in the way that the British have,’ he said, ‘Hearing details of the report makes me wonder why our soldiers were sent there in the way they were and the cost that has been paid.’ The report compiled by US forces describes how weapons and vehicles given to Afghan forces have in turn been passed on to the Taliban and says that Pakistan’s feared Inter-Services Intelligence Agency (ISI) is actively colluding with the insurgents by actually directing attacks. Continue reading . I can’t help but think that we’re screwed. Secretary of State Rice, upon leaving office, warned that if we wanted another 9/11, all we had to do was abandon Afghanistan. Let’s hope she was wrong. I’ll have more later.

Visit link:
Taliban Ready to Seize Power in Afghanistan After NATO Pulls Out

Well, you gotta give it to the Obama administration. They got Bin Laden so now it’s time to go easy on the Taliban, the medieval Islamist terror-sponsor who executes teenage girls for escaping arranged marriages and who is now looking to build deeper alliances with Pakistani militants to fight U.S. forces. But hey, it’s a new day. Barack Obama’s on the way! At Wall Street Journal , ” Emboldened Taliban Try to Sell Softer Image “: KABUL — When the Taliban ruled Afghanistan in the 1990s, Maulvi Qalamuddin headed the Committee to Protect Virtue and Prevent Vice, the religious police that shut down girls’ schools, beat up men with insufficiently long beards and arrested those in possession of music or video tapes. Nowadays, the 60-year-old Taliban cleric is on a different mission: He is overseeing a network of schools that teach reading, writing and math to thousands of girls in his home province of Logar, an insurgent hotbed just south of Kabul. “Education for women is just as necessary as education for men,” Mr. Qalamuddin thunders. “In Islam, men and women have the same duty to pray, to fast—and to seek learning.” The Taliban’s restrictions on women and schooling, combined with support for al Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden, turned the group into an international pariah even before the September 2001 attacks on America. Now, as the U.S. pulls out its troops and tries to negotiate a peace settlement with the insurgents, the international community grapples with a crucial question: If returned to power, will the Taliban behave any more responsibly this time around? In recent public statements, the Taliban have made an effort to appear a more moderate force, promising peaceful relations with neighboring countries and respect for human rights. The big unknown is whether this new rhetoric represents a meaningful transformation—or is merely designed to sugarcoat the Taliban’s real aims. “One might believe that they would change over time,” says U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Curtis Scaparrotti, the day-to-day commander of the U.S.-led coalition forces in Afghanistan. “You see some messages that they might open their thinking a bit about women, a woman’s place in society. But I don’t know that I would bet on it.” U.S. and Taliban representatives have met over the past several months, trying to establish a dialogue that could end America’s longest foreign war. In a tangible sign of progress in early January, the Taliban dropped their insistence that all foreign troops must leave Afghanistan before any peace talks begin and agreed to set up a representative office in Qatar to facilitate future negotiations. To create trust in these talks, the U.S. is considering transferring to Qatari custody five senior Taliban officials incarcerated at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Despite a new willingness to negotiate with the U.S., however, the Taliban’s leadership still believes it can reach its war aim of seizing Kabul and the rest of Afghanistan after most foreign forces withdraw in 2014, American military commanders agree. Continue reading . For some reason optimism eludes me here. But the drumbeat for precipitous withdrawal continues on the left, and even some on the mainstream right think we should pull out — because the Obama administration’s prosecution of the war has endangered American lives. Another reason to vote Republican in the fall, no matter who wins the nomination. We need to repair American foreign policy and commit to completing the gains in international security that the Bush administration had secured before the Corrupt-o-crats took office. Sheesh.

The rest is here:
The Taliban Go Mainstream: Afghanistan Terror-Sponsors Seek ‘Softer Side’ to Medieval Political Regime

IDF Weapons Instructors

On January 26, 2012, in Uncategorized, by petreewild969

Via Theo Spark :

View post:
IDF Weapons Instructors

Tagged with: