Via Weasel Zippers, ” Paint by Numbers: Andrew C. McCarthy — The Grand Jihad “:

See original here:
Global Islamist Jihad and the Threat to America

Imaginary Mammograms

On February 4, 2012, in Uncategorized, by prsnlinjurys

From last year, via Live Action : And here’s this from Live Action just today, ” The Numbers Don’t Lie: Planned Parenthood, Komen, & Breast Exams .”

See the article here:
Imaginary Mammograms

Henninger: Obama’s Maddening, Winning Speech

On February 2, 2012, in Uncategorized, by AlexisChristensen28

He will marginalize his opponents as the bloodless Numbers People.

Read the original post:
Henninger: Obama’s Maddening, Winning Speech

It’s been a positive week for Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, as he appears to have turned the tides since his crushing South Carolina primary loss to Newt Gingrich, now surging to the top of polls in Florida before the state’s Republican primary today. While Florida polls show Romney defeating the visibly furious Gingrich and the other remaining Republican candidates, several other polls show that the bruising last few weeks may have hurt the former Massachusetts governor on a broader scale of the electorate. A Washington Post-ABC News poll released Tuesday shows that 40 percent of those surveyed find Romney’s work in the private sector unfavorable, 35 percent favorable, 25 percent had no opinion. Greg Sargent of the Post notes that the polling team also says “that among non-college whites — a key swing consistency that is one of the  main targets  of the battle over Romney’s corporate past and taxes — 35 percent view his Bain work favorably, versus 38 percent who view it unfavorably. Among moderates, the numbers are 32-39.” A  separate WashingtonPost-Pew Research Center poll released Monday shows that 39 percent of registered voters see Romney connecting at least “fairly well” with the problems of average Americans, as oppose to 55 percent for President Obama. In yet another poll, this time conducted by NBC/WSJ last week , Romney’s negatives appeared to be spiking 20 points among independent voters over the last two months. While the former Massachusetts governor may be happy with a recent USA/Today Gallup poll having Romney neck and neck with Obama in swing states , and a key win in Florida tonight is likely to put him back in the drivers seat for the Republican nomination, the Romney campaign should be less celebratory than they were following the New Hampshire primary victory. If he were to become the nominee, Romney’s campaign has their work ahead of them to repair their candidate’s public image following what has been an extremely arduous primary race.

See the rest here:
While Romney looks to win the bloody battle of FL, polls say he may be losing a broader war

Tagged with:
 

The scimitar horned oryx is extinct in the wild.

According to a recent 60 Minutes report, Texas has more exotic wildlife than any place on Earth. More than 125 exotic species can be found, many of which are endangered in their native habitats. But on these animal resorts, populations seem to be thriving. Why? They’re being hunted. While this may seem counter intuitive, hunting these animals costs a pretty penny, and much of the proceeds go to ensuring a strong population of these endangered animals for the future. Lara Logan with “60 Minutes” reports that it would cost $4,500 to kill a scimitar horned oryx — an animal considered extinct in its native habitat — $10,000 for a dama gazelle and $50,000 for a cape buffalo. In addition to bringing in revenue, Logan reports that the business employs about 14,000 people in Texas. But, as you might expect, animal rights activists aren’t happy about this method of maintaining the population. In fact, Priscilla Feral, president of Friends of Animals, implies on the show that she would rather see the animals go extinct than live on such resorts. Watch the clip: It appears as if Feral will get her way to an extent. 60 Minutes reports that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will soon begin enforcing a rule that requires a strict federal permit to hunt some of these animals on ranches, which was not required before. For Charlie Seale, who represents 5,000 exotic animal ranches as the executive director of the Exotic Wildlife Association, this means less business, less money and therefore less to contribute to maintaining a strong population of the scimitar horned oryx and two other endangered antelope to which the rule applies: “I will say that in five years you’ll see half the numbers that you see today. And I would venture to guess in 10 years they’ll be virtually none of ‘em left,” [Seale said.] Here is a clip sharing the pro-hunting perspective: Seale and the hunters consider themselves conservationists. Seale says that without the money, they would not be able to support the growth of the herd population:  you sacrifice one so that many more are born and raised from calves all the way up to the big trophy male or the big trophy females that we have. On the flip side, animal activists don’t see this as an acceptable form of animal conservation. They believe that the hunts are made too easy and that the animals belong in preserves in their natural habitat. Feral said: I don’t want to see them on hunting ranches. I don’t want to see them dismembered. I don’t want to see their value in body parts. I think it’s obscene. I don’t think you create a life to shoot it. Here’s more from Feral’s perspective: When asked if she would rather the animals “not exist at all”, Feral said “not in Texas, no.”

Link:
Could TX Hunting Actually Help Save These Endangered Species?

Tagged with:
 

Why? Because “There’s no compelling scientific argument for drastic action to ‘decarbonize’ the world’s economy.” After a few paragraphs describing how not every scientist is a Warmist, and the numbers who are opting out of previous held beliefs that Mankind is mostly or solely at fault, we get to (h/t Climate Depot) (Wall Street Journal) In

Visit link:
16 Concerned Scientists: Chill Out, No Need To Freak Over Anthropogenic Global Warming

Here’s what’s important in the financial world this morning: This week, markets will look to extend their gains to date. On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve will release policy news and throughout the week look for a barrage of corporate earnings reports. News from Europe could affect this week’s market on news from Greece’s debt-swap talks and Monday’s European Union finance ministers meeting. They will talk about the recent fiscal-pact draft, according to MarketWatch. Over in the Asian markets, many markets will be closed for holidays but there will be news from Japan and Thailand’s central banks. Markets in Hong Kong, Shanghai and Shenzhen will be closed from Monday through Wednesday; the Taipei market will be closed on Thursday. South Korea’s market will be shut down on Monday and Tuesday. Australian markets are closed on Thursday. On Tuesday, the Reserve Bank of India will make its policy announcement. In December, it did not have any interest rate hikes and suggested it was done with doing so and was ready to focus on growth. The Bank of Japan will also announce its policy news on Tuesday. On the following day, look for news nuggets of the bank’s moves in its policy statement. The Bank of Thailand will report its policy move on Wednesday. Back in the U.S. get ready for earnings. Lots of earnings. Chevy Volt is “safe”:  U.S. regulators ended an investigation into why Chevrolet Volt electric cars caught fire, and said electric  vehicles  do not pose a greater risk of fire, according to Bloomberg. The conclusion by the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration came two weeks after General Motors Co. told owners to bring the vehicles to dealerships for repair. “Based on the available  data , NHTSA does not believe that Chevy Volts or other electric vehicles pose a greater risk of fire than gasoline-powered vehicles,” the agency said in an e- mailed statement today. EU vs Iran:  The European Union formally adopted an oil embargo against Iran on Monday and froze the assets of Iran’s central bank, part of sanctions to pressure Tehran into resuming talks on its controversial nuclear program. Two Iranian lawmakers, stepped up threats that their country would shutter the strategic Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of the world’s crude flows, in retaliation for the EU oil sanctions on Tehran. Lawmaker Mohammad Ismail Kowsari, deputy head of Iran’s influential committee on national security, said Monday the strait “would definitely be closed if the sale of Iranian oil is violated in any way.” Tensions over the strait and the potential impact its closure would have on global oil supplies and the price of crude have weighed heavily on consumers and traders. Both the U.S. and Britain have warned Iran not to disrupt the world’s oil supply. Many analysts doubt that Iran could set up a blockade for long, but any supply shortages would cause world oil supplies to tighten temporarily. For its part, the United States has enacted, but not yet put into force, sanctions targeting Iran’s central bank and, by extension, the country’s ability to be paid for its oil. Economic Numbers and Fed Speak Monday:  Eurogroup meeting of eurozone finance ministers. Tuesday:  Ecofin meeting of EU finance ministers, Day One of FOMC meeting, and President Obama’s State of the Union address. Wednesday:  Pending Home Sales index for December,FOMC policy announcement and Ben Bernanke Press Conference. Thursday:  Durable Goods orders for December, Weekly jobless claims, December new home sales and leading indicators. Friday:  Fourth-quarter GDP report and University of Michigan consumer sentiment for January. [ Editor’s note: the above is a cross post that originally appeared on Wall St. Cheat Sheet. ] The Associated Press contributed to this story.

Read the original post:
Morning Market Roundup: EU Adopts Iran Embargo, Volt Investigation Closed

Tagged with:
 

You may not think of a credit card — a piece of plastic with a magnetic strip — as the most technologically advanced device but a company is taking credit cards beyond this level to improve fraud prevention and even allow for multiple accounts on one card.

(Photo: Dynamic Inc.)

Ars Technica reports that Dynamic Inc., showed off some of its Credit Card 2.0 technology at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas, including a card with a special magnetic strip programmed in real time and cleared of data after use (the Dynamic Credit Card). Other cards produced by the company include: a card that requires the users to type in a code on the card itself before use; a card that lets the users chose to use a credit card’s points program for a purchase; and a card that brings multiple credit accounts onto one piece of plastic. Here’s how Ars Technica describes the device: The technology is impressive. The cards look and feel much like existing credit cards, and can be kept in your wallet and bent without harming the internal electronics. The difference is that an empty screen replaces a section of the numbers on the card’s face, and you have to tap in a key using five built-in buttons before making a purchase. The LCD screen is then filled with a unique credit card number, and the magnetic strip on the back is coded with that number for use in the transaction. Once the transaction is over, the numbers leave the face of the card, and the magnetic strip returns to its blank state.

This prototype of the Dynamic multiple accounts credit card lets the users flip between a personal and corporate credit account with the touch of a button. (Photo: Dynamic Inc.)

With this technology, a stolen card cannot be effectively used — unless the thief has your code — and credit card numbers are meaningless because they change with each use. Cards using this technology, you may have guessed, need to be powered in some way. Ars Technica reports that the cards are run on batteries with a three year lifespan. It also notes that some pilot programs using the cards are already underway. Watch this demo from CES a couple years ago displaying how the card works:

See the original post here:
Credit Card 2.0 Technology Aids in Fraud and Theft Prevention

Tagged with:
 

You know, that’s the thing about progressives: When they encounter some embarrassing, incriminating facts, they lash out in anger and denial, and try to twist reality to conform to their demented views — views marinated and metastasized under their sick revolutionary progressive ideology. Racist Repsac3 has a big butthurt post whining about how he’s not really a racist anti-Semitic Jew-basher, despite endorsing a movement that was founded on property expropriation, revolution, and anti-Jewish and anti-Israel eliminationism. In fact, racist Walter James Casper spouts lies to cover up for his endorsement of the hate: The movement is about income inequality, joblessness, and ways to make the system (financial, and electoral) more fair. Money is not speech. Corporations are not people. Equitable taxation, where everyone above poverty wages pays their fair share on all they earn. The people should have more political power and access than those who can pay for it. Politicians and their votes shouldn’t be for sale. God, that’s so bad I don’t even know where to start. But first, to reiterate, it’s a lie. Walter James Casper III is lying again, attempting to blow a smokescreen over his extreme radical agenda, his live and let live, if it feels good do it, anti-capitalist, anti-American, anti-Israel revolutionary program. I’ve documented the facts here many times, and racist anti-Semite Walter James Casper III deliberately avoids the truth because he cannot answer for the hate. Progressive hate. Walter James Casper III is the epitome of the exterminationist, big-lie neo-commie hate-filled progressive. But let’s review: Recall that the origins of Occupy predate the Zuccotti Park mobilization by at least a couple of years, and I’ve covered much of that here at the blog. See my report from last month, ” On the Origins of the Occupy Movement .” The initial Occupy mobilizations were explicitly revolutionary, advocating militant collective action. They were not about this stupid “money is not speech” bullshit. Occupy is working to destroy capital altogether. The militants were about occupying the capitalist occupiers and expropriating the capitalist expropriators. Idiot racist Repsac3 stupidly parrots the Rachel Maddow talking points. It’s f-king embarrassing. Sheesh. Now, setting aside the original occupations, let’s continue with New York’s Occupy Wall Street. Recall that the impetus for the New York action is found in the agitation of

Tagged with:
 

You know, that’s the thing about progressives: When they encounter some embarrassing, incriminating facts, they lash out in anger and denial, and try to twist reality to conform to their demented views — views marinated and metastasized under their sick revolutionary progressive ideology. Racist Repsac3 has a big butthurt post whining about how he’s not really a racist anti-Semitic Jew-basher, despite endorsing a movement that was founded on property expropriation, revolution, and anti-Jewish and anti-Israel eliminationism. In fact, racist Walter James Casper spouts lies to cover up for his endorsement of the hate: The movement is about income inequality, joblessness, and ways to make the system (financial, and electoral) more fair. Money is not speech. Corporations are not people. Equitable taxation, where everyone above poverty wages pays their fair share on all they earn. The people should have more political power and access than those who can pay for it. Politicians and their votes shouldn’t be for sale. God, that’s so bad I don’t even know where to start. But first, to reiterate, it’s a lie. Walter James Casper III is lying again, attempting to blow a smokescreen over his extreme radical agenda, his live and let live, if it feels good do it, anti-capitalist, anti-American, anti-Israel revolutionary program. I’ve documented the facts here many times, and racist anti-Semite Walter James Casper III deliberately avoids the truth because he cannot answer for the hate. Progressive hate. Walter James Casper III is the epitome of the exterminationist, big-lie neo-commie hate-filled progressive. But let’s review: Recall that the origins of Occupy predate the Zuccotti Park mobilization by at least a couple of years, and I’ve covered much of that here at the blog. See my report from last month, ” On the Origins of the Occupy Movement .” The initial Occupy mobilizations were explicitly revolutionary, advocating militant collective action. They were not about this stupid “money is not speech” bullshit. Occupy is working to destroy capital altogether. The militants were about occupying the capitalist occupiers and expropriating the capitalist expropriators. Idiot racist Repsac3 stupidly parrots the Rachel Maddow talking points. It’s f-king embarrassing. Sheesh. Now, setting aside the original occupations, let’s continue with New York’s Occupy Wall Street. Recall that the impetus for the New York action is found in the agitation of

Tagged with: