‘Wingnut Hunting Season’

On February 9, 2012, in Uncategorized, by arlenschumer

The radical left, emboldened by the trashing of Komen, is expanding its assault to other charitable organizations as well. And across the leftosphere, it’s been way more than victorious football-spiking. Progressives are out for blood. I’m only half joking when I say I expect to see conservative piked heads in no time. John Cole’s fanning the agitation, that’s for sure, ” They Fucking Hate You .” And from the comments , just a sample of the bloodthirsty mob: We have them outnumbered, and they have already been doing their worst, all this time. They are already literally murdering people as best they can, calling for it as openly as they can, and doing everything short of that as well. It is ON. If it comes to eye-for-an-eye ‘wingnut hunting season’, I swear I will not shed tears for these people. They’ve challenged my liberal instincts enough. I don’t owe their point of view a goddamn thing. They’ve been lying and/or wrong all this time and I’m fed up with it. I’m supposed to be alarmed if I say, ‘hi, I’m a socia1ist’ for fear they will claim my ideas are bad for everybody? Reality says THEIR ideas are bad for everybody. Very beat down and frustrated by this point. Don’t want to go full reactionary, but I’m wondering why the hell not. Just keep reading those comments for a taste of how desperate these f-kers are. Man, this is going to be one hella election year.

Read the rest here:
‘Wingnut Hunting Season’

Well, actually, Kennedy’s not all the conservative these days, so it won’t be a surprise. He’s into the “evolving standards of decency” doctrine that’s been used is left-wing decisions on the death penalty; and more importantly, Kennedy wrote the majority opinion in Lawrence v. Texas , which struck down sodomy laws in 2003. I’d have to research it, but the Court often hesitates to overturn state-level initiatives, arguing that the judgment of the Court can’t be assumed superior to the voters in those states where a case originates. That said, here’s David Savage, at Los Angeles Times , ” Gay marriage fight may hinge on Supreme Court’s Anthony Kennedy “: The Supreme Court has nine justices, but if the constitutional fight over same-sex marriage reaches them this year, the decision will probably come down to just one: a California Republican and Reagan-era conservative who has nonetheless written the court’s two leading gay rights opinions. JusticeAnthony M. Kennedy, 75, often holds the court’s deciding vote on the major issues that divide its liberals and conservatives. More often than not, that vote has swung the court to the right. But on gay rights, Kennedy has been anything but a “culture wars” conservative. One of his opinions lauded the intimacy between same-sex couples and demanded “respect for their private lives,” provoking Justice Antonin Scalia to accuse him of having “signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda.” “He is a California establishment Republican with moderately libertarian instincts,” Stanford University law professor Pamela Karlan said of Kennedy. “He travels in circles where he has met and likes lots of gay people.” Based on Kennedy’s past opinions, Karlan is confident that if the Supreme Court takes up the issue of California’s same-sex marriage ban, “it meansProp. 8is going down to defeat,” she said. “There is no way he will take it to reinstate” the ban. Not all court observers share her prediction, but the uncertainty about how Kennedy might vote may, by itself, be enough to deter the high court from hearing an appeal of the decision by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Four justices must vote for the court to consider a case, but a majority is needed to issue a ruling. When an appeal reaches the high court, the four most conservative justices will face a tough choice: Vote to have the court hear the case and run the risk that Kennedy would side with the more liberal justices to go beyond the 9th Circuit decision and establish a nationwide right to same-sex marriage. Or turn the case aside, leaving same-sex marriage intact in California but setting no national precedent. More at the link .

Continued here:
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy Might Cast Deciding Vote Striking Down Proposition 8

At Los Angeles Times , ” Mitt Romney trips up as GOP race moves westward “: The Republican presidential contest shifted to the West and Midwest on Wednesday as an exultant Mitt Romney dueled with the man he hopes to meet in November, President Obama, but found himself sidetracked when an infelicitous remark was seized upon by his opponents. Romney’s comment came as he sought, following his landslide win Tuesday in Florida, to cast himself as the inevitable nominee, a posture that had eluded him since his Jan. 21 collapse in South Carolina. “I’m in this race because I care about Americans. I’m not concerned about the very poor. We have a safety net there. If it needs repair, I’ll fix it,” he told CNN. His characterization about the poor immediately metastasized online. Asked about it later, Romney explained, “Of course I’m concerned about all Americans — poor, wealthy, middle class — but the focus of my effort will be on middle-income families who I think have been most hurt by the Obama economy.” Newt Gingrich, a distant second in Florida, sought to take advantage of Romney’s wording as he spoke to hundreds of supporters packed into Great Basin Brewing Co. in Reno. “I am fed up with politicians in either party dividing Americans against each other,” said Gingrich, at his first Nevada event before Saturday’s caucuses. Drawing a sharp distinction between himself and Romney, he added, “I am running to be the president of all of the American people, and I am concerned about all of the American people.” Romney’s comment also drew condemnation from Obama partisans who have repeatedly exploited the candidate’s quotes to argue that Romney is out of touch. And Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.), who endorsed Romney four years ago, encouraged him to “backtrack,” saying the very poor needed jobs, not welfare programs. I’m with DeMint on this. While Romney’s comments aren’t really that controversial — at least not when placed in context — this is hardly the message you want to send. The problem isn’t that we don’t have enough public assistance, but that we have too much of it . We’ve got soul-crushing dependence on government and destruction of personal responsibility.

The Mechanics of the Vote Pump

On January 29, 2012, in Uncategorized, by HansonLorna33

It’s Bill Whittle’s Firewall:

Go here to see the original:
The Mechanics of the Vote Pump

Tagged with:
 

Mark Levin Slams Newt Gingrich Attackers!

On January 27, 2012, in Uncategorized, by RomieObriant368

My goodness. This is a vociferous rant, via Legal Insurrection, ” “If this is what the conservative movement has become, then count me out” “:

Read more here:
Mark Levin Slams Newt Gingrich Attackers!

Obama’s Making the Economy Worse

On January 26, 2012, in barack obama, Uncategorized, by moshesharon

Via Conservative Manifesto : RELATED : From James Pethokoukis, ” Obama suppresses his inner Elizabeth Warren during SOTU speech .”

Originally posted here:
Obama’s Making the Economy Worse

Well, so much for all the optimism on the economy. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke’s not too bullish. At New York Times , ” Fed Signals That a Full Recovery Is Years Away “: WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve said on Wednesday that it was likely to raise interest rates at the end of 2014, but not until then, adding another 18 months to the expected duration of its most basic and longest-running response to the financial crisis. The announcement means that the Fed does not expect the economy to complete its recovery from the 2008 crisis over the next three years. By holding short-term rates near zero beyond mid-2013, its previous estimate, the Fed hopes to hasten that process somewhat by reducing the cost of borrowing. The Fed said in a statement that the economy had expanded “moderately” in recent weeks, but that unemployment remained at a high level, the housing sector remained in a deep depression, and the possibility of a new financial crisis in Europe continued to threaten the domestic economy. The statement, released after a two-day meeting of the Fed’s policy-making committee, said that the Fed intended to keep rates near zero until late 2014. Continue reading . The economy is expected to grow at a rate of 2.2 to 2.7 percent for this year, and unemployment is expected to remain at 8.2 percent, down from the current 8.5 percent but not at a level that would indicate robust job growth. Maybe Republicans can make some political hay out of this. Seriously, the GOP will be snatching defeat from the jaws of victory if they lose.

Read this article:
Federal Reserve Won’t Raise Interest Rates Until 2014: Signals That Full Economic Recovery Still Years Away

Well, so much for all the optimism on the economy. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke’s not too bullish. At New York Times , ” Fed Signals That a Full Recovery Is Years Away “: WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve said on Wednesday that it was likely to raise interest rates at the end of 2014, but not until then, adding another 18 months to the expected duration of its most basic and longest-running response to the financial crisis. The announcement means that the Fed does not expect the economy to complete its recovery from the 2008 crisis over the next three years. By holding short-term rates near zero beyond mid-2013, its previous estimate, the Fed hopes to hasten that process somewhat by reducing the cost of borrowing. The Fed said in a statement that the economy had expanded “moderately” in recent weeks, but that unemployment remained at a high level, the housing sector remained in a deep depression, and the possibility of a new financial crisis in Europe continued to threaten the domestic economy. The statement, released after a two-day meeting of the Fed’s policy-making committee, said that the Fed intended to keep rates near zero until late 2014. Continue reading . The economy is expected to grow at a rate of 2.2 to 2.7 percent for this year, and unemployment is expected to remain at 8.2 percent, down from the current 8.5 percent but not at a level that would indicate robust job growth. Maybe Republicans can make some political hay out of this. Seriously, the GOP will be snatching defeat from the jaws of victory if they lose.

Read more from the original source:
Federal Reserve Won’t Raise Interest Rates Until 2014: Signals That Full Economic Recovery Still Years Away

Karl at Hot Air has a fisking, ” When Andrew Sullivan is useful .” Image Credit : BuzzFeed . (Via Instapundit .) PREVIOUSLY : ” Andrew ‘Milky Loads’ Sullivan Smears Obama Critics as ‘Dumb’ in Newsweek Cover Story ,” and ” Here’s Andrew Sullivan’s ‘Why Are Obama’s Critics So Dumb?’ Piece at Newsweek .”

Read more:
Obama’s Conservative Critics Aren’t ‘Dumb’