**Written by Doug Powers Clearly this must be Bush’s fault: When a random sample of 1004 adults were asked to compare the 43rd and 44th presidents, 34 percent of respondents said Obama had been a worse president than Bush, while 22 percent said he was about the same. Forty-three percent, a plurality, said they preferred Obama’s handling of the presidency. Predictably, Democrats were most supportive of Obama, while Republicans favored Bush in the poll. The response from independent voters might be most telling for Obama: a troublesome 67 percent said they considered him about the same or worse than Bush. The latest Economist/YouGov poll pegs Obama’s overall approval at 36%, and Gallup puts Obama’s approval among men at the same number (but that’s nothing a few more photo ops riding the hog can’t bring back up). Today the president has convened an emergency meeting to figure out how to get those numbers back up. (Update: today’s golf partner is Bill Clinton ) Will Wolf Blitzer trumpet Obama’s new low like he did when Bush hit 36%? (h/t HAP ): **Written by Doug Powers Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

Read more from the original source:
Majority Rate Obama ‘Same or Worse’ Than Bush, New Poll Puts Approval at 36%

The latest national survey from Resurgent Republic is revealed. Ed Gillespie, a former RNC chairman, said the result that jumped out the most to him was that 60 percent of respondents said that Obama has been a weaker leader than they expected when his term began; 33 percent said he was “much weaker” than they expected. He says he thinks this helps explain what he calls “incendiary” language coming from President Obama and his allies. Keep reading this post . . .

Read the rest here:
Resurgent Republic Poll: 60% Say Obama Weaker Than Expected

If President Obama and his supporters thought today’s Washington Post poll

(Associated Press) — More than half of Muslim-Americans in a new poll say that government anti-terrorism policies single them out for increased surveillance and monitoring, and many report increased cases of name-calling, threats and harassment by airport security, law enforcement officers and others. Still, most Muslim-Americans say they are satisfied with the way things are going in the U.S. and rate their communities highly as places to live. The survey by the Pew Research Center, one of the most exhaustive ever of the country’s Muslims, finds no signs of rising alienation or anger among Muslim-Americans despite recent U.S. government concerns about homegrown Islamic terrorism and controversy over the building of mosques. “This confirms what we’ve said all along: American Muslims are well integrated and happy, but with a kind of lingering sense of being besieged by growing anti-Muslim sentiment in our society,” said Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Washington, D.C.-based Muslim civil rights group. “People contact us every day about concerns they’ve had, particularly with law enforcement authorities in this post 9/11 era,” he said. Muslim extremists hijacked the planes on Sept. 11, 2001, crashing them into the Twin Towers, the Pentagon and a field in Shanksville, Pa. In all, 52 percent of Muslim-Americans surveyed said their group is singled out by government for terrorist surveillance. Almost as many _ 43 percent _ reported they had personally experienced harassment in the past year, according to the poll released Tuesday. That 43 percent share of people reporting harassment is up from 40 percent in 2007, the first time Pew polled Muslim-Americans. Asked to identify in what ways they felt bias, about 28 percent said they had been treated or viewed with suspicion by people, while 22 percent said they were called offensive names. About 21 percent said they were singled out by airport security because they were Muslim, while another 13 percent said they were targeted by other law enforcement officials. Roughly 6 percent said they had been physically threatened or attacked.

Continue reading here:
Poll: Muslim-Americans Whine About U.S. Anti-Terror Policies…

I think what's most surprising about these numbers is that they're from a sample of “registered voters,” not “likely voters”: Fully half of registered voters say they would definitely or probably vote for a candidate other than President Obama if the presidential election were held today, according to a new Allstate/ National Journal Heartland Monitor poll. 50 percent of registered voters surveyed said they would definitely or probably vote for someone else, while just 40 percent said they would definitely or probably vote for the president. Just 22 percent of registered voters said they would definitely vote for Obama, while 18 percent said they would probably vote for him. 35 percent would definitely vote for someone else while another 16 percent would probably vote for someone else. Jim Geraghty

Read more:
National Journal: Only 40% Would Definitely/Probably Reelect Obama

Despite all the talk about Americans’ appreciation for limited government, a new CNN poll finds that they have little appetite for spending cuts to actual programs that would be necessary to reduce the deficit. The poll gave respondents a list of government programs and asked whether they would prefer to reduce the deficit, or prevent significant cuts to the programs. The response was discouraging: 79 percent said they’d prefer avoiding cuts to Medicare; 69 percent said the same about Medicaid; 78 percent on Social Security; 61 percent wanted to preserve aid to farmers; 65 percent said that about college loans; and 61 percent about unemployment assistance. The only programs in which a majority

See the rest here:
Poll Shows Americans Not too Keen on Actual Spending Cuts

Good News and Bad News for John Dingell’s Opponent

On September 20, 2010, in Uncategorized, by If Bush Did It

It's rather hard to argue that Rep. John Dingell is particularly vulnerable this year; he's represented his portion of Michigan since roughly the Paleozoic Era. But from time to time in recent weeks, there were murmurs that the congressman was a bit worried, and knew he couldn't take reelection for granted. Now we have some numbers : Forty-nine-point-three percent of registered voters in Michigan's 15th congressional district said they'd choose to send the 84-year-old Dingell back to Washington, while 30.3 percent said they'd vote for Republican candidate Rob Steele. Rob Steele has a tough climb, but like the numbers below for Maryland senator Barbara Mikulski, this is a useful indicator; in 2008, Dingell won 71 percent to 25 percent. He had no Republican opposition in 2006. He won 70.9 percent of the vote in 2004 and 72.2 percent of the vote in 2002.

The Barr Is Set in Kentucky

On July 29, 2010, in Uncategorized, by If Bush Did It

Finally, a poll showing a House Democrat incumbent ahead: Democratic U.S. Rep. Ben Chandler begins the general election season with a 14-point lead over Republican challenger Andy Barr, although 37 percent of those surveyed have yet to form an opinion of Barr, the latest cn|2 Poll shows.The cn|2 Poll of 503 likely voters in the 6th Congressional District showed Chandler receiving support from 46.1 percent, while 32.2 percent said they planned to vote for Barr. Another 20.9 percent were undecided. Barr has his work cut out for him, but he has an incumbent below 50 percent and Barr's favorable/unfavorable split is a healthy 41.7/19.2. Obama's job approval/disapproval in this district is 46.6/50.3. Jim Geraghty

Read this article:
The Barr Is Set in Kentucky

Tagged with:
 

If you check the new poll out from National Journal , Americans by a 46 percent plurality support the continuation of Barack Obama’s economic policies. Yet, despite the misinformation at Daily Kos , the public is deeply divided over the extension of the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003: Regarding the tax cuts, 30 percent of Americans believe all of Bush’s 2001 and 2003 cuts should stay in place. That compared to 31 percent who believed that all of them should be repealed. Twenty-seven percent take the route Obama campaigned on: Tax cuts for the wealthy should be repealed, while the others should stay in place. That sentiment was consistent across income lines. Among those making more than $75,000, 26 percent said only the tax cuts for the wealthy should be repealed. For those making $30,000 to $74,999, 31 percent concurred. And among those making less than $30,000, 28 percent said the tax cuts for the wealthy should be overturned. Independents hewed closest to the overall sample. Twenty-seven percent said all the tax cuts should be kept in place. Thirty-two percent said they all should be repealed. Twenty-seven percent said the tax cuts for the wealthy should be repealed, but the middle class cuts should be kept in place. This debate has intensified recently as the legislative calendar winds down and an agreement on how to proceed on the issue, particularly in the Senate, has remained elusive. Unfortunately for Joan McCarter , one can’t combine all the subgroupings into “large majorities” supposedly opposed to extending the cuts. This table might help her out: Democrats and independents remain wary of a return to more market-oriented approaches to economic recovery. But time is running out. The 46 percent plurality is not a huge bulwark against anti-incumbent sentiment on the economy this year (Congress is down to 11 percent approval rating, and the majority party always bears the brunt of such throw-the-bums-out sentiment). And the 2012 primaries will commence a little more than 15 months from now. Basically, it’s on.

See the article here:
Public Prefers Obama’s Policies, But Not by ‘Large Majorities’

Summer of Recovery! The U.S. remains in a recession, 79 percent of voters tell the independent Quinnipiac University poll, compared to 74 percent who felt that way in May and 71 percent who said so in May of 2008, when the economy began its slide. American voters say 52 – 44 percent the economy is not beginning to recover.