<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>If Bush Did It &#187; president-obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ifbushdidit.com/tag/president-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ifbushdidit.com</link>
	<description>We would still be hearing about it!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:12:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Palin Speech Rocks CPAC, Crowd Drowns Out Occupy Mic Check With ‘U-S-A, U-S-A’</title>
		<link>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/12/palin-speech-rocks-cpac-crowd-drowns-out-occupy-mic-check-with-u-s-a-u-s-a/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/12/palin-speech-rocks-cpac-crowd-drowns-out-occupy-mic-check-with-u-s-a-u-s-a/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jacuzzi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marriott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nominee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president-obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sarah palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/12/palin-speech-rocks-cpac-crowd-drowns-out-occupy-mic-check-with-u-s-a-u-s-a/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Sarah Palin was in the zone during her well-received remarks at the Conservative Political Action Conference Saturday. In front of an electric crowd of conservative activists, the 2008 Republican candidate for Vice President slammed President Obama's ideology and called for a united GOP front against the Democrat in the general election, argued that the drawn out primary is good for whoever becomes the nominee, and insisted on a return to traditional values. “The president says small Americans, small-town Americans — we bitterly cling to our religion and our guns,” Palin said. “You say, I say, we say — keep your change. We’ll keep our God. We’ll keep our guns.” Palin said that members of the Tea Party rose up over the last three years because "Americans woke up." CNN reports that Palin said after serving time in Washington, elected officials decide that the nation's capital is not a "cesspool," but rather say it is "like a hot tub and they're hoping in and join the jacuzzi." "It's time to drain the jacuzzi ... throw the bums out with the bath water," she said. During the event's keynote speech Palin took aim at one of her favorite targets; the Environmental Protection Agency, and called on conservatives to push whoever the GOP nominee is across the finish line in November: Palin predicted that in his reelection effort, Obama will try to "reinvent himself," like "carhartts and steel toed boots are us." Palin did not endorse a candidate Saturday to challenge Obama in the general election. The New York Times notes that the former Alaska governor has repeatedly praised the candidacy of Newt Gingrich, saying a month ago that she would vote for him if she lived in South Carolina. When asked if Gingrich should step aside to allow conservative to coalesce behind Rick Santorum, Palin told the Times, “Not yet.” She said that there was “room for more debate, for more discussion, adding: “I wouldn’t encourage anyone to drop out.” Protesters disrupted Palin's remarks, the first such disturbance during a speech at this year's conference. ABC News reports that the response from Palin’s loyal supporters was fierce: "As protesters chanted at her from the back of the room at the Marriott, a man in the back row leaped over his chair, ran toward them and screamed, 'Get the hell out of here, you asshole!' The protesters were kicked out as others in the room began chanting 'USA! USA!' followed quickly by 'Sarah! Sarah!' 'See, you just won,' Palin ad-libbed to more cheers." Chris Field posted video of the protest and subsequent chants as seen from the crowd on The Blaze Blog earlier in the day. Occupy CPAC protesters have been outside the Marriott where the conference is being held since Wednesday, and have been coordinated by Washington D.C.'s AFL-CIO. Video of CPAC attendees drowning out the mic check Saturday:]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/12/palin-speech-rocks-cpac-crowd-drowns-out-occupy-mic-check-with-u-s-a-u-s-a/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt Romney is &#8216;Wishy-Washy&#8217; in California&#8217;s Central Valley</title>
		<link>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/12/mitt-romney-is-wishy-washy-in-californias-central-valley/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/12/mitt-romney-is-wishy-washy-in-californias-central-valley/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>prsnlinjurys</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[california]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crawford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james-crawford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president-obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radical left]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whirlwind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/12/mitt-romney-is-wishy-washy-in-californias-central-valley/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Steve Lopez, at Los Angeles Times , " In Central Valley, conservative flight to the right ": The way things are going in the GOP presidential primary, there's now an outside chance that California's 169 delegate votes — the most of any state in the nation — could come into play. Who knew? It seemed, way back when, that Mitt Romney was a safe bet to make it to the dance with President Obama in November. Then Newt Gingrich came on like the bull terrier he is, followed by a surprising surge from Rick Santorum. If the seesaw ride continues, it could even make California's June 5 primary relevant for once. So whom do California conservatives like? My poll may have a wide margin of error, scientifically speaking, but I did zigzag my way through the heavily Republican Central Valley one day last week, asking that very question. "Gingrich," said Joe Rebella, owner of Fresno's Whirlwind Car Wash, where the sign says "you'll see a whirl of difference." Romney comes off as "wishy-washy," said the carwash man, who isn't exactly "conservative" with a capital C. He said he's voted for Democrats and Republicans, but business at the Whirlwind has been worse than ever since Obama took office. About a year ago, Rebella lost a big prize when Fresno City Hall stopped having him wash its fleet of cars because of budget troubles. OK, but given the GOP gospel of ever-smaller government, does Rebella really think he'd get the city fleet back under a President Gingrich? In the tiny farm town of Pixley, south of Tulare, I strolled into the True Romance Tattoo parlor, because how could I not? "I'm a convicted felon," said the owner, Josh Richardson, explaining why he won't be voting in June or November. But if he could, he'd definitely vote Republican, on gun-rights issues alone. OK, swell. His grandpa, James Crawford, said he had switched party affiliation from D to R that very morning because Obama is nothing but "promises, promises, promises." Crawford plans to vote for Romney in the primary because Gingrich is nothing but a politician and lobbyist. OK, but with so many people suffering through a rough economy, does it bother Crawford that the fabulously rich Romney said he didn't care about poor people, or that he paid 13.9% in taxes on dividends while lots of working folks paid twice as much? "No," said Crawford. "That's the way it's set up." More at that top link. That's interesting that folks are switching to Democrat affiliation at this late date. It's not your mother's party, as Andrew Breitbart remarked at CPAC, not by a long shot. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/12/mitt-romney-is-wishy-washy-in-californias-central-valley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Act of Supremacy</title>
		<link>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/12/obamas-act-of-supremacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/12/obamas-act-of-supremacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MarkBeestler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[british]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catholic-church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[english]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[head-on-earth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark steyn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president-obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/12/obamas-act-of-supremacy/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mark Steyn does it again with a fantastic essay, at National Review , " The Church of Obama ": Announcing his support for Commissar Sebelius’s edicts on contraception, sterilization, and pharmacological abortion, that noted theologian the Most Reverend Al Sharpton explained: “If we are going to have a separation of church and state, we’re going to have a separation of church and state.” Thanks for clarifying that. The church model the young American state wished to separate from was that of the British monarch, who remains to this day supreme governor of the Church of England. This convenient arrangement dates from the 1534 Act of Supremacy. The title of the law gives you the general upshot, but, just in case you’re a bit slow on the uptake, the text proclaims “the King’s Majesty justly and rightfully is and ought to be the supreme head of the Church of England.” That’s to say, the sovereign is “the only supreme head on earth of the Church” and he shall enjoy “all honors, dignities, pre-eminences, jurisdictions, privileges, authorities, immunities, profits, and commodities to the said dignity,” not to mention His Majesty “shall have full power and authority from time to time to visit, repress, redress, record, order, correct, restrain, and amend all such errors, heresies, abuses, offenses, contempts, and enormities, whatsoever they be.” Welcome to Obamacare. The president of the United States has decided to go Henry VIII on the Church’s medieval ass. Whatever religious institutions might profess to believe in the matter of “women’s health,” their pre-eminences, jurisdictions, privileges, authorities, and immunities are now subordinate to a one-and-only supreme head on earth determined to repress, redress, restrain, and amend their heresies. One wouldn’t wish to overextend the analogy: For one thing, the Catholic Church in America has been pathetically accommodating of Beltway bigwigs’ ravenous appetite for marital annulments in a way that Pope Clement VII was disinclined to be vis-à-vis the English king and Catherine of Aragon. But where’d all the pandering get them? In essence President Obama has embarked on the same usurpation of church authority as Henry VIII: As his Friday morning faux-compromise confirms, the continued existence of a “faith-based institution” depends on submission to the doctrinal supremacy of the state. Continue reading . And at Blazing Cat Fur, " Mark Steyn on The New Yorker's Hatred of Catholics, and Barack Obama Becoming Henry VIII ." ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/12/obamas-act-of-supremacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Budget Seeks Tax Increase on Wealthy — Again!</title>
		<link>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/11/obama-budget-seeks-tax-increase-on-wealthy-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/11/obama-budget-seeks-tax-increase-on-wealthy-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>HansonLorna33</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[angeles-times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president-obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reelection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[said-the-budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warren-buffett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/11/obama-budget-seeks-tax-increase-on-wealthy-again/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's like a broken record, and the political battles will be like Groundhog Day. At Los Angeles Times , " Obama's budget plan draws upon his previous proposals ": President Obama will call for new spending on infrastructure, education and manufacturing research, as well as higher taxes on top earners, in a budget proposal aimed at underlining his top economic priorities as he gears up his reelection campaign. Senior administration officials Friday offered a preview of the president's 2013 budget proposal, which is due to be formally unveiled Monday. The blueprint outlined pulls heavily from proposals previously put forward by the president — including his jobs bill, most of which is stalled in Congress, and his deficit reduction plan, which fizzled in the failed congressional "super committee" charged with reducing the deficit. Officials said the budget would abide by spending caps set by Congress in the August budget deal, keeping discretionary spending levels essentially flat in fiscal 2013. Over the decade, discretionary spending would drop from 8.7% of gross domestic product to 5%, officials said. To achieve that, the August agreement mandates steep and unpopular cuts in defense and domestic spending, a result of the super committee's failure to forge a broader deficit reduction plan. The president's budget seeks to head off those cuts by offering up a new version of the deficit reduction package he introduced in September. The plan claims more than $4 trillion in deficit reduction. It would accomplish this through the expiration of President George W. Bush-era tax cuts on upper-income Americans, closing tax loopholes, winding down the military spending in Iraq and Afghanistan and cutting costs in Medicare and Medicaid. The plan will reiterate a call for tax reform to be guided by the so-called Buffett rule, the principle advocated by billionaire Warren Buffett that no household making more than $1 million a year should pay less than a 30% tax rate. But officials said the budget would not estimate how much revenue such a rule would generate. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/11/obama-budget-seeks-tax-increase-on-wealthy-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama’s fraudulent abortion mandate “accommodation” Updated: Prez condemns “cynical” opposition</title>
		<link>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/10/obamas-fraudulent-abortion-mandate-accommodation-updated-prez-condemns-cynical-opposition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/10/obamas-fraudulent-abortion-mandate-accommodation-updated-prez-condemns-cynical-opposition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bt5iek</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hawaii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president-obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[press-release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weekly-standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/10/obamas-fraudulent-abortion-mandate-accommodation-updated-prez-condemns-cynical-opposition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ File under: &#8220;How to fake a walkback.&#8221; With its unconstitutional, coercive, discriminatory Obamacare abortion mandate under fire, the White House announced&#8230;nothing today. A supposed &#8220;accommodation&#8221; to the policy will result in no compromise in the impact of the HHS edict forcing religiously affiliated health care providers and employers to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives, abortifacients, and related services that violate the religious principles and freedom of the mandate&#8217;s targets. In fact, close observers say today&#8217;s announcement will make things worse. The deets : With the White House under fire for its new rule requiring employers including religious organizations to offer health insurance that fully covers birth control coverage, ABC News has learned that later today the White House — possibly President Obama himself — will likely announce an attempt to accommodate these religious groups. The move, based on state models, will almost certainly not satisfy bishops and other religious leaders since it will preserve the goal of women employees having their birth control fully covered by health insurance. Sources say it will be respectful of religious beliefs but will not back off from that goal, which many religious leaders oppose since birth control is in violation of their religious beliefs. White House officials are likening it to the so-called Hawaii compromise. Phony baloney, say Catholic bishops: It&#8217;s difficult to know what people may mean by the &#8220;Hawaii compromise.&#8221; But a central feature of the Hawaii law is that every religious organization that is eligible for the exemption has to instruct all employees in how they can access all methods of contraception and sterilization locally &#8220;in an expeditious manner.&#8221; Just a few days ago the White House was saying that this is just about coverage, that no one has to be involved in getting people to the actual services they object to. It would be no improvement to say: &#8220;Sure, you don&#8217;t have to include the coverage, you just have to send all your lay employees and women religious to the local Planned Parenthood clinic.&#8221; The Administration&#8217;s press release of January 20 hinted at such a requirement. That would not be a compromise. In some ways it would be worse. As usual, this defiant administration keeps digging itself deeper. *** The Hill calls Obama&#8217;s announcement a &#8220;retreat.&#8221; The White House will announce a retreat from its controversial rule requiring religious organizations like charities and hospitals to include contraception in their healthcare plans. President Obama has come under heavy criticism from the Catholic Church and other religious organizations, Republicans and even some Democrats over the issue, and Vice President Biden has suggested a compromise could be worked out. A White House official on Friday confirmed an announcement on changing the rule would be made Friday. The White House is referring to the change as an accommodation. It&#8217;s not a retreat. It&#8217;s a re-trick. It&#8217;s not an accommodation. It&#8217;s an abomination. *** Update 11am Weekly Standard reporter John McCormak is on a conference call with White House officials providing background on the policy head fake. He tweets &#8230; Sr. admin off.: &#8220;the insurance company, not the hospital, not the charity will be required to reach out&#8221; to women to provide contraception So religious groups will still be mandated to offer plans that cover contraception, and the abortion drug ella. Reporter asks if WH even consulted bishops before announcing &#8216;accommodation.&#8217; Sr admin official won&#8217;t say. To clarify, religious groups have to contract with INSURERS who do offer the pills, then the insurers offers free pills to women. Update 12:26pm EST &#8211; From his brief press conference, Obama attacks &#8220;cynical&#8221; opponents of abortion mandate. He says &#8220;principle&#8221; of &#8220;access to free preventative care including contraceptive services&#8221; will stand. &#8220;Religious liberty will be protected.&#8221; Translation: You&#8217;re still screwed. *** Update: On Fox News, Kathleen The Shredder Sebelius attempts to defend the policy as a &#8220;no-cost strategy&#8221; by citing &#8220;actuaries&#8221; who claim that contraceptive coverage will actually &#8220;save money.&#8221; You know who she&#8217;s citing? The pro-abortion Guttmacher Institute. She repeatedly invokes &#8220;women&#8217;s health&#8221; to defend the edict. Sanger&#8217;s grim reapers have the rhetoric down pat. *** More from Steven Ertelt at Life News: Pro-Life Advocates Blast Revised Obama Pro-Abortion Mandate : Jonathan Imbody, Vice President for Government Relations for the Christian Medical Association, called the revisions “offering a distinction without a difference to mute opposition.” He said the revision fits a pattern of contempt for conscience that includes how Obama “has gutted the only federal regulation protecting the exercise of conscience in health care, denied of federal grant funds for aiding human trafficking victims because a faith-based organization refused to participate in abortion; lobbied the Supreme Court to restrict faith-based organizations’ hiring rights; and issued a coercive contraceptive mandate that imposes the government’s abortion ideology on every American.” ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/10/obamas-fraudulent-abortion-mandate-accommodation-updated-prez-condemns-cynical-opposition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nancy Pelosi Explains Why Obama Flip-Flopped on Super PACs</title>
		<link>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/10/nancy-pelosi-explains-why-obama-flip-flopped-on-super-pacs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/10/nancy-pelosi-explains-why-obama-flip-flopped-on-super-pacs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jessicamounst</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decision-which]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enemy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[help-explain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leave-the-field]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maybe-pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nancy-pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president-made]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president-obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-threats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/10/nancy-pelosi-explains-why-obama-flip-flopped-on-super-pacs/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ **Written by Doug Powers In the past few months and years, President Obama has castigated Super PACs. Obama has said &#8220;you can&#8217;t be against Super PACs one day and for them the next,&#8221; and he&#8217;s referred to 527s as a &#8220;threat to democracy.&#8221; Fortunately, Nancy Pelosi is here to help explain why these same threats to democracy, when reluctantly utilized by the pure of heart in emergency situations, can also be used to help preserve democracy. Here&#8217;s a brief transcript of Pelosi&#8217;s explanation by way of The Right Scoop : The president made a decision which I think was a wise one that he was not going to unilaterally disarm and leave the field to the Koch brothers to decide who would be POTUS and who would control the Congress. Maybe Pelosi&#8217;s right &#8212; it&#8217;s straight from Sun Tzu: &#8220;To know your enemy, you must become your enemy.&#8221; Of course, they didn&#8217;t have Super PACs in Sun Tzu&#8217;s day, which might explain why the book isn&#8217;t called &#8220;The Art of Hypocrisy&#8221;: **Written by Doug Powers Twitter @ThePowersThatBe ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/10/nancy-pelosi-explains-why-obama-flip-flopped-on-super-pacs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACLU:State Infringing on Catholic 1st Amendment Somehow Doesn’t Violate the Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/09/aclustate-infringing-on-catholic-1st-amendment-somehow-doesnt-violate-the-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/09/aclustate-infringing-on-catholic-1st-amendment-somehow-doesnt-violate-the-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ggallin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all-people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[announced-today]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[him-infringing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty-union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[not-violate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president-obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/09/aclustate-infringing-on-catholic-1st-amendment-somehow-doesnt-violate-the-constitution/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update from commenter: Here is a petition for all people that believe in the Constitution to sign to let Obama know how we feel about him infringing liberty. ACLU: The American Civil Liberty Union announced today that President Obama’s decision to mandate coverage for birth control does not violate religious liberty. The ACLU’s Alicia Gay warns that ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/09/aclustate-infringing-on-catholic-1st-amendment-somehow-doesnt-violate-the-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House to promote more positive jobs outlook 
    (AP)</title>
		<link>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/09/white-house-to-promote-more-positive-jobs-outlook-ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/09/white-house-to-promote-more-positive-jobs-outlook-ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sckarsz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[barack obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education-law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election-year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president-barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president-obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upbeat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white-house]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/09/white-house-to-promote-more-positive-jobs-outlook-ap/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ AP - The White House is lauding a rosier election-year economic forecast, predicting the economy could add two million jobs this year. But the upbeat projection is based partly on the shaky premise that Congress will sign off on President Barack Obama's jobs agenda. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/09/white-house-to-promote-more-positive-jobs-outlook-ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Issues Are Back in 2012 
    (ContributorNetwork)</title>
		<link>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/09/social-issues-are-back-in-2012-contributornetwork/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/09/social-issues-are-back-in-2012-contributornetwork/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matvej32MIRONOV</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[another-sphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-political]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perceived]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president-obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sociocultural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-perceived]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[these-social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touting-the-tea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/09/social-issues-are-back-in-2012-contributornetwork/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ContributorNetwork - COMMENTARY &#124; Just in time for the 2012 presidential election, America's tradition of cultural warfare appears to making an unwelcome resurgence. Uncertain, though, is whether this revert is just a brief departure from the economic debates that were so prominent in 2010, when fiscal conservatives touting the tea party brand were elected in spades to Congress. On the other hand, these social issues may be of high political significance. Certainly, with the economy in the process of improvement, critics of President Obama may be looking towards the perceived flaws of him and his party in another sphere altogether: the sociocultural realm of abortion, gay rights, and religious freedom.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/09/social-issues-are-back-in-2012-contributornetwork/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missing: A Surge in Voter Turnout the GOP Expected</title>
		<link>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/09/missing-a-surge-in-voter-turnout-the-gop-expected/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/09/missing-a-surge-in-voter-turnout-the-gop-expected/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TwilaManozca764</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaders-hoped]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over-the-slow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president-obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slow-economic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/09/missing-a-surge-in-voter-turnout-the-gop-expected/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican Party leaders hoped that antipathy toward President Obama and aggravation over the slow economic recovery would send a wave of Republican voters to the polls for presidential primaries. But turnout so far has been mixed.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ifbushdidit.com/2012/02/09/missing-a-surge-in-voter-turnout-the-gop-expected/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

