Labor Pains

On February 3, 2012, in barack obama, Uncategorized, by TiredOfIt

Not so long ago, the Great Satan to the labor movement was Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker — who faces a union-led recall election later this year. This week, if perhaps temporarily, that title is being claimed by Indiana Governor Mitch Daniels whose signature Wednesday made Indiana the only right-to-work state in the upper Midwest and one of only two such states in the entire northeast quarter of the nation. (See right-to-work state map here .) Labor unions would like you to think that right-to-work laws outlaw unions. But what they actually do is say that a person can’t be compelled to be a union member or pay union dues in order to hold a job. In other words, right-to-work laws increase the economic liberty of all Americans while threatening the funding sources for union bosses in states where workers are held captive to big labor. This of course threatens Democrats whose life blood is that same union money. Indiana is the 23rd right-to-work state and the first state to adopt a right-to-work law since Oklahoma, which took that step in September, 2001. The industrial, labor-dominated states of the Midwest’s “Rust Belt” such as Illinois, Michigan, and Ohio have for years been losing jobs (and population) to the South, where there are legal protections of workers’ and employers’ freedom. Indiana is aiming to become a Midwest alternative to those southern states. Republican Indiana Senate President Pro Tempore David Long, quoted in the Indianapolis Star , described an Indiana company which was going to move to Alabama but is now staying put, as well as saying that “a company from Michigan was planning to go to a ‘right to work’ state in the South. When they saw what was happening here, (they) invited the state to bid. . . . We are now in consideration for those jobs.” If Indiana can show that its new law is a magnet for jobs, it may turn out to be the first domino to fall across a part of the nation which has been rapidly losing manufacturing jobs while Democrats’ desire to protect union coffers has trumped their desire to promote their citizens’ prosperity. Although less discussed than Indiana’s move, Virginia also struck a blow for public finance rationality and to protect that state’s right-to-work law. With the state’s lieutenant governor casting a tie-breaking vote in the state senate, the legislature passed a bill that

Originally posted here:
Labor Pains

Tagged with:
 

Today’s Morning Jolt offers a look at a stirring defense of work and what we seem to be losing in America today, a question of whether it’s worse for Newt Gingrich to lie to the public or to himself in discussing why Freddie Mac hired him; and a wrap-up of a debate that makes one wonder if we really need any more debates this primary season. A Debate So Bad, We Missed Stephanopoulos’ Contraception Questions Keep reading this post . . .

Read more here:
Only a Few Letters Separate ‘Debate’ From ‘Debacle’

Tagged with:
 

(Image: Center for Science in the Public Interest/Jane Welna)

Health food vs. junk food in schools has been an ongoing battle for years, especially as the percentage of obese children has tripled since the 1970s. But is junk food sold in school really to blame? A new study, which the authors held back from publishing for two years due to its controversial findings, reveals that at least in middle school children, sugary drinks, fried food and other popular junk food purchased at school does not correlate to a rise in weight levels. Last year, The Blaze reported on stories ranging from schools eradicating junk food , schools banning home-packed lunches and the infamous debate over potatoes in school  meals, which resulted in Congress fighting for  potatoes to remain and stating that pizza was considered part vegetable. The new study published in journal Sociology of Education was produced from a review of data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study by Jennifer Van Hook, professor of sociology and demography at Pennsylvania State University, and her colleague Claire Altman. Van Hook and Altman found that in the subsample of 19,450 children grades fifth through eight, more than 59 percent of fifth graders and 86.3 percent of eighth graders attended schools where junk food was sold. According to the press release, while there was a significant percentage of students attending schools where junk food was sold, there was not a disproportionate number of students considered obese or overweight in these schools compared to institutions where junk food was absent. “There has been a great deal of focus in the media on how schools make a lot of money from the sale of junk food to students, and on how schools have the ability to help reduce childhood obesity,” Van Hook said in the release. “In that light, we expected to find a definitive connection between the sale of junk food in middle schools and weight gain among children between fifth and eighth grades. But, our study suggests that — when it comes to weight issues — we need to be looking far beyond schools and, more specifically, junk food sales in schools, to make a difference.” “Schools only represent a small portion of children’s food environment,” Van Hook said. “They can get food at home, they can get food in their neighborhoods, and they can go across the street from the school to buy food. Additionally, kids are actually very busy at school. When they’re not in class, they have to get from one class to another and they have certain fixed times when they can eat. So, there really isn’t a lot of opportunity for children to eat while they’re in school, or at least eat endlessly, compared to when they’re at home. As a result, whether or not junk food is available to them at school may not have much bearing on how much junk food they eat.” Van Hook said that the findings surprised the researchers so much that they held off publishing for nearly two years “because we kept looking for a connection that just wasn’t there.”

Read this article:
Study: Middle Schools Selling Junk Food Does Not Lead to Overweight Students

Given Beyonce and Jay-Z’s reported  $750 million  combined net worth—and their status as music’s  top-earning couple —you might say $1.3 million isn’t too extravagant an expense.

-By Warner Todd Huston On Wednesday morning the Washington Post’s Aaron Blake posted an infographic that was a perfect example of how one can use a graphic chart to influence the public in subtle ways, ways that we of the center right better start employing in our own efforts if we want to win over the

More:
Wash. Post Plays Hate-The-Rich-Republicans With Graphic Chart

Even Profitable Firms Fleeing California

On December 25, 2011, in Uncategorized, by Matvej32MIRONOV

Something I’ve written about on numerous occasions. At O.C. Register , ” California businesses can expect little sympathy from leadership in Sacramento “: Democratic reaction to the news that Waste Connections, a $3.6-billion company and major Sacramento-area employer, is headed to Houston to seek a friendlier business climate tells other businesses all they need to know about the attitudes of those who run California’s government. State Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, gave these clueless and snarky remarks in response to the news: “In this instance you have a company that is, in fact, profitable, making significant revenue gains in 2011 and 2010. That doesn’t speak to a bad business climate here in California when a good company is able to thrive in that way. So whatever Mr. Middelstaedt’s (company CEO) reasons are to leave the great state of California, I know I’m pushing back.” Steinberg claims to have worked on improving the state’s business climate, but from what we see in Sacramento, Steinberg and the party he helps lead have been pushing hard mainly for additional regulations and much higher taxes. The California Democratic Party’s attitude long has been that businesses are basically trying to rip off the public, and the source of all wealth and advancement can be found in the public sector, When businesses leave. Steinberg and Co. show little sympathy. That’s because Democrats suck. Continue reading at the link .

See original here:
Even Profitable Firms Fleeing California

We read: “Atheists and radical church-state separatists have taken particular offense to the continued uttering of the Pledge of Allegiance. To these individuals, the words “under God” have no place in the public square, even when utterances are voluntary in nature. Now, there’s a new epicenter in the debate over the Pledge. Following the 10th

See the original post:
‘It Is Inappropriate’: Anger After UConn Includes Pledge of Allegiance Before Sports Games

Donald Trump , America’s favorite game show host, talks a big talk about how much money he’s worth. In his new book “Time to get Tough,” he publishes the forms to prove it. Trump’s total net worth, according to the Public Financial Disclosure Report in his book, is over $7 billion ($7,004,900,000 to be exact). The bulk of it comes from his personal “brand” which is valued at $3 billion. THE BLAZE received an advance copy. It is officially released Monday.

Follow this link:
Trump hangs his assets out in new book

Tagged with:
 

Over at Human Events , John Hayward looks at Obama’s speech in Scanton to note the strange phenomenon of a man who has reached the heights of power and wealth through the public sector demonizing those who seek to reach those same heights through the private sector: There is no longer the slightest pretense of treating government as a dreadful expense to be shouldered by a consenting populace as evenly as possible, to perform a few carefully limited duties.

Over at Human Events , John Hayward looks at Obama’s speech in Scanton to note the strange phenomenon of a man who has reached the heights of power and wealth through the public sector demonizing those who seek to reach those same heights through the private sector: There is no longer the slightest pretense of treating government as a dreadful expense to be shouldered by a consenting populace as evenly as possible, to perform a few carefully limited duties.