Kristallnacht in New York?

On August 5, 2010, in Uncategorized, by If Bush Did It

On November 10, 1938, the Gestapo, the SS and various Nazi Youth and other brown-shirt militias launched a massive pogrom against Jews in Germany. The “Night of the Broken Glass,” the attacks resulted in nearly 100 Jews murdered and tens of thousands rounded up and shipped to concentration camps. Kristallnacht is widely considered the initial stage of the Nazi regime’s “final solution” to the Jewish problem. It would seem pretty evident to any reasonable person in America today that the country’s treatment of Muslim Americans doesn’t even remotely resemble the persecution of Jews during the interwar period of German history, and then into WWII and the Holocaust. But if we’ve learned anything about the political left in the last few years (if not sooner) it’s that the one political gambit that continues to pay off for Democrats and radicals is the claim of “discrimination.” We’re fortunately seeing some very successful pushback against the left’s incessant claims of racism, but it’s going to take continued efforts to beat back the lies and slanders that form the central discourses on the left-wing today. My latest case in point is Andrew Sprung’s entry,” Kristallnacht in New York? ” Sprung points to the New York Times ‘ coverage yesterday, highlighting the passage suggesting that opponents “aggressively scrutinize” donors to the Cordoba Project. The highlighted section also quotes Dan Senor, who said there’d be “a real stigma associated with this project.” Senor published one of the more thoughtful essays on the whole debate at yesterday’s Wall Street Journal , ” An Open Letter on the Ground Zero Mosque .” Your stated goal of interfaith and cross-cultural understanding is a good one-one that we all share and have devoted considerable energy to furthering. It may well be that this goal would be furthered still by the building and operation of Cordoba House. However, while we will continue to stand with you and your right to proceed with this project, we see no reason why it must necessarily be located so close to the site of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. I hardly see how such concerns warrant vicious comparison to Gestapo anti-Semitic pograms in the 1930s, but that’s where we are with today’s radical left. Everything’s about racism, discrimination, homophobia, hate speech, etc. Unreal. But one more example of a refusal of anti-conservatives to look at the issues dispassionately, and discuss things reasonably. RELATED : At National Review , ” Not at Ground Zero ,” via Memeorandum .

Follow this link:
Kristallnacht in New York?

Tagged with:
 

Some food for thought on this Monday morning from the Wall Street Journal There is a widespread perception of a strong link between immigrants and crime. It is common to hear those who oppose immigration argue that the first act illegal immigrants commit on U.S. soil is to break the law—that is, our

Visit link:
Are There Two Different Classes Of Illegal Immigrants?

**Written by Doug Powers President Obama and the Democrats have been calling out Republicans who opposed extending unemployment benefits without a way to account for the expenditure and piling on more debt. “May God have mercy on your souls,” said resident lunatic Rep. Alan Grayson in a fit of non-secularism to Republicans opposing the unfunded extension. But, in fact, Republicans are simply doing what Obama himself told everyone last year was “fiscally responsible.” This fact didn’t escape CBS News’ Mark Knoller : In signing the bill restoring unemployment benefits to 2 million Americans jobless for more than 26 weeks, President Obama is also adding $34 billion to the deficit and the National Debt. That’s the reason nearly all Republicans voted against the measure. They wanted the cost of the benefits paid for with unspent government funds or by other budget cuts. The White House dismissed GOP concerns as partisan game-playing. But Republicans were quick to remind Mr. Obama what he said after signing a previous extension of unemployment benefits on November 6th of last year. “Now, it’s important to note that the bill I signed will not add to our deficit. It is fully paid for, and so it is fiscally responsible,” he said. So eight months ago, he said paying for the benefits was the right thing to do, but now he sees no need to do so. Asked about the contradiction, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said he needed to examine what Mr. Obama said last November and would get back to this reporter. He didn’t. In November of 2009 when Obama signed that unemployment benefits extension, the Wall Street Journal quoted a couple of professors: The probability that a laid-off worker will find a job grows smaller the longer people have been out of work, according to studies in the 1980s by economists Lawrence Katz of Harvard University and Bruce Meyer of the University of Chicago. The above is often used as justification for extending unemployment benefits, but conversely, I don’t think the probability that a laid-off worker will find a job increases if he or she is mailed a check for years on end, either. Intentionally turning 15-20% of the would-be working population into permanent welfare cases is neither prudent on a national level nor dignified on a personal level, and it certainly shouldn’t be something promoted by people who claim to want everybody to be proud, self-respecting human beings. As Knoller reported, the latest benefits extension will need to be re-extended by around Thanksgiving. Rest assured Democrats are already preparing any number of “Grinch Who Stole Christmas” references for Republicans who oppose that new extension. **Written by Doug Powers Twitter @ThePowersThatBe

Read the rest here:
CBS Reports Obama’s Unemployment Benefits Flip-Flop

Reuters – Goldman Sachs Group Inc, JPMorgan Chase & Co and Citigroup Inc are among those Obama administration pay czar Kenneth Feinberg will cite for having made “ill-advised” payments, the Wall Street Journal reported on its web site on Thursday.

See the article here:
Pay czar to cite Goldman, JPMorgan, Citi: report
(Reuters)

In today's Jolt: The Obama Oil Spill Commission, Every Bit as Effective as Expected We might be at a turning point in the Gulf , but it feels like we’ve heard that before: “suddenly last Friday, [Thad] Allen announced that BP would install a tight-fitting containment cap that the administration thinks can stop within days all oil from leaking into the Gulf until the well is killed. Disaster response and environmental experts are divided over how harshly to critique the administration's initial response. More than 540 miles of coastline are oiled. About one-third of federal waters in the Gulf – 81,181 square miles – are closed to fishing. As much as 80 percent of the oil that has spilled might still be in the water or along the coast, if the government's high-range estimate of 60,000 barrels per day is accurate.” Well, how’s that… (groan) special commission working? Surely now that they’ve finally gotten around to their first meeting, they’re kicking you-know-what and taking names? The Wall Street Journal : “The presidential commission investigating the Gulf of Mexico oil spill spent the day hearing from representatives of the fishing and tourism industries, and generally steering away from questions about why the accident occurred. The seven-member panel, holding a hearing in New Orleans, also heard from BP North America senior vice president

Tagged with: