Have you heard about the latest overwrought tempest in a P.C. teapot on this post-Super Bowl Monday morning? It’s over Michigan Republican Pete Hoekstra’s “ insensitive ” Senate campaign ad using an Asian-American actress portraying a Chinese worker gloating over incumbent Dem. Sen. Debbie Stabenow’s big spending habits. Watch: Black ministers and Asian activists have decried the commercial. Both left and right are up in arms: The portrayal of a young Asian woman speaking broken English in a Super Bowl ad being run by U.S. Senate candidate Pete Hoekstra against Michigan incumbent Debbie Stabenow is bringing charges of racial insensitivity. GOP consultant Nick De Leeuw flat-out scolded the Holland Republican for the ad. “Stabenow has got to go. But shame on Pete Hoekstra for that appalling new advertisement,” De Leeuw wrote on his Facebook page Sunday morning. “Racism and xenophobia aren’t any way to get things done.” A media consultant who has advised Democrats also thought it could prove problematic. “Some Asian-Americans may be offended by the stereotype that is portrayed in the spot,” said Robert Kolt, who teaches advertising part-time at Michigan State University and had previewed a number of Sunday’s Super Bowl ads. “Pete seems like a nice guy in the ad, but I think he is wasting a lot of money now. … It’s just not Super Bowl-worthy. It’s not cute, it’s not funny and it’s not memorable.” Is the ad less than tasteful? Yes. Is it “xenophobic” to point out that China is benefiting ginormously from our fiscal recklessness, indebtedness, and outsourcing of jobs? Certainly not. Oddly enough (in other words: predictably enough), there was little uproar when Vice President Joe Biden — a serial P.C. offender — mocked an Indian accent in decrying outsourcing of call center jobs just last month: Back in 2006, Biden joked about Indian accents and Dunkin’ Donuts and gas stations — with a hardly a peep from the Sensitivity Police: Liberal Democrat Bob Beckel mocked GOP Gov. Bobby Jindal’s State of the Union response address and likened it to a “call center ad in Mumbai:” The P.C. police, as always, are P.C. only when it’s P.E. — politically expedient. As for all the lefties decrying the ugly nativism of the “Buy American” message that resonates with Rust Belt voters, I remind you that it’s not just Republicans who have channeled Pat Buchanan for electoral gain:

View post:
Accents, politics, and double standards
Check this out! An article written by yours truly was mentioned last week on CBS’ 60 Minutes . The CBS feature was about Groupon CEO Andrew Mason and posed the question: “Is Groupon’s swift success sustainable, especially given competition from the likes of Google and Amazon?” While addressing this question, 60 Minutes gave a little hat tip to a Blaze article titled “ GROUPON DEAL GOES HORRIBLY, HORRIBLY WRONG FOR CAKE MAKER .” You can check out the full 60 Minutes report here (The Blaze article is at the 8:03 mark). In the words of Bill Cosby: “That’s kinda’ cool.”

More here:
Did you see The Blaze on ‘60 Minutes’ last weekend?
Jeffrey Lord, former White House political director under Ronald Reagan, is slamming a piece in National Review Online that accuses Newt Gingrich of spewing “insulting rhetoric” about Reagan while he was president. The National Review piece, written by former Reagan Assistant Secretary of State Elliot Abrams, has gained significant traction as many conservatives have come forward to question Gingrich’s electability. The former House Speaker has repeatedly cast himself as a ” loyal lieutenant of Reagan’s bold conservatism ” against the more timid, “Massachusetts moderate” Mitt Romney. Writing in the American Spectator , Abrams, Lord says, has “been swept up in the GOP Establishment’s Romney frothings over the rise of Newt Gingrich in the Republican primaries.” But no more, he says, because Abrams has been “caught red-handed in lending himself to this attempted Romney hit job.” Some of the top examples Abrams cites come from a statement Gingrich made on the House floor in 1986. Lord obtained a copy of the speech, which he said Abrams is “grossly misrepresenting” as “some sort of anti-Reagan jihad:” Specifically, Abrams implies that Newt Gingrich was spewing mindless vitriol about Reagan on the House floor. Not only not so, it was quite to the contrary. Of President Reagan, Gingrich says: • “Let me be clear: I have the greatest respect for President Reagan. I think he personally understands the threat of communism.” Gingrich then goes on — at Newtonian length — praising Reagan for Reagan’s understanding of Lenin, Reagan’s understanding of the real “purposes of a Soviet dictatorship” and much more. He lists and applauds Reagan repeatedly for the President’s appreciation of “the threat in a more powerful Soviet empire” and the threats posed by Communist Cuba and Nicaragua. He ranks Reagan with the great cold war presidents in protecting freedom. In short, time after time after, Newt Gingrich — true to form — is there on the floor of the House relentlessly praising and crediting Ronald Reagan. Is it any wonder that years later Nancy Reagan would speak so publicly and warmly about “Ronnie” passing the conservative torch to Newt? Is there any wonder that Michael Reagan has stepped into the middle of this current brawl to endorse Newt? • Abrams quotes Newt for saying in this speech that Reagan’s policies towards the Soviets are “inadequate and will ultimately fail.” This is shameful. Why? Here’s what Newt said — in full and in context: “The fact is that George Will, Charles Krauthammer, Irving Kristol, and Jeane Kirkpatrick are right in pointing out the enormous gap between President Reagan’s strong rhetoric, which is adequate, and his administration’s weak policies, which are inadequate and will ultimately fail.” In other words, Newt was picking up on a concern, prominent in the day and voiced by no less than Reagan’s then ex-UN Ambassador Kirkpatrick, not to mention prominent Reagan supporters Will and Kristol and the late-Mondale aide turned conservative Krauthammer, that Reagan’s anti-Communist policies could be stronger if better institutionalized and not tied as much to the Reagan persona. The entire speech focused on suggestions of how to do just that — to effectively institutionalize Reagan’s conservative beliefs in the government. Is Abrams seriously accusing Jeane Kirkpatrick and George Will of being anti-Reagan? Of spewing “insulting rhetoric” at a president everyone in Washington knew they staunchly supported? Really? Of course not. But in apparent service to the Romney campaign, in order to make Newt Gingrich appear to be doing just that, Abrams apparently quite deliberately cut out the original Gingrich reference to Will, Kirkpatrick, Krauthammer, and Kristol. You can read Lord’s full analysis here .
Read the original post:
Former Reagan Adviser Questions NRO Piece About Gingrich’s Gipper Critiques
The New York Police Department is taking heat following revelations that a documentary about the threat of radical Islam was screened to nearly 1,500 officers during training.

Excerpt from:
‘A Slander Against the Film’: Narrator Says Documentary Shown to NYPD Officers Isn‘t ’Anti-Muslim’
Mitch Daniels and other GOP leaders criticize the president for not matching his actions to his words.
Mitch Daniels and other GOP leaders criticize the president for not matching his actions to his words.
So before the Patriots-Ravens AFC Championship game, some old lady in a sequined Patriots scarf – claiming to be Steven Tyler – screamed the national anthem. It was…not good. Check it out. But the worst national anthem peformance…and by worst, I mean best…belongs to Michael Bolton. Here is his at 2003 American League Championship Series. Sooooo many details to savor. a.) Bolton anticipated forgetting the words to the national anthem. b.) We know this because…he wrote the words on his palm. c.) And…he does…he forgets the words at the 0:46 mark. d.) Very nonchalantly Bolton brings his fingertips up to rest on the mike with his palm facing inward. Uh huh. Any delusions that I was smooth in ninth-grade Spanish class now destroyed. e.) Excruciating silence as he reads. f.) Immediately, Bolton closes his eyes to recapture the sincerity of his performance. g.) But, unfortunately, Bolton did not have Adam Sandler’s stupid remote control in Click. His song and the crowd were not put on pause. We all heard his pause. h.) A cascade of boos affirm, we were not on pause, we saw him read his palm. i.) The color guard behind him cracks and lets out a mocking smile. j.) Recognizing that he did not pull off his cheat, Bolton embarrassingly touches his temple and shakes his head. “My bad…” k.) In a desperate attempt to win back the crowd he gives a little extra on “rockets’ red GLARE!!!” l.) All of the above took place in 10 seconds time. Amazing. m.) At the end Bolton, dripping with false sincerity, points to the color guard that earlier laughed at him. k.) And finally… Bolton gives a clap to the color guard. But! But! But!…he leaves his left hand, the hand with the crib notes written on them closed… resulting in an awkward open hand to closed fist clap. It’s as though he doesn’t want us to see the notes that he just so obviously read. What is Bolton hiding? Does he have nudie pictures drawn next to “were so gallantly streaming.”
Continued here:
Worst National Anthem Performance: Tyler vs. Bolton
