Yemen’s leader allowed to come to US (AP)

On January 22, 2012, in Uncategorized, by joshuapousts

AP – The Obama administration will allow Yemen’s outgoing president to come to the U.S. temporarily for medical treatment, a move aimed at easing the political transition in Yemen, a key counterterrorism partner.

Originally posted here:
Yemen’s leader allowed to come to US
(AP)

AP – The Obama administration is engaged in an intensive effort with Yemen’s embattled strongman Ali Abdullah Saleh to find him a new home, preferably not in the United States, so that his violence-wracked Arabian homeland can proceed with a transition to democracy, U.S. officials say.

See the rest here:
AP sources: US seeks new home for Yemen strongman
(AP)

Yemen’s leader causes headaches in Washington (AP)

On December 28, 2011, in Uncategorized, by BojorquezLowry932

AP – The Obama administration is weighing an unprecedented diplomatic act — whether to bar a friendly president from U.S. soil.

Read more:
Yemen’s leader causes headaches in Washington
(AP)

Tagged with:
 

US weighing travel request for Yemen’s president (AP)

On December 26, 2011, in Uncategorized, by MalekAskew938

AP – The Obama administration is considering whether to allow Yemen’s outgoing president into the United States for medical treatment, as fresh violence and political tensions flare in the strategically important Middle Eastern nation.

Read the rest here:
US weighing travel request for Yemen’s president
(AP)

AP – The Obama administration is considering whether to allow Yemen’s outgoing president into the United States for medical treatment, as fresh violence and political tensions flare in the strategically important Middle Eastern nation.

See original here:
US weighing travel request for Yemen’s president
(AP)

SANAA, Yemen (TheBlaze/AP) — Yemen’s autocratic leader agreed Wednesday to step down after months of demonstrations against his 33-year rule, pleasing the U.S. and its Gulf allies who feared that collapsing security in the impoverished nation was allowing an active al-Qaida franchise to step up operations. President Ali Abdullah Saleh is the fourth leader to lose power in the wave of Arab Spring uprisings this year, following longtime dictators in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya. But the deal ushering Saleh from power grants him immunity from prosecution and doesn’t explicitly ban him from the country’s political life – raising doubts that it will address Yemen’s many problems. The deal opens the way to what will likely be a messy power struggle. Among those possibly vying for power are Saleh’s son and nephew, who command the country’s best-equipped military units; powerful tribal leaders; and the commander of a renegade battalion. Saleh had stubbornly clung to power despite nearly 10 months of huge street protests in which hundreds of people were killed by his security forces. At one point, Saleh’s palace mosque was bombed and he was treated in Saudi Arabia for severe burns. When he finally signed the agreement to step down, he did so in the Saudi capital of Riyadh after most of his allies had abandoned him and joined the opposition. Seated beside Saudi King Abdullah and dressed smartly in a dark business suit with a matching striped tie and handkerchief, Saleh smiled as he signed the U.S.-backed deal hammered out by his powerful Gulf Arab neighbors to transfer power within 30 days to his vice president, Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi. He then clapped his hands a few times. “The signature is not what is important,” Saleh said after signing the agreement. “What is important is good intentions and dedication to serious, loyal work at true participation to rebuild what has been destroyed by the crisis during the last 10 months.” Saleh had agreed to sign the deal three times before, only to back away at the last minute. The power transfer will be followed by presidential elections within 90 days. A national unity government will them oversee a two-year transitional period. The deal falls far short of the demands of the tens of thousands of protesters who have doggedly called for democratic reforms in public squares across Yemen since January, sometimes facing lethal crackdowns by Saleh’s forces. Protesters camped out in the capital of Sanaa immediately rejected the deal, chanting, “No immunity for the killer!” They vowed to continue their protests. President Barack Obama welcomed the decision, saying the U.S. would stand by the Yemeni people “as they embark on this historic transition.” King Abdullah also praised Saleh, telling Yemenis the plan would “open a new page in your history” and lead to greater freedom and prosperity. Saleh, believed to be in his late 60s, addressed members of the Saudi royal family and international diplomats at the signing ceremony, portraying himself as a victim who sought to preserve security and democracy but was forced out by power-hungry forces serving a “foreign agenda.” After the bombing in June, Saleh spent more than three months in Saudi Arabia for treatment, returning to Yemen unannounced and resuming his rule. As Saleh funneled more resources to cracking down on protesters, security collapsed across the country. Armed tribesmen regularly battle security forces in areas north and south of the capital, and al-Qaida-linked militants took over entire towns in southern Yemen. Saleh often used the fear of terrorism to shore up support for his rule, even striking deals with militants and using their fighters to suppress his enemies while raking in millions of dollars from the United States to combat the branch of al-Qaida that he let take root in his country. The U.S. saw little choice but to partner with him, and Washington stepped up aid to Saleh to fight Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula. That group, believed to be the terrorist group’s most active branch, has been linked to plots inside the U.S. The would-be bomber who tried to blow up a Detroit-bound plane on Christmas 2009 was in Yemen earlier that year. The Pakistani-American man who pleaded guilty to the May 2010 Times Square car bombing attempt was inspired by Internet postings by Anwar al-Awlaki, a Yemeni-American cleric who sought refuge in Yemen and was killed in a U.S. drone strike on Sept. 30. U.S. Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, charged with killing 13 people in the Nov. 5, 2009, rampage at Fort Hood, also exchanged e-mails with al-Awlaki. Even before the uprising began, Yemen was the poorest country in the Middle East, fractured and unstable with a government that had weak authority at best outside the capital. For months, the U.S. and other world powers pressured Saleh to agree to the power transfer proposal by the Gulf Cooperation Council. He agreed, but then backed down before signing the deal. The deal alone is unlikely to end the uprising or address Yemen’s deeply rooted problems. “He did sign, but I don’t think this is the end of the crisis in Yemen,” said Yemen expert Gregory Johnsen of Princeton University. The deal doesn’t address powerful members of Saleh’s immediate family, including his son who heads the elite Republican Guard. His relatives could continue to act as proxies for Saleh inside the government. Nor does the deal include Yemen’s most powerful opposition figures and their armed followers, including an army general who defected to the opposition and the country’s most powerful tribal leader. A real democratic transition could create a government to challenge al-Qaida in restive southern Yemen, Johnsen said, “but at this point we are still along ways from that.” It is unclear when Saleh will return to Yemen. U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said Saleh told him in a phone call that he would travel to New York for medical treatment after signing the agreement. He didn’t say when Saleh planned to arrive in New York, nor what treatment he would seek. Saleh signed the deal just over a month after videos showed a bloody Moammar Gadhafi being heckled by armed rebels in Libya shortly before his death. In some ways, the deal gave Saleh a way out. He can return to Yemen, so he won’t be exiled like ousted Tunisian strongman Zine El Abidine Ben Ali. And it protects him from prosecution, so he won’t be put on trial like Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak. Saleh implied he could play a role in Yemen’s future. “I’ll be among the most cooperative with the next coalition government,” he said. He said it would take decades to rebuild Yemen and struck out at those who strove to topple him, calling the protests a “coup” and the bombing of his palace mosque “a conspiracy” and “a scandal.” As he spoke, dark scars on his hands from his burns were visible. Protest leaders have rejected the Gulf proposal from the beginning, saying it ignores their principal demands of wide-ranging democratic reforms and putting Saleh on trial. They say the opposition political parties that signed the deal are compromised by their long association with Saleh’s government. Sanaa protest organizer Walid al-Ammari said the deal does not serve the interests of Yemen.” “We will continue to protest in the streets and public squares until we achieve all the goals that we set to achieve,” he said.

More:
Yemen President of 33 Years Quits Amid Uprising

Tagged with:
 

Springtime for Islamists in Tunisia?

On October 23, 2011, in Uncategorized, by Barry Munz

At LAT , ” Tunisia vote could shape religion in public life “: This nation that inspired revolution across the Arab world is facing another bellwether moment that may again foreshadow what happens throughout the Mideast in the intensifying battle between secularists and Islamists over the role of religion in shaping public life. Tunisians will vote Sunday for a constituent assembly that will set the course for a new government and write the nation’s laws. Islamists, suppressed for decades by autocratic rule, are poised to win big, a prospect that has liberals and secularists worried about the future of civil liberties. The outcome will be the latest evolution in a tumultuous year of Arab rebellion that last week saw Libyan leader Moammar Kadafi killed and his half-naked body laid out in a souk’s cold-storage locker, a gruesome show of contempt that would have been unthinkable just a few months ago. But it has been a year of the unfathomable: Here in Tunisia, the suicide late last year of a desperate fruit seller launched an uprising that in January brought down President Zine el Abidine Ben Ali. With quickening speed, revolt spread to Egypt, where President Hosni Mubarak was overthrown weeks later. Today, as the words “Arab Spring” have become the catchy lexicon of rebellion, the entrenched leaders of Yemen and Syria face gathering forces arrayed against them. The pressing concerns facing Tunisia mirror those of other countries trying to advance beyond the grip of tyrants. Voters here say they do not want the vital issues of joblessness, economic problems and widening youth disenchantment to be eclipsed by an Islamic agenda. But ambitions of Islamists have been simmering for years in a region where police states arrested their leaders and muffled the voices of fiery clerics. Freedoms brought by the Arab Spring are reigniting debates between Islamists and secularists, but also between ultraconservative and moderate Muslims over how deeply religion should permeate society . Also at WSJ , ” Large Numbers Turn Out for Tunisian Vote ” (via Google): Democracy activists across the region hope that a successful vote here could galvanize pro-democracy movements that have flagged amid violent regime crackdowns, as in Syria, Bahrain and Yemen, and by a pushback by old-guard counterrevolutionary forces, as in Egypt. Among the countries that have overthrown leaders, Tunisia presents the most fertile seedbed for democracy, say analysts: It has a relatively large and educated middle class. Women enjoy a measure of equality unmatched in the Arab world. The country has a tradition of civil rule both before and after January’s revolution. With a relatively homogenous population of 10 million, the country also suffers from few ethnic and sectarian rifts. The question is the degree to which Tunisia’s vote will apply to the likes of Egypt, Libya, Yemen or Syria, where uprisings have been bloodier and rife with internal tribal, sectarian or regional tensions. Tunisia may stand as an aspirational example, analysts say—or as a bar set too high.

Follow this link:
Springtime for Islamists in Tunisia?

Tagged with:
 

Using the upcoming trial of jihadist Terak Mehana — who was arrested on federal terrorism charges —  as a springboard, the “Occupy” movement has stretched beyond Wall Street and Washington to D.C. to the Rose Kennedy Greenway of Boston. To add fuel to the fire, The Boston Herald reports that the protesters played host to Mehanna’s supporters, who are using the demonstration to draw attention to the accused terrorist’s trial. Well, the group certainly seems to be accomplishing its mission. What the demonstration has also done, however, is draw correlation between the “Occupy” movements and those charged with conspiring to commit jihad — atrocious acts of murder — against fellow citizens on American soil and soldiers abroad. The Tarek Mehanna Support Committee reportedly came to Occupy Boston’s tent city to spread the word that, according to them, the Muslim American pharmacist is merely a victim of an anti-Muslim crusade. The U.S. government, however, says Mehanna provided “material support to a designated foreign terrorist organization,” and acted as a “media wing” for al-Qaeda. According to a bio in Time Federal authorities arrested then 27-year-old Mehanna in 2009 on charges that he conspired to provide material support to terrorists and planned to carry out a “violent jihad” by killing U.S. politicians, attacking American soldiers in Iraq and targeting customers at U.S. shopping malls. Time adds: U.S. attorneys claim that Mehanna worked with two other men on various plans designed to “kill, kidnap, maim or injure” U.S. citizens and soldiers from 2001 to 2008. He will be held in federal custody pending a detention hearing on Oct. 30. If he is found guilty, Mehanna faces up to 15 years in prison. Townhall provides even greater detail of Mehanna’s alleged activities: “ The conversations went so far as to discuss the logistics of a mall attack, including coordination, weapons needed and the possibility of attacking emergency responders ,” he said. But Mr. Loucks said the men could not obtain the automatic weapons they wanted for the plot, which he said was inspired by the 2002 sniper attacks in the Washington area.  The authorities did not name the two members of the executive branch whom they said Mr. Mehanna and his associates had chosen as targets. The two are not now in office, Mr. Loucks said, and they were not in danger from the plot. But it gets worse: At the time of his arrest on Wednesday, Mr. Mehanna was free on bail from an earlier arrest, in November 2008, at Logan International Airport in Boston, when he was charged with lying to federal investigators in a 2006 interview.  Mr. Mehanna, prosecutors said, had sought to obtain automatic weapons from a friend, Daniel Maldonado, who was at the time a terrorism suspect. Mr. Maldonado is serving a 10-year prison sentence for training with Al Qaeda in Somalia .  The complaint filed on Wednesday also states that  Mr. Mehanna and his associates traveled to Pakistan, Iraq, Syria and Yemen, seeking training from terrorist groups to fight against American soldiers . But the groups rejected them. Meanwhile, the Occupy Boston movement, whose members have been living on the Greenway for 10 days, claim not to have an official position on the Mehanna case despite hosting his support rally.

View original post here:
‘Occupy Boston’ Holds Rally for Accused Terrorist Charged with Planning ‘Violent Jihad’ Against U.S.

Tagged with:
 

ContributorNetwork – COMMENTARY | Dick Cheney just doesn’t get it. While he applauds the military mission in Yemen that resulted in taking out several pieces of a suspected al-Qaida terror cell, including fugitive from U.S. justice Anwar Al-Awlaki, Cheney is now also demanding an apology from President Barack Obama for remarks he made two years ago in Egypt, wherein he accused the Bush administration of over-reacting to 9/11.

The rest is here:
Cheney Says Obama Owes an Apology
(ContributorNetwork)

Tagged with:
 

I’m with David Harsanyi  and NRO’s  Kevin Williamson on assasinating al Awlaki.  We just set a precedent that the US president can murder his own citizens without due process based upon his judgement that someone is a bad guy…or a terrorist. Awlaki was undoubtedly a bad guy…but he was also an American citizen. Maybe he “joined the enemy”, maybe he was “on the battlefield”, maybe he was “fighting”. Does giving speeches in Yemen satisfy all those criteria? I don’t know. I just know that the bar should be VERY high in giving the POTUS permission to kill American citizens without due process. This is not a defense of al Awlaki. Rather this should just give us all pause.  I hope we ask these questions. I hope we define those criteria. Because, I don’t care how immature and hypothetical it may sound, the possibilities here do not play out pretty.

Read more:
RE: Chewing over al-Awlaki’s assasination